| Literature DB >> 27587298 |
Paula McCourt1, Hsing-Yin Liu1, Josie E Parker2, Christina Gallo-Ebert1, Melissa Donigan1, Adam Bata3, Caroline Giordano3, Steven L Kelly2, Joseph T Nickels4.
Abstract
Candida albicans is an opportunistic fungus responsible for the majority of systemic fungal infections. Multiple factors contribute to C. albicans pathogenicity. C. albicans strains lacking CaArv1 are avirulent. Arv1 has a conserved Arv1 homology domain (AHD) that has a zinc-binding domain containing two cysteine clusters. Here, we explored the role of the CaAHD and zinc-binding motif in CaArv1-dependent virulence. Overall, we found that the CaAHD was necessary but not sufficient for cells to be virulent, whereas the zinc-binding domain was essential, as Caarv1/Caarv1 cells expressing the full-length zinc-binding domain mutants, Caarv1C3S and Caarv1C28S, were avirulent. Phenotypically, we found a direct correlation between the avirulence of Caarv1/Caarv1, Caarrv1AHD , Caarv1C3S , and Caarv1C28S cells and defects in bud site selection, septa formation and localization, and hyphal formation and elongation. Importantly, all avirulent mutant strains lacked the ability to maintain proper sterol distribution. Overall, our results have established the importance of the AHD and zinc-binding domain in fungal invasion, and have correlated an avirulent phenotype with the inability to maintain proper sterol distribution.Entities:
Keywords: Candida; hyphae; lipid; sterol; virulence
Year: 2016 PMID: 27587298 PMCID: PMC5100844 DOI: 10.1534/g3.116.033969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Shown is a schematic representation of AHD motifs from several eukaryotes. The zinc-binding motif is underlined and conserved (+) or identical amino acids (bold) are indicated. Amino acids mutated are in red, and amino acid substitutions are in blue.
Strains and genotypes
| Strain | Text Designation | Genotype |
|---|---|---|
| BWP17 | ||
Primer sequences
| Primer Name | Sequence |
|---|---|
| CaARV1-5DR ( | 5′-CTGCTCTGATACTAGAGGCATTCAACGCCAGCATGTTTACATTGGGGAAGATACCGGATGTACCACCACTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTT-3′ |
| CaARV1-3DR ( | 5′-AATTGAACACTAAATACGAATACCCCAATCTAGTTAATGATTTAGACGGGCCAATGATTGCATTGGATGGTGTGGAATTGTGAGCGGATA-3′ |
| CaARV1-CON5F ( | 5′-GCGAACACCAATCAGAATTCG-3′ |
| CaARV1-CON3R ( | 5′-CCTTGAGAGCAATTGAAAGC-3′ |
| CgARV1-CONF2 ( | 5′-CAATATGGGCTCTTCTTCT-3′ |
| CgARV1-CONIR ( | 5′-GCCCATGGTAGGGTGAATACT-3′ |
| CgARV1-5 COMP ( | 5′-CAAGAATTGGACCATTCCAA-3′ |
| CgARV1-3 COMP ( | 5′-ACTTTACTTAATGTGATCATCC-3′ |
| CaARV1-5 COMP ( | 5′-ACACCAATCAGAATTCGTCA-3′ |
| CaARV1-3 COMP ( | 5′-TTACTGGATTATTGCCAACT-3′ |
| CaARV1-AHD- | 5′-GCGGATCCCAATCTGCATTTGGAA-3′ |
| CaARV1-AHD- | 5′-GCGTCGACTAATAGTCCCATTCTGAA-3′ |
| CaARV1-C3S-SDM5F (C3S allele generation) | 5′-TCCATTTTCAATGATCAGTATAGAATGTGGATATT-3′ |
| CaARV1-C3S-SDM3R (C3S allele generation) | 5′-TATCCACATTCTATACTGATCATTGAAAATGGATG-3′ |
| CaHIS-ARV1-DIAG5F ( | 5′-GTTGGTGTGGCCCAGAGAC-3′ |
| CaHIS-ARV1-DIAG3R ( | 5′-GTGACAACTCGTAGTGCCTCC-3′ |
| CaARV1-C28S-SDM5F (C28S allele generation) | 5′-TATATCAAACTAAGTGTAAGTCCCGAATGTAATAAAA-3′ |
| CaARV1-C28S-SDM3R (C28S allele generation) | 5′-TTTTATTACATTCGGGACTTACACTTAGTTTGATATA-3′ |
| CaHIS-ARV1 DIAG5F ( | 5′-GTTGGTGTGGCCCAGAGAC-3′ |
| CaHIS-ARV1 DIAG3R ( | 5′-GTGACAACTCGTAGTGCCTCC-3′ |
| CaHIS-PGEM-DIAG-3R ( | 5′-CTCCCGGCCGCCATGG-3′ |
| CaHIS-PDDB78-DIAG-3R ( | 5′-TCGAGGTCGACGGTATCGAT-3′ |
Figure 2Protein expression levels of various CaArv1 proteins. Cells were grown to exponential phase, then pelleted and cell extracts were obtained. (A) Proteins from cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Proteins levels were visualized using immunoblot blot analysis and anti-Ca/ScArv1 polyclonal antibodies. (B) Densitometry of the immunoblot was performed to determine the level of each protein compared to control CaArv1 protein. Densitometry values are the average of five independent experiments. *** P < 0.001.
