Literature DB >> 27585691

Development and Alpha-testing of a Stepped Decision Aid for Patients Considering Nonsurgical Options for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Management.

Karine Toupin April1, Tamara Rader2, Gillian A Hawker2, Dawn Stacey2, Annette M O'Connor2, Vivian Welch2, Anne Lyddiatt2, Jessie McGowan2, J Carter Thorne2, Carol Bennett2, Jordi Pardo Pardo2, George A Wells2, Peter Tugwell2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop an innovative stepped patient decision aid (StDA) comparing the benefits and harms of 13 nonsurgical treatment options for managing osteoarthritis (OA) and to evaluate its acceptability and effects on informed decision making.
METHODS: Guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards, the process involved (1) developing a decision aid with evidence on 13 nonsurgical treatments from the 2012 American College of Rheumatology OA clinical practice guidelines; and (2) interviewing patients with OA and healthcare providers to test its acceptability and effects on knowledge and decisional conflict.
RESULTS: The StDA helped make the decision explicit, and presented evidence on 13 OA treatments clustered into 5 steps or levels according to their benefits and harms. Probabilities of benefits and harms were presented using pictograms of 100 faces formatted to allow comparisons across sets of options. It also included a values clarification exercise and knowledge test. Feedback was obtained from 49 patients and 7 healthcare providers. They found that the StDA presented evidence in a clear manner, and helped patients clarify their values and make an informed decision. Some participants found that there was too much information and others said that there was not enough on each treatment option.
CONCLUSION: This innovative StDA allows patients to consider both the evidence and their values for multiple options. The findings are being used to revise and plan future evaluation. The StDA is an example of how research evidence in guidelines can be implemented in practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DECISION AID; DECISION MAKING; OSTEOARTHRITIS

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27585691     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.150736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  2 in total

Review 1.  Medication Risk Communication in Rheumatology: Where Are We and Where Do We Go from Here?

Authors:  Susan J Blalock
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  User testing of a hypospadias decision aid prototype at a pediatric medical conference.

Authors:  Katherine H Chan; Rosalia Misseri; Aaron Carroll; Richard M Frankel; Courtney Moore; Brandon Cockrum; Sarah Wiehe
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 1.830

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.