Geoffrey Cs Smith1, Philip S McCann2, Damian Clark2, Rouin Amirfeyz2. 1. Sydney Orthopaedic and Arthritis Specialists, Sydney Orthopaedic Arthritis and Sports Medicine, Chatswood, NSW, Australia. 2. Hand Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Various surgical strategies have been described for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome, including medial epicondylectomy. This aims to decompress the ulnar nerve and allow a 'mini anterior transposition'. The major concern over medial epicondylectomy is the potential for postoperative iatrogenic valgus instability. METHODS: We utilized a surgical landmark for medial epicondylectomy based on the medial aspect of the ulnar nerve with the elbow in 90° of flexion in 12 cadaveric upper limbs. The size of the resultant fragment was measured and, subsequently, the medial collateral ligament was dissected and the elbow stressed to assess its integrity. RESULTS: This technique resulted in the excision of a fragment of mean width 8 mm (range 6 mm to 11 mm) and allowed the ulnar nerve to smoothly translate anteriorly in flexion. The anterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament was macroscopically preserved in all cases and there was no valgus instability. CONCLUSIONS: The medial border of the ulnar nerve is a simple, safe and reliable surgical landmark for medial epicondylectomy. This technique offers advantages over other described methods of assessing the location at which to perform a medial epicondylectomy.
BACKGROUND: Various surgical strategies have been described for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome, including medial epicondylectomy. This aims to decompress the ulnar nerve and allow a 'mini anterior transposition'. The major concern over medial epicondylectomy is the potential for postoperative iatrogenic valgus instability. METHODS: We utilized a surgical landmark for medial epicondylectomy based on the medial aspect of the ulnar nerve with the elbow in 90° of flexion in 12 cadaveric upper limbs. The size of the resultant fragment was measured and, subsequently, the medial collateral ligament was dissected and the elbow stressed to assess its integrity. RESULTS: This technique resulted in the excision of a fragment of mean width 8 mm (range 6 mm to 11 mm) and allowed the ulnar nerve to smoothly translate anteriorly in flexion. The anterior band of the ulnar collateral ligament was macroscopically preserved in all cases and there was no valgus instability. CONCLUSIONS: The medial border of the ulnar nerve is a simple, safe and reliable surgical landmark for medial epicondylectomy. This technique offers advantages over other described methods of assessing the location at which to perform a medial epicondylectomy.
Authors: Dimitrios G Efstathopoulos; George S Themistocleous; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; George D Chloros; Nikolaos E Gerostathopoulos; Panayotis N Soucacos Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.176