Literature DB >> 27586264

Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver: a case report and review of the literature.

Takeshi Nagai1, Kazumitsu Ueda2, Hiroyuki Hakoda1, Shinya Okata1, Shoko Nakata1, Tetsuro Taira1, Shigeo Aoki1, Hideyuki Mishima1, Akihiro Sako1, Tsunehiko Maruyama1, Minoru Okumura1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, gastrointestinal stromal tumors that have developed outside of the digestive tract have been reported. These tumors are collectively termed extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors can also develop in the liver. Only eight case reports involving primary GIST of the liver have been published. We report a case and review the literature regarding this disease. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old woman with a past history of gastric cancer visited our hospital for regular inspection. With extensive radiological imaging, a computed tomography scan revealed a mass with a size of 6.8 cm in the lateral segment of the liver. (18)F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography revealed no other malignancies except for the liver tumor. Because the lesion was suspected of being a primary malignant hepatic tumor, lateral segmentectomy was performed. The immunohistochemical analysis supported the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the liver. The patient has had no evidence of recurrence during the 10-month follow-up period; imatinib chemotherapy was not administered.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors had no characteristics that distinguished them from ordinary tumors in imaging examinations. Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors might have developed from interstitial Cajal-like cells.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Interstitial Cajal-like cells; Primary hepatic tumor; Telocytes

Year:  2016        PMID: 27586264      PMCID: PMC5009116          DOI: 10.1186/s40792-016-0218-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2198-7793


Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are thought to arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs) located in the gastrointestinal mesenchyme. The current diagnosis of GISTs is based on histological and immunohistochemical criteria, the most important of which is the expression of the receptor tyrosine kinase, KIT (CD117, c-Kit). GISTs are typically found in the gastrointestinal tract, including the stomach, small intestine, colorectum, and esophagus [1-4]. The number of case reports involving GISTs in the extra-gastrointestinal sites have been increasing. These cases are designated as extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) [5]. However, ICCs have not been identified in the liver; thus, primary GISTs occurring in the liver have been evaluated. From around the year 2000, many groups have become interested in whether or not ICCs are present outside of the gastrointestinal tract; peculiar interstitial cells have been found in the upper and lower urinary tracts, blood vessels, pancreas, and other sites. Such cells have been named interstitial Cajal-like cells (ICLCs) [6]. Furthermore, ICLCs have been discovered in human liver fibrosis by Fu et al. [7]; therefore, primary GISTs might originate from the liver. We report a rare case of primary hepatic GIST and a review of the literature.

Case presentation

A Japanese female patient underwent distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for gastric cancer when she was 63 years old. The cancer was a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with serosa invasion, and lymph node involvement was found. However, no liver tumor was detected during radiological examination at the initial operation. In addition, extensive microscopic examination of the resected stomach revealed no GISTs, with the exception of gastric adenocarcinoma. Seven years after surgery, an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a 6-cm mass in the left lateral segment of the liver, and peripheral enhancement in the arterial phase with a heterogenous appearance (Fig. 1a, b). The left portal vein and bile ducts in the lateral segment were not involved. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a well-defined mass with hypointensity relative to the liver parenchyma on T1-weighted images (Fig. 2a) and moderate hyperintensity on T2-weighted images (Fig. 2b). The bile ducts in the left lateral sector were not dilated. The mass showed hyperintensity on diffusion-weighted images. In the late dynamic and hepatobiliary phases, the hepatic tumor exhibited clear hypointensity on ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-MRI. 18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) was performed to rule out the presence of metastases throughout the body. The hepatic mass showed 18F-FDG uptake with a maximum standardized uptake value of 6.3; however, no other sites of hot 18F-FDG uptake were demonstrated (Fig. 3). Upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopic examinations did not suggest the presence of any other neoplastic lesions. Laboratory findings including levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and alpha-fetoprotein were within normal limits.
Fig. 1

CT scan showing a large and round mass in the left hepatic lobe. The irregular low-density area resembling a mosaic pattern was found during the arterial (a) and portal phases (b)

Fig. 2

MRI scan showing a low- and high-intensity tumor on T1-weighted phase images (a) and T2-weighted phase images (b), respectively

Fig. 3

18F-FDG PET image showing avid FDG accumulation in the left hepatic mass (maximum standardized uptake value = 6.3)

