MOTIVATION: The somatic mutations in the pathways that drive cancer development tend to be mutually exclusive across tumors, providing a signal for distinguishing driver mutations from a larger number of random passenger mutations. This mutual exclusivity signal can be confounded by high and highly variable mutation rates across a cohort of samples. Current statistical tests for exclusivity that incorporate both per-gene and per-sample mutational frequencies are computationally expensive and have limited precision. RESULTS: We formulate a weighted exact test for assessing the significance of mutual exclusivity in an arbitrary number of mutational events. Our test conditions on the number of samples with a mutation as well as per-event, per-sample mutation probabilities. We provide a recursive formula to compute P-values for the weighted test exactly as well as a highly accurate and efficient saddlepoint approximation of the test. We use our test to approximate a commonly used permutation test for exclusivity that conditions on per-event, per-sample mutation frequencies. However, our test is more efficient and it recovers more significant results than the permutation test. We use our Weighted Exclusivity Test (WExT) software to analyze hundreds of colorectal and endometrial samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which are two cancer types that often have extremely high mutation rates. On both cancer types, the weighted test identifies sets of mutually exclusive mutations in cancer genes with fewer false positives than earlier approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: See http://compbio.cs.brown.edu/projects/wext for software. CONTACT: braphael@cs.brown.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: The somatic mutations in the pathways that drive cancer development tend to be mutually exclusive across tumors, providing a signal for distinguishing driver mutations from a larger number of random passenger mutations. This mutual exclusivity signal can be confounded by high and highly variable mutation rates across a cohort of samples. Current statistical tests for exclusivity that incorporate both per-gene and per-sample mutational frequencies are computationally expensive and have limited precision. RESULTS: We formulate a weighted exact test for assessing the significance of mutual exclusivity in an arbitrary number of mutational events. Our test conditions on the number of samples with a mutation as well as per-event, per-sample mutation probabilities. We provide a recursive formula to compute P-values for the weighted test exactly as well as a highly accurate and efficient saddlepoint approximation of the test. We use our test to approximate a commonly used permutation test for exclusivity that conditions on per-event, per-sample mutation frequencies. However, our test is more efficient and it recovers more significant results than the permutation test. We use our Weighted Exclusivity Test (WExT) software to analyze hundreds of colorectal and endometrial samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which are two cancer types that often have extremely high mutation rates. On both cancer types, the weighted test identifies sets of mutually exclusive mutations in cancer genes with fewer false positives than earlier approaches. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: See http://compbio.cs.brown.edu/projects/wext for software. CONTACT: braphael@cs.brown.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Annette Woiwode; Sandra A S Johnson; Shuping Zhong; Cheng Zhang; Robert G Roeder; Martin Teichmann; Deborah L Johnson Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Joris van de Haar; Sander Canisius; Michael K Yu; Emile E Voest; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Trey Ideker Journal: Cell Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Sisheng Liu; Jinpeng Liu; Yanqi Xie; Tingting Zhai; Eugene W Hinderer; Arnold J Stromberg; Nathan L Vanderford; Jill M Kolesar; Hunter N B Moseley; Li Chen; Chunming Liu; Chi Wang Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Claudia Calabrese; Natalie R Davidson; Deniz Demircioğlu; Nuno A Fonseca; Yao He; André Kahles; Kjong-Van Lehmann; Fenglin Liu; Yuichi Shiraishi; Cameron M Soulette; Lara Urban; Liliana Greger; Siliang Li; Dongbing Liu; Marc D Perry; Qian Xiang; Fan Zhang; Junjun Zhang; Peter Bailey; Serap Erkek; Katherine A Hoadley; Yong Hou; Matthew R Huska; Helena Kilpinen; Jan O Korbel; Maximillian G Marin; Julia Markowski; Tannistha Nandi; Qiang Pan-Hammarström; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Reiner Siebert; Stefan G Stark; Hong Su; Patrick Tan; Sebastian M Waszak; Christina Yung; Shida Zhu; Philip Awadalla; Chad J Creighton; Matthew Meyerson; B F Francis Ouellette; Kui Wu; Huanming Yang; Alvis Brazma; Angela N Brooks; Jonathan Göke; Gunnar Rätsch; Roland F Schwarz; Oliver Stegle; Zemin Zhang Journal: Nature Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Anupama Reddy; Jenny Zhang; Nicholas S Davis; Andrea B Moffitt; Cassandra L Love; Alexander Waldrop; Sirpa Leppa; Annika Pasanen; Leo Meriranta; Marja-Liisa Karjalainen-Lindsberg; Peter Nørgaard; Mette Pedersen; Anne O Gang; Estrid Høgdall; Tayla B Heavican; Waseem Lone; Javeed Iqbal; Qiu Qin; Guojie Li; So Young Kim; Jane Healy; Kristy L Richards; Yuri Fedoriw; Leon Bernal-Mizrachi; Jean L Koff; Ashley D Staton; Christopher R Flowers; Ora Paltiel; Neta Goldschmidt; Maria Calaminici; Andrew Clear; John Gribben; Evelyn Nguyen; Magdalena B Czader; Sarah L Ondrejka; Angela Collie; Eric D Hsi; Eric Tse; Rex K H Au-Yeung; Yok-Lam Kwong; Gopesh Srivastava; William W L Choi; Andrew M Evens; Monika Pilichowska; Manju Sengar; Nishitha Reddy; Shaoying Li; Amy Chadburn; Leo I Gordon; Elaine S Jaffe; Shawn Levy; Rachel Rempel; Tiffany Tzeng; Lanie E Happ; Tushar Dave; Deepthi Rajagopalan; Jyotishka Datta; David B Dunson; Sandeep S Dave Journal: Cell Date: 2017-10-05 Impact factor: 41.582