Giulia Scioscia1,2, Isabel Blanco1,3,4,5, Ebymar Arismendi3,4, Felip Burgos1,3,4,5, Concepción Gistau1, Maria Pia Foschino Barbaro2, Bartolome Celli6, Denis E O'Donnell7, Alvar Agustí1,3,4,5. 1. Servei de Pneumologia, Institut Clínic Respiratori, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. 2. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Respiratory Disease, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy. 3. Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Spain. 5. Institut d'Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 6. Pulmonary Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Respiratory Investigation Unit and Laboratory of Clinical Exercise Physiology, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some patients with COPD report frequent acute exacerbations (AECOPD) of the disease (FE), whereas others suffer them infrequently (IE). Because the current diagnosis of exacerbation relies on patient's perception of increased symptoms (mostly dyspnoea), we hypothesised that dyspnoea perception might be different in COPD patients with FE (≥2 exacerbations or 1 hospitalisation due to AECOPD in the previous year) or IE (≤1 exacerbation in the previous year), AECOPD being defined by the institution antibiotics and/or steroids treatment, or hospital admission. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that dyspnoea perception is increased in FE and/or decreased in IE with COPD. METHODS: We compared the perception of dyspnoea (Borg scale), mouth occlusion pressure 0.1 s after the onset of inspiration (P0.1) and ventilatory response to hypercapnia (ΔVE/ΔPETCO2) in 34 clinically stable COPD patients with FE (n=14) or IE (n=20), with similar age, gender, body mass index and degree of airflow limitation. As a reference, we studied a group of age-matched healthy volunteers (n=10) with normal spirometry. RESULTS: At rest, P0.1 was higher in FE than IE and controls (p<0.01). Compared with controls, the ventilatory response to hypercapnia was equally blunted both in FE and IE (p<0.001). Despite similar spirometry, during rebreathing peak Borg score and ΔBorg were higher (p<0.01) in FE and lower (p<0.01) in IE, than in controls. CONCLUSIONS: Dyspnoea perception during CO2 rebreathing is enhanced in FE and blunted in IE. These differences may contribute to the differential rate of reported exacerbations in FE and IE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02113839. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
BACKGROUND: Some patients with COPD report frequent acute exacerbations (AECOPD) of the disease (FE), whereas others suffer them infrequently (IE). Because the current diagnosis of exacerbation relies on patient's perception of increased symptoms (mostly dyspnoea), we hypothesised that dyspnoea perception might be different in COPDpatients with FE (≥2 exacerbations or 1 hospitalisation due to AECOPD in the previous year) or IE (≤1 exacerbation in the previous year), AECOPD being defined by the institution antibiotics and/or steroids treatment, or hospital admission. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that dyspnoea perception is increased in FE and/or decreased in IE with COPD. METHODS: We compared the perception of dyspnoea (Borg scale), mouth occlusion pressure 0.1 s after the onset of inspiration (P0.1) and ventilatory response to hypercapnia (ΔVE/ΔPETCO2) in 34 clinically stable COPDpatients with FE (n=14) or IE (n=20), with similar age, gender, body mass index and degree of airflow limitation. As a reference, we studied a group of age-matched healthy volunteers (n=10) with normal spirometry. RESULTS: At rest, P0.1 was higher in FE than IE and controls (p<0.01). Compared with controls, the ventilatory response to hypercapnia was equally blunted both in FE and IE (p<0.001). Despite similar spirometry, during rebreathing peak Borg score and ΔBorg were higher (p<0.01) in FE and lower (p<0.01) in IE, than in controls. CONCLUSIONS:Dyspnoea perception during CO2 rebreathing is enhanced in FE and blunted in IE. These differences may contribute to the differential rate of reported exacerbations in FE and IE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02113839. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Fernando J Martinez; Alvar Agusti; Bartolome R Celli; MeiLan K Han; James P Allinson; Surya P Bhatt; Peter Calverley; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Badrul Chowdhury; Patrick Darken; Carla A Da Silva; Gavin Donaldson; Paul Dorinsky; Mark Dransfield; Rosa Faner; David M Halpin; Paul Jones; Jerry A Krishnan; Nicholas Locantore; Fernando D Martinez; Hana Mullerova; David Price; Klaus F Rabe; Colin Reisner; Dave Singh; Jørgen Vestbo; Claus F Vogelmeier; Robert A Wise; Ruth Tal-Singer; Jadwiga A Wedzicha Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Roland W Esser; Maria C Stoeckel; Anne Kirsten; Henrik Watz; Karin Taube; Kirsten Lehmann; Helgo Magnussen; Christian Büchel; Andreas von Leupoldt Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Maria Adelaide Calderazzo; Maria-Belen Trujillo-Torralbo; Lydia Joanne Finney; Aran Singanayagam; Eteri Bakhsoliani; Vijay Padmanaban; Tatiana Kebadze; Julia Aniscenko; Sarah L Elkin; Sebastian L Johnston; Patrick Mallia Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-04-10
Authors: Alexander J Mackay; Konstantinos Kostikas; Nicolas Roche; Stefan-Marian Frent; Petter Olsson; Pascal Pfister; Pritam Gupta; Francesco Patalano; Donald Banerji; Jadwiga A Wedzicha Journal: Respir Res Date: 2020-04-22
Authors: Sarah Bernard; Rui Vilarinho; Inês Pinto; Rosa Cantante; Ricardo Coxo; Rosa Fonseca; Sagrario Mayoralas-Alises; Salvador Diaz-Lobato; João Carvalho; Cátia Esteves; Cátia Caneiras Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Alvar Agustí; Albert Compte; Rosa Faner; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Guillaume Noell; Borja G Cosio; Robert Rodriguez-Roisin; Bartolomé Celli; Josep Maria Anto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240