Literature DB >> 27586830

Assessment of Psychosocial and Functional Impact of Chronic Pain.

Dennis C Turk1, Roger B Fillingim2, Richard Ohrbach3, Kushang V Patel4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The psychosocial and functional consequences of chronic pain disorders have been well documented as having significant effects on the experience of pain, presentation to health care providers, responsiveness to and participation in treatment, disability, and health-related quality of life. Thus, psychosocial and functional consequences have been incorporated as 1 of the 5 dimensions within the integrated Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION)-American Pain Society (APS) Pain Taxonomy (AAPT): 1) core diagnostic criteria; 2) common features; 3) common medical comorbidities; 4) neurobiological, psychosocial, and functional consequences; and 5) putative neurobiological and psychosocial mechanisms, risk factors, and protective factors. In this article we review the rationale for a biopsychosocial perspective, on the basis of current evidence, and describe a set of key psychosocial and behavioral factors (eg, mood/affect, coping resources, expectations, sleep quality, physical function, and pain-related interference with daily activities) that are important consequences of persistent pain and that should be considered when classifying patients within the comprehensive AAPT chronic pain structure. We include an overview of measures and procedures that have been developed to assess this set of factors and that can be used as part of the comprehensive assessment and classification of pain and to address specific research questions. PERSPECTIVE: Psychosocial and functional consequences are important considerations in the classification of individuals with chronic pain. A set of key psychosocial and behavioral factors (eg, mood/affect, coping resources, expectations, sleep quality, physical function, and pain-related interference with daily activities) that should be considered when classifying patients within the comprehensive classification of chronic pain disorders developed by the AAPT are outlined and examples of assessment methods for each are described.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsychosocial; beliefs; classification; fatigue; mood; physical function; sleep; social support; taxonomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586830     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  74 in total

1.  Persistent breast pain in post-surgery breast cancer survivors and women with no history of breast surgery or cancer: associations with pain catastrophizing, perceived breast cancer risk, breast cancer worry, and emotional distress.

Authors:  Dana H Bovbjerg; Francis J Keefe; Mary S Soo; Jessica Manculich; Alyssa Van Denburg; Margarita L Zuley; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Celette S Skinner; Sara N Edmond; Rebecca A Shelby
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  [The AMDS system for the documentation of symptoms and signs associated with pain].

Authors:  Teja W Grömer; Wolfgang Käfferlein; Björn Menger; Ralf Dohrenbusch; Bernd Kappis; Christian Maihöfner; Johannes Kornhuber; Alexandra Philipsen; Helge H O Müller
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 3.  Overlapping Chronic Pain Conditions: Implications for Diagnosis and Classification.

Authors:  William Maixner; Roger B Fillingim; David A Williams; Shad B Smith; Gary D Slade
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Sleep Quality, Affect, Pain, and Disability in Children With Chronic Pain: Is Affect a Mediator or Moderator?

Authors:  Subhadra Evans; Vesna Djilas; Laura C Seidman; Lonnie K Zeltzer; Jennie C I Tsao
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 5.  Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes.

Authors:  S M Meints; R R Edwards
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  Fentanyl Induces Rapid Onset Hyperalgesic Priming: Type I at Peripheral and Type II at Central Nociceptor Terminals.

Authors:  Dioneia Araldi; Eugen V Khomula; Luiz F Ferrari; Jon D Levine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The ACTTION-APS-AAPM Pain Taxonomy (AAAPT) Multidimensional Approach to Classifying Acute Pain Conditions.

Authors:  Michael L Kent; Patrick J Tighe; Inna Belfer; Timothy J Brennan; Stephen Bruehl; Chad M Brummett; Chester C Buckenmaier; Asokumar Buvanendran; Robert I Cohen; Paul Desjardins; David Edwards; Roger Fillingim; Jennifer Gewandter; Debra B Gordon; Robert W Hurley; Henrik Kehlet; John D Loeser; Sean Mackey; Samuel A McLean; Rosemary Polomano; Siamak Rahman; Srinivasa Raja; Michael Rowbotham; Santhanam Suresh; Bernard Schachtel; Kristin Schreiber; Mark Schumacher; Brett Stacey; Steven Stanos; Knox Todd; Dennis C Turk; Steven J Weisman; Christopher Wu; Daniel B Carr; Robert H Dworkin; Gregory Terman
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 8.  Psychological Characteristics of Chronic Pain: a Review of Current Evidence and Assessment Tools to Enhance Treatment.

Authors:  Rhondene M Miller; Ronald S Kaiser
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2018-03-14

9.  Life Stressors: Elevations and Disparities Among Older Adults with Pain.

Authors:  Penny L Brennan
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  CANUE: A Theoretical Model of Pain as an Antecedent for Substance Use.

Authors:  Erin Ferguson; Emily Zale; Joseph Ditre; Danielle Wesolowicz; Bethany Stennett; Michael Robinson; Jeff Boissoneault
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.