CT scan showing a large and round mass in the left hepatic lobe. The irregular low-density area resembling a mosaic pattern was found during the arterial (a) and portal phases (b) MRI scan showing a low- and high-intensity tumor on T1-weighted phase images (a) and T2-weighted phase images (b), respectively 18F-FDG PET image showing avid FDG accumulation in the left hepatic mass (maximum standardized uptake value = 6.3) The patient underwent left lateral segmentectomy of the liver because of the possibility of a primary hepatic malignancy. Intraoperative findings indicated that the hepatic tumor was palpable with a hard elastic consistency and had no lymph node involvement; no gastrointestinal tumor was found in the abdominal cavity. The hepatic tumor and the adjacent small intestine adhered firmly to each other, and thus, combined resection was performed. On gross evaluation, the hepatic tumor was well circumscribed and measured 6.8 × 5.5 cm. In cross section, the tumor had a whitish-tan color to the cut surface and focal necrotic and cystic portions (Fig. 4). No malignancies were detected in the resected adjacent small intestine.
Fig. 4

Photograph showing the gross appearance of the dissected tumor. On evaluation, the hepatic tumor was well circumscribed and measured 6.8 × 5.5 cm

Photograph showing the gross appearance of the dissected tumor. On evaluation, the hepatic tumor was well circumscribed and measured 6.8 × 5.5 cm Microscopically, the hepatic tumor was composed of spindle cells with pleomorphic nuclei arranged into short fascicles. The mitotic count was 35–40 mitoses per 50 high-power fields (HPFs) (Fig. 5a). Immunohistochemical staining for KIT, CD34, S-100, smooth muscle actin, and desmin was performed. Positive results were observed for KIT and CD34 (Fig. 5b, c). The pathological findings indicated the presence of GISTs in the liver. Fletcher’s risk score indicated advanced-stage disease [1].
Fig. 5

Photomicrographs of stained tumor sections. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of spindle cells with pleomorphic nuclei arranged into fascicles (hematoxylin-eosin stain, ×200) (a). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were diffusely positive for KIT (b) and CD34 (c) (×200)

Photomicrographs of stained tumor sections. Microscopically, the tumor consisted of spindle cells with pleomorphic nuclei arranged into fascicles (hematoxylin-eosin stain, ×200) (a). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were diffusely positive for KIT (b) and CD34 (c) (×200) Adjuvant therapy such as imatinib was not administered continuously because of adverse events involving general malaise and anorexia. The patient recovered well from the side effects and exhibited no evidence of recurrence during the 10-month follow-up period. No other tumors except for the hepatic tumor were identified pre- and intra-operatively in the present case; moreover, no neoplastic lesions were identified after surgical treatment without chemotherapy. We made a final diagnosis of primary hepatic GIST.

Discussion

GISTs are specific mesenchymal tumors located in regions of the gastrointestinal tract such as in the stomach (60–70 %), small intestine (20–25 %), colon and rectum (5 %), and esophagus (<5 %) [2]. However, in recent years, GISTs have been reported outside of the gastrointestinal tract as apparent primary tumors. They can also occur in the omentum, mesentery, retroperitoneum, urinary bladder, ureter, uterus, pancreas, and gall bladder [8-16]. They are designated as EGISTs [5]. According to Miettinen and Lasota, the frequency of EGISTs is ≤1 % of all GISTs of defined origin [17]. A PubMed search was performed using the keywords: “gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” “extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors,” “primary hepatic tumor,” and limited to reports on human adults and English and Japanese-language publications, including case reports. Primary GIST of the liver is a type of EGIST; only eight previous case studies involving this tumor have been reported in the literature until 2015 [18-25]. The clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of the reported primary hepatic GISTs, including the present case, are detailed in Table 1. The patients included six men and three women whose ages ranged from 17 to 79 years (mean, 56 years). There was a distinct predominance of male patients. Four of the nine patients had been asymptomatic, but five had presented with shortness of breath, abdominal fullness, loss of appetite, hypochondriac pain, nausea, and indigestion. The tumors ranged in size from 5.1 to 20 cm with a median size of 9.5 cm. Seven patients had unilobar tumors, and eight patients had solitary tumors in the liver.
Table 1

