Imran Sulaiman1, Jansen Seheult2, Elaine MacHale3, Shona D'Arcy4, Fiona Boland5, Katrina McCrory6, John Casey7, Gerard Bury8, Mazen Al-Alawi2, Susan O'Dwyer9, Sheila A Ryder9, Richard B Reilly4, Richard W Costello10. 1. Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address: imransulaiman@rcsi.ie. 2. Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland. 3. Respiratory Department, Clinical Research Centre, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 5. RCSI Population Health Sciences, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland. 6. Primary Care Practice, Finglas Family Practice, Dublin, Ireland. 7. Primary Care Practice, Beaumont Park Clinic, Beaumont Woods, Dublin, Ireland. 8. Primary Care Practice, Coombe Medical Centre, Dublin, Ireland. 9. School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 10. Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland; Respiratory Department, Clinical Research Centre, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional observational studies suggest that between 50% and 60% of patients misuse a dry powder inhaler, whereas studies with electronic monitors indicate that patients sometimes overuse/underuse their inhalers. It is not known what impact errors and erratic use have on inhaler adherence. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to longitudinally quantify when and how patients adhered to a twice-daily preventer treatment by using a novel acoustic recording device attached to an inhaler (INhaler Compliance Assessment). METHODS: Patients with a history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 123) from primary care and community pharmacies were given an INhaler Compliance Assessment-adapted inhaler for 1 month. Analysis of the audio files provided quantitative information on time and technique of inhaler use. RESULTS: Data were available for 103 patients. Twenty-one patients (20%) used their inhaler in the correct manner at the correct interval. There were 5045 audio files with attempted inhalations, of which 1204 had technique errors (24%). Errors included inadequate flow (27%), drug priming without inhalation (19%), exhalation into the inhaler (18%), and multiple inhalations (25%). On average, participants made errors 20% of the time. Of 60 doses expected to be taken in a month per person, on average 49 doses (82%) were attempted and when errors were accounted for, the average number of actual doses taken was 34 doses (57%; P < .01) comparing attempted to actual doses. DISCUSSION: These data highlight that ineffective and irregular inhaler use is common and when combined in a single calculation indicate that only 20% of participants used their inhaler correctly and on time.
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional observational studies suggest that between 50% and 60% of patients misuse a dry powder inhaler, whereas studies with electronic monitors indicate that patients sometimes overuse/underuse their inhalers. It is not known what impact errors and erratic use have on inhaler adherence. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to longitudinally quantify when and how patients adhered to a twice-daily preventer treatment by using a novel acoustic recording device attached to an inhaler (INhaler Compliance Assessment). METHODS:Patients with a history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 123) from primary care and community pharmacies were given an INhaler Compliance Assessment-adapted inhaler for 1 month. Analysis of the audio files provided quantitative information on time and technique of inhaler use. RESULTS: Data were available for 103 patients. Twenty-one patients (20%) used their inhaler in the correct manner at the correct interval. There were 5045 audio files with attempted inhalations, of which 1204 had technique errors (24%). Errors included inadequate flow (27%), drug priming without inhalation (19%), exhalation into the inhaler (18%), and multiple inhalations (25%). On average, participants made errors 20% of the time. Of 60 doses expected to be taken in a month per person, on average 49 doses (82%) were attempted and when errors were accounted for, the average number of actual doses taken was 34 doses (57%; P < .01) comparing attempted to actual doses. DISCUSSION: These data highlight that ineffective and irregular inhaler use is common and when combined in a single calculation indicate that only 20% of participants used their inhaler correctly and on time.
Authors: Anne C Melzer; Bijan J Ghassemieh; Suzanne E Gillespie; Peter K Lindenauer; Mary Ann McBurnie; Richard A Mularski; Edward T Naureckas; William M Vollmer; David H Au Journal: Respir Med Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Amy Chan; Anna De Simoni; Vari Wileman; Lois Holliday; Chris J Newby; Claudia Chisari; Sana Ali; Natalee Zhu; Prathima Padakanti; Vasita Pinprachanan; Victoria Ting; Chris J Griffiths Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-06-13
Authors: Garrett Greene; Richard W Costello; Breda Cushen; Imran Sulaiman; Elaine Mac Hale; Ronan M Conroy; Frank Doyle Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John D Blakey; Bruce G Bender; Alexandra L Dima; John Weinman; Guilherme Safioti; Richard W Costello Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Alison Moore; Andrew Preece; Raj Sharma; Liam G Heaney; Richard W Costello; Robert A Wise; Andrea Ludwig-Sengpiel; Giselle Mosnaim; Jamie Rees; Ryan Tomlinson; Ruth Tal-Singer; David A Stempel; Neil Barnes Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 33.795
Authors: Terence E Taylor; Yaniv Zigel; Clarice Egan; Fintan Hughes; Richard W Costello; Richard B Reilly Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Matshediso C Mokoka; Lorna Lombard; Elaine M MacHale; Joanne Walsh; Breda Cushen; Imran Sulaiman; Damien Mc Carthy; Fiona Boland; Frank Doyle; Eoin Hunt; Desmond M Murphy; John Faul; Marcus Butler; Kathy Hetherington; J Mark FitzGerald; Job Fm van Boven; Liam G Heaney; Richard B Reilly; Richard W Costello Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 3.006