Literature DB >> 27586397

Viscoelastic, physical, and bio-degradable properties of dermal scaffolds and related cell behaviour.

Vaibhav Sharma1, Nimesha Patel, Nupur Kohli, Nivedita Ravindran, Lilian Hook, Chris Mason, Elena García-Gareta.   

Abstract

Dermal scaffolds promote healing of debilitating skin injuries caused by burns and chronic skin conditions. Currently available products present disadvantages and therefore, there is still a clinical need for developing new dermal substitutes. This study aimed at comparing the viscoelastic, physical and bio-degradable properties of two dermal scaffolds, the collagen-based and clinically well established Integra(®) and a novel fibrin-based dermal scaffold developed at our laboratory called Smart Matrix(®), to further evaluate our previous published findings that suggested a higher influx of cells, reduced wound contraction and less scarring for Smart Matrix(®) when used in vivo. Rheological results showed that Integra(®) (G'  =  313.74 kPa) is mechanically stronger than Smart Matrix(®) (G'  =  8.26 kPa), due to the presence of the silicone backing layer in Integra(®). Micro-pores were observed on both dermal scaffolds, although nano-pores as well as densely packed nano-fibres were only observed for Smart Matrix(®). Average surface roughness was higher for Smart Matrix(®) (Sa  =  114.776 nm) than for Integra(®) (Sa  =  75.565 nm). Both scaffolds possess a highly porous structure (80-90%) and display a range of pore micro-sizes that represent the actual in vivo scenario. In vitro proteolytic bio-degradation suggested that Smart Matrix(®) would degrade faster upon implantation in vivo than Integra(®). For both scaffolds, the enzymatic digestion occurs via bulk degradation. These observed differences could affect cell behaviour on both scaffolds. Our results suggest that fine-tuning of scaffolds' viscoelastic, physical and bio-degradable properties can maximise cell behaviour in terms of attachment, proliferation and infiltration, which are essential for tissue repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586397     DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/5/055001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  5 in total

Review 1.  Viscoelasticity, Like Forces, Plays a Role in Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Claudia Tanja Mierke
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  Biomimetic In Vitro Model of Cell Infiltration into Skin Scaffolds for Pre-Screening and Testing of Biomaterial-Based Therapies.

Authors:  Rafael Ballesteros-Cillero; Evan Davison-Kotler; Nupur Kohli; William S Marshall; Elena García-Gareta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  The importance of factorial design in tissue engineering and biomaterials science: Optimisation of cell seeding efficiency on dermal scaffolds as a case study.

Authors:  Alexandra Levin; Vaibhav Sharma; Lilian Hook; Elena García-Gareta
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 7.813

4.  Pre-screening the intrinsic angiogenic capacity of biomaterials in an optimised ex ovo chorioallantoic membrane model.

Authors:  Nupur Kohli; Prasad Sawadkar; Sonia Ho; Vaibhav Sharma; Martyn Snow; Sean Powell; Maria A Woodruff; Lilian Hook; Elena García-Gareta
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 7.813

Review 5.  Chronic Diabetic Wounds and Their Treatment with Skin Substitutes.

Authors:  Jordan Holl; Cezary Kowalewski; Zbigniew Zimek; Piotr Fiedor; Artur Kaminski; Tomasz Oldak; Marcin Moniuszko; Andrzej Eljaszewicz
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.600

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.