The clinicopathological findings and treatment outcomes of reported cases of primary hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AuthorYearAgeSexPresentationLocationSize (cm)Cell typeMitotic counts (no./50 HPF)CTMRI (T1/T2/DWI/hepatobiliary phase)PET (SUV max)ProcedureRecurrence (treatment)Outcome
1Hu et al. [18]200379FShortness of breathRight lobe15Spindle20LowNANAR-HTxHepatic hilar LN (Surgery)Alive (20 months)
2De Chiara et al. [19]200637MAsymptomS518Spindle20LowNANAPartial HTxMultiple lung meta (imatinib)Alive (36 months)
3Ochiai et al. [20]200930MAbdominal fullnessBilateral lobe>10Mixed75LowNANA(1) L-Trisegmentec tomy(2) Partial HTx and gastrectomy(3) Partial HTx and resection of the thoracic operative scar(1) Residual liver (surgery)(2) Residual liver and thoracic operative scar (surgery and imatinib)Alive (66 months)
4Luo et al. [21]200917MAsymptomAnterior segment5.1Spindle0LowNANARFANED (none)Alive (3 months)
5Yamamoto et al. [22]201070MLoss of appetiteLeft lobe20Epithelioid1LowNANAL-HTxNED (NA)NA
6Bo et al. [23]201456MAsymptomRight lobe9.5Spindle<5LowHigh/low/−/−NACentral HTxNED (none)Alive (12 months)
7Louis et al. [24]201455FHypochondriac painS3/S2/S6/S818/6/6/6Spindle10LowNAPositiveSegmentectomy (S3) and partial resection ×3NED (imatinib)Alive (6 months)
8Kim et al. [25]201471MNausea and indigestionLateral segment and peritoneal seeding7Spindle30LowLow/high/high/lowPositive (6.9)Lateral segmentectomy, resection of disseminated tumorsResidual peritoneal tumor (imatinib)Dead (19 months)
9present case201570FAsymptomLateral segment6.8Spindle35LowLow/high/high/lowPositive (6.3)Lateral segmentectomyNED (none)Alive (6 months)

HTx hepatectomy, RFA radio-frequency ablation, NA not available, NED no evidence of disease

The clinicopathological findings and treatment outcomes of reported cases of primary hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors HTx hepatectomy, RFA radio-frequency ablation, NA not available, NED no evidence of disease All hepatic GISTs demonstrated hypoattenuation on CT scans. MRI was performed for three patients, but no characteristic findings were obtained. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) was performed in three patients, and high accumulation of 18FDG was found in their hepatic tumors. All patients had undergone surgery, with the exception of only one who had been treated with radiofrequency ablation. Morphologically, GISTs can be subdivided into spindle cells, epithelioid cells, and mixed types. Seven of the nine cases were the spindle cell type, one was the epithelioid cell type, and one was the mixed cell type. The mitotic count in the tumor ranged from 0 to 75 per 50 HPFs, with a median of 20 per 50 HPFs. Fletcher et al. [1] proposed a “risk of aggressive behavior” classification of GISTs based only on the tumor size and HPF mitotic count. The risk stratification divides tumors into very low-, low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories based on size (<2, 2–5, 5–10, and >10 cm) and on the number of mitoses per 50 HPFs, typically reported as <5, 5–10, or >10. The mitotic counts were associated with the recurrence and metastasis of the disease. According to a classification that estimated the risk of aggressive behavior, five of nine cases showed high-risk tumors, including the present case. The histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of EGISTs are similar to those of GISTs [23]. Five cases had high mitotic counts of over 20 per 50 HPFs and, with the exception of the present case, had developed metastases or recurrence. Four patients had received imatinib chemotherapy, one patient underwent adjuvant therapy, two of three patients with recurrence were effectively treated and remained alive for 36 and 66 months, and the other patient died of the disease. Patients with recurrent tumors could be expected to achieve long-term survival if they had received chemotherapies continuously. The present case can be considered a primary hepatic GIST because of the following two findings. First, preoperative gastroscopy and colonoscopy imaging studies and extensive pathological examination of the resected stomach failed to detect any other GISTs, except for a hepatic tumor. Second, there was no evidence of recurrence and no neoplastic lesions after hepatectomy in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. ICCs are normally present in the myenteric plexus of the gastrointestinal tract, and they have not been identified in the liver. Consequently, is it possible that primary GISTs can occur in the liver? We initially suspected that primary hepatic GISTs might originate from the biliary system in the liver. Ahmadi et al. reported that ICCs were identified in the extrahepatic bile ducts [10]; unfortunately, the existence of ICCs was not recognized in intrahepatic bile ducts. However, Popescu et al. demonstrated that ICCs are present in human exocrine pancreas; such cells were named pancreatic ICC and later called ICLCs [8]. Subsequently, ICLCs were identified in many sites such as the following: the upper and lower urinary tracts, blood vessels, pancreas, male and female reproductive tracts, mammary glands, placenta, the heart, and the gut. Recently, ICLCs have been mostly referred to as telocytes (TCs) [6]. Padhi et al. reviewed 19 reported cases of pancreatic extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors and concluded that with the discovery and characterization of pancreatic TCs, the origin of stromal tumors reminiscent of GIST seemed a real possibility [26]. Furthermore, Fu et al. have reported that TCs were identified in the liver and were diminished in liver fibrosis [7]. Regardless, TCs have not been identified in the normal liver; primary GISTs might have developed from TCs in the liver. Further investigations regarding the relationship between hepatic GISTs and TCs are necessary.

