| Literature DB >> 27582806 |
Katherine O'Brien1, Dimitrios Siassakos2, Janet Birchall3, Mark Gompels1, Sarah Allford4, Ken Bidgood4.
Abstract
Approximately one in six women are blood group RhD negative and are offered anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis to prevent sensitization and decrease the risk of haemolytic disease of the newborn in subsequent pregnancies. It has been thought that anti-D is harmless, but there is a risk of anaphylaxis. We describe a case of a woman with a possible immunological reaction to anti-D in her first pregnancy. A multidisciplinary team managed her second pregnancy, offering her evidence-based advice, where available, so that she could reach an informed decision regarding administration of anti-D or not. Women value individual tailored information rather than a 'one-size-fits-all' approach.Entities:
Keywords: anaphylaxis; anti-D; pregnancy
Year: 2009 PMID: 27582806 PMCID: PMC4989781 DOI: 10.1258/om.2008.080039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Med ISSN: 1753-495X