Literature DB >> 27584006

Is the Partners in Recovery program connecting with the intended population of people living with severe and persistent mental illness? What are their prioritised needs?

Nicola Hancock1, Jennifer Smith-Merry1, James A Gillespie2, Ivy Yen2.   

Abstract

Objective The Partners in Recovery (PIR) program is an Australian government initiative designed to make the mental health and social care sectors work in more coordinated ways to meet the needs of those with severe and complex mental illness. Herein we reflect on demographic data collected during evaluation of PIR implementation in two Western Sydney sites. The aims of the present study were to: (1) explore whether two Sydney-based PIR programs had recruited their intended population, namely people living with severe and persistent mental illness; and (2) learn more about this relatively unknown population and their self-identified need priorities. Methods Routinely collected initial client assessment data were analysed descriptively. Results The data suggest that the two programs are engaging the intended population. The highest unmet needs identified included psychological distress, lack of daytime activities and company, poor physical health and inadequate accommodation. Some groups remain hard to connect, including people from Aboriginal and other culturally diverse communities. Conclusions The data confirm that the PIR program, at least in the two regions evaluated, is mostly reaching its intended audience. Some data were being collected inconsistently, limiting the usefulness of the data and the ability to build on PIR findings to develop ongoing support for this population. What is known about the topic? PIR is a unique national program funded to engage with and address the needs of Australians living with severe and persistent mental illness by facilitating service access. What does this paper add? This paper reports on recruitment of people living with severe and persistent mental illness, their need priorities and data collection. These are three central elements to successful roll-out of the much anticipated mental health component of the National Disability Insurance Scheme, as well as ongoing PIR operation. What are the implications for practitioners? Active recruitment, exploration of self-reported need priorities and routine outcome measurement are essential yet challenging work practices when working with people living with severe and persistent mental illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27584006     DOI: 10.1071/AH15248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  3 in total

1.  Unintentional drug-related deaths in people with mental illness in NSW Australia, 2012-2016: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Smith-Merry; Kenji Fujita; Tim Chen; Andrew Baillie
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 2.  NDIS Participants with Psychosocial Disabilities and Life-Limiting Diagnoses: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kathy Boschen; Caroline Phelan; Sharon Lawn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Understanding the ups and downs of living well: the voices of people experiencing early mental health recovery.

Authors:  Nicola Hancock; Jennifer Smith-Merry; Glenda Jessup; Sarah Wayland; Allison Kokany
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.630

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.