Literature DB >> 27585509

Genetic Screening of Anderson-Fabry Disease in Probands Referred From Multispecialty Clinics.

Valentina Favalli1, Eliana Disabella1, Mariadelfina Molinaro2, Marilena Tagliani1, Anna Scarabotto1, Alessandra Serio1, Maurizia Grasso1, Nupoor Narula3, Carmela Giorgianni1, Clelia Caspani1, Monica Concardi1, Manuela Agozzino1, Calogero Giordano1, Alexandra Smirnova1, Takahide Kodama4, Lorenzo Giuliani1, Elena Antoniazzi5, Riccardo G Borroni6, Camilla Vassallo7, Filippo Mangione8, Laura Scelsi9, Stefano Ghio9, Carlo Pellegrini10, Marialuisa Zedde11, Laura Fancellu12, GianPietro Sechi12, Antonello Ganau13, Stefania Piga13, Annarita Colucci14, Daniela Concolino15, Maria Teresa Di Mascio16, Danilo Toni16, Marina Diomedi17, Claudio Rapezzi18, Elena Biagini18, Massimiliano Marini19, Maurizia Rasura20, Maurizio Melis21, Antonia Nucera22, Donata Guidetti23, Michelangelo Mancuso24, Umberto Scoditti25, Pamela Cassini1, Jagat Narula26, Luigi Tavazzi27, Eloisa Arbustini28.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disease, caused by defects of the alpha-galactosidase A (GLA) gene. AFD can affect the heart, brain, kidney, eye, skin, peripheral nerves, and gastrointestinal tract. Cardiology (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), neurology (cryptogenic stroke), and nephrology (end-stage renal failure) screening studies suggest the prevalence of GLA variants is 0.62%, with diagnosis confirmation in 0.12%.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to expand screening from these settings to include ophthalmology, dermatology, gastroenterology, internal medicine, pediatrics, and medical genetics to increase diagnostic yield and comprehensively evaluate organ involvement in AFD patients.
METHODS: In a 10-year prospective multidisciplinary, multicenter study, we expanded clinical, genetic, and biochemical screening to consecutive patients enrolled from all aforementioned clinical settings. We tested the GLA gene and α-galactosidase A activity in plasma and leukocytes. Inclusion criteria comprised phenotypical traits and absence of male-to-male transmission. Screening was extended to relatives of probands harboring GLA mutations.
RESULTS: Of 2,034 probands fulfilling inclusion criteria, 37 (1.8%) were carriers of GLA mutations. Cascade family screening identified 60 affected relatives; clinical data were available for 4 affected obligate carriers. Activity of α-galactosidase A in plasma and leukocytes was diagnostic in male subjects, but not in female subjects. Of the 101 family members harboring mutations, 86 were affected, 10 were young healthy carriers, and 5 refused clinical evaluation. In the 86 patients, involved organs or organ systems included the heart (69%), peripheral nerves (46%), kidney (45%), eye (37%), brain (34%), skin (32%), gastrointestinal tract (31%), and auditory system (19%). Globotriaosylceramide accumulated in organ-specific and non-organ-specific cells in atypical and classic variants, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening probands with clinically suspected AFD significantly increased diagnostic yield. The heart was the organ most commonly involved, independent of the clinical setting in which the patient was first evaluated.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLA; MOGE(S) classification; biochemical; family screening; multidisciplinary evaluation; α-Gal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27585509     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  18 in total

Review 1.  Complex roads from genotype to phenotype in dilated cardiomyopathy: scientific update from the Working Group of Myocardial Function of the European Society of Cardiology.

Authors:  Antoine Bondue; Eloisa Arbustini; Anna Bianco; Michele Ciccarelli; Dana Dawson; Matteo De Rosa; Nazha Hamdani; Denise Hilfiker-Kleiner; Benjamin Meder; Adelino F Leite-Moreira; Thomas Thum; Carlo G Tocchetti; Gilda Varricchi; Jolanda Van der Velden; Roddy Walsh; Stephane Heymans
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 10.787

2.  KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew S Levey; Patricia L Adams; Josefina Alberú; Mohamed A Bakr; Lorenzo Gallon; Catherine A Garvey; Sandeep Guleria; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Dorry L Segev; Sandra J Taler; Kazunari Tanabe; Linda Wright; Martin G Zeier; Michael Cheung; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Intraoperative Diagnosis of Anderson-Fabry Disease in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Surgical Myectomy.

Authors:  Franco Cecchi; Maria Iascone; Niccolò Maurizi; Laura Pezzoli; Irene Binaco; Elena Biagini; Maria Laura Fibbi; Iacopo Olivotto; Federico Pieruzzi; Ana Fruntelata; Lucian Dorobantu; Claudio Rapezzi; Paolo Ferrazzi
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 4.  2021 TSOC Expert Consensus on the Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Cardiac Manifestations of Fabry Disease.

Authors:  Chung-Lieh Hung; Yen-Wen Wu; Chih-Chan Lin; Chih-Hung Lai; Jimmy Jyh-Ming Juang; Ting-Hsing Chao; Ling Kuo; Kuo-Tzu Sung; Chao-Yung Wang; Chun-Li Wang; Chun-Yuan Chu; Wen-Chung Yu; Charles Jia-Yin Hou
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 5.  Fabry disease and kidney involvement: starting from childhood to understand the future.

Authors:  Roberto Chimenz; Valeria Chirico; Caterina Cuppari; Giorgia Ceravolo; Daniela Concolino; Paolo Monardo; Antonio Lacquaniti
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.651

6.  Description of a New GLA Gene Variant in a Patient with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Is it Fabry Disease?

Authors:  Marcelo Imbroinise Bittencourt
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Diagnosis and Screening of Patients with Fabry Disease.

Authors:  Irfan Vardarli; Christoph Rischpler; Ken Herrmann; Frank Weidemann
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Pathologic substrate of gastropathy in Anderson-Fabry disease.

Authors:  Alessandro Di Toro; Nupoor Narula; Lorenzo Giuliani; Monica Concardi; Alexandra Smirnova; Valentina Favalli; Mario Urtis; Costanza Alvisi; Elena Antoniazzi; Eloisa Arbustini
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.123

9.  Serum Biomarkers of Endothelial Dysfunction in Fabry Associated Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jefferson Loso; Natalie Lund; Maxim Avanesov; Nicole Muschol; Susanne Lezius; Kathrin Cordts; Edzard Schwedhelm; Monica Patten
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-08-15

10.  Effectiveness of plasma lyso-Gb3 as a biomarker for selecting high-risk patients with Fabry disease from multispecialty clinics for genetic analysis.

Authors:  Hiroki Maruyama; Kaori Miyata; Mariko Mikame; Atsumi Taguchi; Chu Guili; Masaru Shimura; Kei Murayama; Takeshi Inoue; Saori Yamamoto; Koichiro Sugimura; Koichi Tamita; Toshihiro Kawasaki; Jun Kajihara; Akifumi Onishi; Hitoshi Sugiyama; Teiko Sakai; Ichijiro Murata; Takamasa Oda; Shigeru Toyoda; Kenichiro Hanawa; Takeo Fujimura; Shigehisa Ura; Mimiko Matsumura; Hideki Takano; Satoshi Yamashita; Gaku Matsukura; Ryushi Tazawa; Tsuyoshi Shiga; Mio Ebato; Hiroshi Satoh; Satoshi Ishii
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.