Literature DB >> 27582867

Association between World Health Organization categories of body mass index and relative risks for weight-related pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Katrina Zaballa1, Anthony Liu1, Michael John Peek2, Max Mongelli2, Ralph Nanan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the dose-dependent effect of body mass index (BMI) categories for common pregnancy outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all deliveries that occurred between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2009 in a tertiary maternity centre, in Sydney Australia. Common pregnancy outcomes were analysed against World Health Organization (WHO) BMI categories using multiple logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: From a total of 18,304 pregnancies, 9087 singleton pregnancies with complete data-sets were identified. Of these pregnancies, 4000 (44%) had a normal BMI, 470 (5.2%) were underweight, 2293 (25.2%) were overweight, 1316 (14.5%) were obese class I, 630 (6.9%) were obese class II and 378 (4.2%) were obese class III. Using the normal BMI category as the reference, there was a clear dose effect of BMI categories for hypertension (P < 0.001), pre-eclampsia (P < 0.001), caesarean section (P < 0.001), macrosomia (P < 0.001), large for gestational age (P < 0.001), small for gestational age (P < 0.001) and neonatal respiratory distress (P = 0.039). In contrast, despite a significant association with BMI (P < 0.001), a dose-dependent effect was not found for gestational diabetes.
CONCLUSION: The results of our study have important clinical significance as the data, using WHO BMI categories, more accurately help stratify risk assessment in a clinically relevant dose-dependent relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  World Health Organization; body mass index; pregnancy outcome

Year:  2012        PMID: 27582867      PMCID: PMC4989705          DOI: 10.1258/om.2012.110091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Med        ISSN: 1753-495X


  20 in total

1.  Overweight and obesity in pregnancy do not adversely affect neonatal outcomes: new evidence.

Authors:  H Narchi; A Skinner
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Smoking and smoking cessation during early pregnancy and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes and fetal growth.

Authors:  Constantine I Vardavas; Leda Chatzi; Evridiki Patelarou; Estel Plana; Katerina Sarri; Anthony Kafatos; Antonis D Koutis; Manolis Kogevinas
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London.

Authors:  N J Sebire; M Jolly; J P Harris; J Wadsworth; M Joffe; R W Beard; L Regan; S Robinson
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-08

4.  The influence of increasing BMI in nulliparous women on pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Aristidis Mantakas; Tom Farrell
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Effect of prepregnancy body mass index categories on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Haim A Abenhaim; Robert A Kinch; Lucie Morin; Alice Benjamin; Robert Usher
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 6.  Maternal obesity and risk of stillbirth: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Susan Y Chu; Shin Y Kim; Joseph Lau; Christopher H Schmid; Patricia M Dietz; William M Callaghan; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese.

Authors:  Chaturica Athukorala; Alice R Rumbold; Kristyn J Willson; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  The effects of maternal body mass index on pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  A S Khashan; L C Kenny
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 9.  Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Ayaba Worjoloh; Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Impact of maternal body mass index on neonatal outcome.

Authors:  P Kalk; F Guthmann; K Krause; K Relle; M Godes; G Gossing; H Halle; R Wauer; B Hocher
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.175

View more
  5 in total

1.  Anthropometric and ultrasound measures of maternal adiposity in the first trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Narelle Kennedy; Ann Quinton; Michael John Peek; Valeria Lanzarone; Ron Benzie; Ralph Nanan
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-04-28

2.  A novel evaluation of density differences in subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue layers in pregnancy using elastography.

Authors:  Narelle Kennedy; Ann Quinton; Michael John Peek; Kristy Robledo; Ron Benzie; Ralph Nanan
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-06-25

3.  Addressing preconception behaviour change through mobile phone apps: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Loretta M Musgrave; Caroline S E Homer; Nathalie V Kizirian; Adrienne Gordon
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-04

4.  The impact of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes in women and their children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yvon E G Timmermans; Kim D G van de Kant; Elise O Oosterman; Marc E A Spaanderman; Eduardo Villamor-Martinez; Jos Kleijnen; Anita C E Vreugdenhil
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Relationship between Maternal Central Obesity and the Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Da Yao; Qing Chang; Qi-Jun Wu; Shan-Yan Gao; Huan Zhao; Ya-Shu Liu; Yu-Ting Jiang; Yu-Hong Zhao
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.011

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.