Literature DB >> 27583809

Operationalizing NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) in naturalistic clinical settings.

Carla Sharp1,2, J Christopher Fowler2,3, Ramiro Salas3, David Nielsen3,4, Jon Allen2,3, John Oldham2,3, Thomas Kosten4, Sanjay Mathew2,3, Alok Madan2,3, B Christopher Frueh2,5, Peter Fonagy2,6.   

Abstract

Recently, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) introduced the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative to address two major challenges facing the field of psychiatry: (1) the lack of new effective personalized treatments for psychiatric disorders, and (2) the limitations associated with categorically defined psychiatric disorders. Although the potential of RDoC to revolutionize personalized psychiatric medicine and psychiatric nosology has been acknowledged, it is unclear how to implement RDoC in naturalistic clinical settings as part of routine outcomes research. In this article, the authors present the major RDoC principles and then show how these principles are operationalized in The Menninger Clinic's McNair Initiative for Neuroscience Discovery-Menninger & Baylor College of Medicine (MIND-MB) study. The authors discuss how RDoC-informed outcomes-based assessment in clinical settings can transform personalized clinical care through multimodal treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27583809     DOI: 10.1521/bumc.2016.80.3.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Menninger Clin        ISSN: 0025-9284


  2 in total

1.  The roles of early-life adversity and rumination in neural response to emotional faces amongst anxious and depressed adults.

Authors:  Amy T Peters; Katie L Burkhouse; Kerry L Kinney; K. Luan Phan
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 2.  Empirically supported interventions in psychology: contributions of Research Domain Criteria.

Authors:  Rita Pasion; Eva C Martins; Fernando Barbosa
Journal:  Psicol Reflex Crit       Date:  2019-07-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.