Figure 3Caarv1/Caarv1 cells expressing Caarv1, Caarv1, or Caarv1 are avirulent. Mice were injected with the strains indicated, and the percentage survival was determined over 30 d. (A) Filled circles, CaARV1/CaARV1; open boxes, Caarv1/CaARV1; filled boxes, Caarv1/Caarv1; open triangles, Caarv1. (B) Open circles, Caarv1; open triangles, Caarv1; open pyramids, Caarv1.
Log rank P values
| Strain #1 | Strain #2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | ||
| <0.0001 | ||
| 0.0003 | ||
| <0.0001 | ||
| 0.0003 | ||
| 0.85 |
Log rank P values are compared between the ARV1/ARV1 strain, and the arv1/ARV1 and arv1/arv1 strains.
Log rank P values are compared between the arv1/ARV1 strain and the arv1AHD, arv1C3S, arv1C28S, and arv1CgARV1 strains.
Figure 4Organ fungal load analysis indicates differences between strains. Mice were injected with 105 cells/ml. Organs were harvested 2 d post injection. Each organ was homogenized and C. albicans CFUs were determined by plating homogenates onto YEPD plates containing chloramphenicol. Plates were incubated at 30° for 24 hr. Total CFUs were determined and counts were expressed as the log10 CFU/organ weight in grams. The values are the average values obtained from 8 to 10 combined organs from each strain. ** P < 0.001.
Sterol intermediate percentages
| Sterol | WT | Hetero | Null | AHD | C28S | C3S | CgARV1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown (Ergosta trienol) | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.01 |
| Ergosta-5,7,22,24(28)-tetraenol | 0.34 ± 0.06 | 0.65 ± 0.10 | 0.38 ± 0.12 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.34 ± 0.12 | 0.54 ± 0.22 | 0.60 ± 0.14 |
| Ergosta-5,8,22-trienol | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.60 ± 0.10 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.43 ± 0.13 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.53 ± 0.07 |
| Zymosterol | 6.0 ± 0.23 | 1.7 ± 0.06 | 1.6 ± 0.30 | 2.1 ± 0.05 | 2.1 ± 0.09 | 1.8 ± 0.11 | 1.7 ± 0.05 |
| Ergosterol (E5,7,22) | 73 ± 1.7 | 91 ± 0.45 | 78 ± 0.28 | 82 ± 0.08 | 80 ± 1.3 | 90 ± 0.79 | 90 ± 1.7 |
| Ergosta-8,22-dienol | 0.30 ± 0.08 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| Ergosta-5,8,22,24(28)-tetraenol | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.09 | 0.43 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 0.75 ± 0.12 | 0.70 ± 0.07 |
| Fecosterol (E8,24(28)-trienol) | 1.8 ± 0.11 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 1.1 ± 0.17 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 1.7 ± 0.17 | 3.1 ± 0.10 | 0.58 ± 0.21 |
| Ergosta-5,7,24(28)-trienol | 2.6 ± 0.35 | 0.58 ± 0.11 | 2.1 ± 0.20 | 3.8 ± 0.25 | 3.8 ± 0.13 | 2.2 ± 0.23 | 1.4 ± 0.25 |
| Ergosta 5,7 dienol | 2.4 ± 0.11 | 1.3 ± 0.09 | 7.1 ± 0.16 | 5.9 ± 0.16 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 6.0 ± 0.11 | 1.7 ± 0.29 |
| Episterol [E7,24(28)] | 4.0 ± 0.23 | 1.0 ± 0.23 | 2.2 ± 0.38 | 2.1 ± 0.23 | 2.1 ± 0.15 | 1.5 ± 0.47 | 1.7 ± 0.67 |
| Lanosterol/obtusifliol | 6.7 ± 1.4 | 0.71 ± 0.06 | 4.8 ± 0.09 | 1.7 ± 0.08 | 1.7 ± 0.09 | 2.1 ± 0.11 | 0.9 ± 0.21 |
