| Literature DB >> 27583792 |
Olga Bajenova1,2, Anna Gorbunova1, Igor Evsyukov1, Michael Rayko1, Svetlana Gapon3, Ekaterina Bozhokina4, Alexander Shishkin5, Stephen J O'Brien1,6.
Abstract
Сarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA, CEACAM5, CD66) is a promoter of metastasis in epithelial cancers that is widely used as a prognostic clinical marker of metastasis. The aim of this study is to identify the network of genes that are associated with CEA-induced colorectal cancer liver metastasis. We compared the genome-wide transcriptomic profiles of CEA positive (MIP101 clone 8) and CEA negative (MIP 101) colorectal cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential in vivo. The CEA-producing cells displayed quantitative changes in the level of expression for 100 genes (over-expressed or down-regulated). They were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR. The KEGG pathway analysis identified 4 significantly enriched pathways: cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, MAPK signaling pathway, TGF-beta signaling pathway and pyrimidine metabolism. Our results suggest that CEA production by colorectal cancer cells triggers colorectal cancer progression by inducing the epithelial- mesenchymal transition, increasing tumor cell invasiveness into the surrounding tissues and suppressing stress and apoptotic signaling. The novel gene expression distinctions establish the relationships between the existing cancer markers and implicate new potential biomarkers for colorectal cancer hepatic metastasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27583792 PMCID: PMC5008809 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1The top 30 upregulated and downregulated genes in CEA+ and CEA- cells.
The red color indicates upregulated mRNA; the blue color indicates downregulated mRNA. On the right side of the square are the names of the genes that differ in the expression between MIP101 (CEA-) and MIP101 clone 8 (CEA +) cell lines. The experiments were performed in two replicates starting from RNA extraction. As a control, we performed an analysis of the CEA gene and its isoforms expression level in these cell lines by RNA-seq data. Fig 2 shows plots of the CEA expression. Expression of the CEA gene is present in the CEA-producing line (MIP101 clone 8) and absent in the CEA-deficient cell line (MIP101). Moreover, CEA gene was represented by one isoform CEACAM5-001 (Fig 2B).
Fig 2Differential expression analysis results for CEA (CEACAM5) gene.
a. Expression plot shows differences in the CEACAM5 expression level between MIP101 (CEA-, blue color) and MIP101 clone 8 (CEA+, brown color) cell lines, measured in FPKM. Each sample was represented by two replicates. b. Expression level of CEACAM5 is represented by single CEACAM5-001 isoform.
Top 10 functional enriched GO biological processes regulated by CEA expression level in MIP101 colorectal cancer cells.
| Gene ontology term ID | Term name | P-value | FDR q-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GO:0008283 | Cell proliferation | 5.67E-09 | 2.20E-06 | |
| GO:0006915 | Apoptosis | 1.87E-07 | 2.47E-05 | |
| GO:0006950 | Response to stress | 7.40E-06 | 5.09E-04 | |
| GO:0008544 | Epidermis development | 1.21E-05 | 7.67E-04 | |
| GO:0007398 | Ectoderm development | 1.94E-05 | 1.14E-03 | |
| GO:0050793 | Regulation of developmental process | 2.65E-05 | 1.46E-03 | |
| GO:0007165 | Signal transduction | 8.28E-05 | 4.02E-03 | |
| GO:0006350 | Transcription | 1.19E-04 | 5.46E-03 | |
| GO:0009888 | Tissue development | 1.63E-04 | 6.37E-03 | |
| GO:0006139 | Nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process | 1.64E-04 | 6.37E-03 | |
Molecular pathway analysis of genes regulated by CEA expression level in MIP101 cells by KEGG database.
| Description | P-value | FDR q-value |
|---|---|---|
| Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction | 1.50E-05 | 1.40E-03 |
| MAPK signaling pathway | 1.50E-05 | 1.40E-03 |
| TGF-beta signaling pathway | 6.61E-04 | 4.10E-02 |
| Pyrimidine metabolism | 9.66E-04 | 4.49E-02 |
Phenotype-related genes in MIP101 clone 8 cells with CEA over-expression.
| Gene name | Description | Log2 fold change | P-value | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| transforming growth factor, beta 2 | 2.09 | 1.14E-04 | 1.38E-02 | |
| vascular endothelial growth factor A | -2.08 | 1.15E-06 | 2.69E-04 | |
| chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 5 | -8.87 | 2.27E-11 | 1.59E-08 | |
| tumor necrosis factor (ligand) superfamily, member 15 | -2.15 | 1.60E-04 | 1.80E-02 | |
| fibroblast growth factor 21 | -4.18 | 2.38E-06 | 5.20E-04 | |
| growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, alpha | -2.28 | 1.60E-13 | 1.52E-10 | |
| heat shock 70kDa protein 1B | 3.24 | 3.06E-10 | 1.75E-07 | |
| mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6 | -3.75 | 1.70E-04 | 1.90E-02 | |
| melanoma antigen family D, 1 | 2.07 | 1.14E-11 | 8.43E-09 | |
| Kruppel-like factor 11 | -2.61 | 3.25E-05 | 4.77E-03 |
Fig 3Validation of RNA-Seq results was performed by qRT-PCR analysis on 5 randomly chosen genes from the list of differentially expressed genes.
CEACAM5 also was analysed as positive control. Results obtained by RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR methods show high accordance. Each qRT-PCR was performed with three replicates. All data are means ± SD. (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA for qRT-PCR and FDR-adjusted exact test for RNA-Seq).