Conclusions

Primary GIST of the liver is very rare, and only eight cases have been previously reported. Primary hepatic GISTs had no characteristics to distinguish them from ordinary ones on CT and MRI scans and also regarding histopathological findings. Primary hepatic GISTs might have developed from ICLCs, but further investigations are necessary.
  26 in total

1.  Stromal tumor of the gallbladder with phenotype of interstitial cells of Cajal: a previously unrecognized neoplasm.

Authors:  C Ortiz-Hidalgo; B de Leon Bojorge; J Albores-Saavedra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Primary GIST of the liver masquerading as primary intra-abdominal tumour: a rare extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumour (EGIST) of the liver.

Authors:  A Robert Louis; Shivendra Singh; Sunil K Gupta; Anila Sharma
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-09

3.  Primary large gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver: report of a case.

Authors:  Toshiya Ochiai; Teruhisa Sonoyama; Shojiro Kikuchi; Hisashi Ikoma; Takeshi Kubota; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Daisuke Ichikawa; Shijiro Kikuchi; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Kazuma Okamoto; Chohei Sakakura; Yukihito Kokuba; Hiroki Taniguchi; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver with lung metastases successfully treated with STI-571 (imatinib mesylate).

Authors:  Annarosaria De Chiara; Vincenzo De Rosa; Secondo Lastoria; Renato Franco; Gerardo Botti; Vincenzo Rosario Iaffaioli; Gaetano Apice
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2006-01-01

Review 5.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  M Miettinen; J Lasota
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Interstitial cells in the human prostate: a new therapeutic target?

Authors:  Frank Van der Aa; Tania Roskams; Wim Blyweert; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver with PDGFRA gene mutation.

Authors:  Hidetaka Yamamoto; Yuichi Miyamoto; Yunosuke Nishihara; Aya Kojima; Masakazu Imamura; Keiji Kishikawa; Yukari Takase; Keisuke Ario; Yoshinao Oda; Masazumi Tsuneyoshi
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 8.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach.

Authors:  Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the liver: a case report.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Luo; Dan Liu; Jian-Jun Yang; Min-Wen Zheng; Jing Zhang; Xiao-Dong Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Pancreatic extragastrointestinal stromal tumors, interstitial Cajal like cells, and telocytes.

Authors:  Somanath Padhi; Rajlaxmi Sarangi; Saumyaranjan Mallick
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2013-01-10
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A Rare Case of a Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST): a Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hamzeh Saraireh; Obada Tayyem; Omar Al Asad; Ranjana Nawgiri; Issam Alawin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2019-12

2.  A case of primary hepatic stromal tumour misdiagnosed as a liver cyst.

Authors:  Fei Liu; Si-Hua Wu; Qiang-Qiang Sun; Sheng-Hai Liu; De-Fa Hou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.573

3.  Primary hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor with right adrenal gland invasion: A case report and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Liangliang Xu; Ming Zhang; Mingqing Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of primary hepatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Qian; Ying-Cai Yan; Bing-Qiang Gao; Wei-Lin Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.