| 4-Methyl fecosterol | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.87 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 4,4-Dimethylzymosterol | 1.6 ± 0.14 | 1.0 ± 0.17 | 1.0 ± 0.36 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.35 | 0.14 ± 0.26 | 0.35 ± 0.10 |
| Eburicol | 0.12 ± 0.07 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.23 ± 0.06 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
ARV1/ARV1.
arv1/ARV1.
arv1/arv1.
arv1AHD.
arv1C28S.
arv1C3S.
CgARV1.
The percentage differences between ARV1/ARV1 and arv1/ARV, and arv1/arv1.
The percentage differences between arv1/ARV1 and arv1AHD, arv1C3S, arv1C28S, and arv1CgARV1.
Figure 5Hyphal formation is delayed in strains carrying Caarv1AHD, Caarv1, and Caarv1 alleles. Various Caarv1 strains were grown to exponential phase in YEPD at 30°. Invasive growth was initiated by shifting cultures to 37° for 3 hr in 10% FBS. Hyphal formation was determined at 3 hr using light microscopy. (A) DAPI stained CaARV1/CaARV1 cells. (B) Percentage of cells forming hyphae. Percentages are the average of five independent experiments. ** P < 0.001; *** P < 0.0001.
Figure 6Bud site selection and septa formation are defective in strains carrying Caarv1, Caarv1, and Caarv1 alleles. Various Caarv1 strains were grown to exponential phase in YEPD at 30°. Invasive growth was initiated by shifting cultures to 37° for 3 hr in 10% FBS. (A, B), Bud site selection was determined at 3 hr by fixing cells in paraformaldehyde and staining with calcoflour white. (A) CaARV1/CaARV1 cells (arrows, septa; asterisk, chitin stained bud site). (B) Caarv1/Caarv1 cells (arrows, chitin stained bud site; hash signs, constrictions along the hyphae; asterisk, cells with two chitin stained bud sites). (C) White bars, number of cells with ≥2 chitin bud sites; black bars, number of cells with < 2 chitin bud sites.
Figure 7Sterol distribution during hyphal development is defective in strains carrying Caarv1AHD, Caarv1, and Caarv1 alleles. Various Caarv1 strains were grown to exponential phase in YEPD at 30°. Invasive growth was initiated by shifting cultures to 37° for 3 hr in 10% FBS. Sterol localization was determined at 3 hr by fixing cells in paraformaldehyde and staining with filipin. Sterol localization was visualized by fluorescence microscopy using a Leica DRME microscope. Arrows indicate sterol localization during hyphal growth; asterisks indicate defective sterol localization.
Figure 8Sterol localization to the hyphal tip is defective in Caarv1AHD, Caarv1, and Caarv1 allele expressing strains. Caarv1 strains were grown to exponential phase in YEPD at 30°. Invasive growth was initiated by shifting cultures to 37° for 3 hr in 10% FBS. Sterol localization was determined at 3 hr was determined by fixing cells in paraformaldehyde and using filipin staining and fluorescence microscopy. Sterol localization was visualized using a Leica DRME microscope. The data are the average of five independent experiments. ** P < 0.001; *** P < 0.0001.