E Weiner1, H Miremberg1, E Grinstein1, Y Mizrachi1, L Schreiber2, J Bar1, M Kovo1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Holon, Israel. 2. Department of Pathology, The Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Holon, Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical characteristics and placental histopathology between pregnancies complicated by placenta previa and controls. STUDY DESIGN: Between 2009 and 2015, cesarean deliveries (CDs) of 119 pregnancies with placenta previa were identified from which maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes and placental pathology were reviewed. Results were compared with CDs matched for maternal age and pregnancy complications (control group, n=119). Placental lesions were classified into maternal and fetal vascular supply lesions and inflammatory response. Composite neonatal outcome was defined as one or more of early neonatal complications. Small-for-gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight ⩽10th percentile. RESULTS: Placentas from the previa group had higher rates of weights <10th percentile (P<0.001) and of maternal and fetal vascular supply lesions (P<0.001, for both). Higher rate of SGA (P=0.003) and worse composite neonatal outcome (P<0.001) were also observed in the previa group as compared with controls. After controlling for potential confounding bias using multivariable logistic regression models, placenta previa remained statistically significantly associated with placental maternal (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-4.9, P=0.009) and fetal (aOR 7.05, 95% CI 2.4-20.2, P<0.001) vascular supply lesions, SGA (aOR 10, 95% CI 2.3-44.2, P=0.002) and adverse neonatal outcome (aOR 6.87, 95% CI 2.9-11.8, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: More placental vascular supply lesions, higher rate of SGA and worse neonatal outcome characterized pregnancies with placenta previa in the current study. These findings may suggest that abnormal placentation is accompanied by suboptimal implantation that interferes with fetal growth.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical characteristics and placental histopathology between pregnancies complicated by placenta previa and controls. STUDY DESIGN: Between 2009 and 2015, cesarean deliveries (CDs) of 119 pregnancies with placenta previa were identified from which maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes and placental pathology were reviewed. Results were compared with CDs matched for maternal age and pregnancy complications (control group, n=119). Placental lesions were classified into maternal and fetal vascular supply lesions and inflammatory response. Composite neonatal outcome was defined as one or more of early neonatal complications. Small-for-gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight ⩽10th percentile. RESULTS: Placentas from the previa group had higher rates of weights <10th percentile (P<0.001) and of maternal and fetal vascular supply lesions (P<0.001, for both). Higher rate of SGA (P=0.003) and worse composite neonatal outcome (P<0.001) were also observed in the previa group as compared with controls. After controlling for potential confounding bias using multivariable logistic regression models, placenta previa remained statistically significantly associated with placental maternal (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-4.9, P=0.009) and fetal (aOR 7.05, 95% CI 2.4-20.2, P<0.001) vascular supply lesions, SGA (aOR 10, 95% CI 2.3-44.2, P=0.002) and adverse neonatal outcome (aOR 6.87, 95% CI 2.9-11.8, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: More placental vascular supply lesions, higher rate of SGA and worse neonatal outcome characterized pregnancies with placenta previa in the current study. These findings may suggest that abnormal placentation is accompanied by suboptimal implantation that interferes with fetal growth.
Authors: Eran Weiner; Jacob Bar; Nataly Fainstein; Letizia Schreiber; Avi Ben-Haroush; Michal Kovo Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Catherine Y Spong; Brian M Mercer; Mary D'Alton; Sarah Kilpatrick; Sean Blackwell; George Saade Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 7.623
Authors: E Jauniaux; I Dimitrova; N Kenyon; M Mhallem; N A Kametas; N Zosmer; C Hubinont; K H Nicolaides; S L Collins Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Elisa T Zhang; Roberta L Hannibal; Keyla M Badillo Rivera; Janet H T Song; Kelly McGowan; Xiaowei Zhu; Gudrun Meinhardt; Martin Knöfler; Jürgen Pollheimer; Alexander E Urban; Ann K Folkins; Deirdre J Lyell; Julie C Baker Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Andrew M Heitzer; Jamie C Piercy; Brittany N Peters; Allyssa M Mattes; Judith M Klarr; Beau Batton; Noa Ofen; Sarah Raz Journal: J Abnorm Child Psychol Date: 2020-01