F Olivier1, V Bertelle2, P S Shah3, C Drolet1, B Piedboeuf1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Université Laval, CHU de Québec, Québec, Québec, Canada. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Université de Sherbrooke, Hôpital Fleurimont, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, Maternal-Infant Care Research Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between birth route and late-onset sepsis (LOS), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcal (CONS)-related LOS in preterm neonates. STUDY DESIGN: In this observational study, data from 20,038 infants born between 22 and 32 weeks' gestation and admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units between 2010 and 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The impact of birth route on LOS was assessed using univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 8218 neonates were born via vaginal route and 11,820 via cesarean section. Incidence rates of LOS for infants born vaginally and via a cesarean section were 13.1 and 13.2%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in odds of LOS between the groups (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.99; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12); however, the odds of CONS sepsis were higher in the cesarean group (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.32). CONCLUSION: Birth route did not have an impact on LOS, but was associated with CONS-related LOS.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between birth route and late-onset sepsis (LOS), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcal (CONS)-related LOS in preterm neonates. STUDY DESIGN: In this observational study, data from 20,038 infants born between 22 and 32 weeks' gestation and admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units between 2010 and 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. The impact of birth route on LOS was assessed using univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 8218 neonates were born via vaginal route and 11,820 via cesarean section. Incidence rates of LOS for infants born vaginally and via a cesarean section were 13.1 and 13.2%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in odds of LOS between the groups (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.99; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.12); however, the odds of CONS sepsis were higher in the cesarean group (AOR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.32). CONCLUSION: Birth route did not have an impact on LOS, but was associated with CONS-related LOS.
Authors: María Carmen Collado; María Cernada; Josef Neu; Gaspar Pérez-Martínez; María Gormaz; Máximo Vento Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Janet E Berrington; Christopher J Stewart; Stephen P Cummings; Nicholas D Embleton Journal: Curr Opin Infect Dis Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.915
Authors: John Penders; Carel Thijs; Cornelis Vink; Foekje F Stelma; Bianca Snijders; Ischa Kummeling; Piet A van den Brandt; Ellen E Stobberingh Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Maria G Dominguez-Bello; Elizabeth K Costello; Monica Contreras; Magda Magris; Glida Hidalgo; Noah Fierer; Rob Knight Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brandon Brooks; Brian A Firek; Christopher S Miller; Itai Sharon; Brian C Thomas; Robyn Baker; Michael J Morowitz; Jillian F Banfield Journal: Microbiome Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Rebecca Milton; David Gillespie; Calie Dyer; Khadijeh Taiyari; Maria J Carvalho; Kathryn Thomson; Kirsty Sands; Edward A R Portal; Kerenza Hood; Ana Ferreira; Thomas Hender; Nigel Kirby; Jordan Mathias; Maria Nieto; William J Watkins; Delayehu Bekele; Mahlet Abayneh; Semaria Solomon; Sulagna Basu; Ranjan K Nandy; Bijan Saha; Kenneth Iregbu; Fatima Z Modibbo; Stella Uwaezuoke; Rabaab Zahra; Haider Shirazi; Syed U Najeeb; Jean-Baptiste Mazarati; Aniceth Rucogoza; Lucie Gaju; Shaheen Mehtar; Andre N H Bulabula; Andrew C Whitelaw; Timothy R Walsh; Grace J Chan Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 38.927