Literature DB >> 27582806

Reaction to anti-D immunoglobulin - can we manage it?

Katherine O'Brien1, Dimitrios Siassakos2, Janet Birchall3, Mark Gompels1, Sarah Allford4, Ken Bidgood4.   

Abstract

Approximately one in six women are blood group RhD negative and are offered anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis to prevent sensitization and decrease the risk of haemolytic disease of the newborn in subsequent pregnancies. It has been thought that anti-D is harmless, but there is a risk of anaphylaxis. We describe a case of a woman with a possible immunological reaction to anti-D in her first pregnancy. A multidisciplinary team managed her second pregnancy, offering her evidence-based advice, where available, so that she could reach an informed decision regarding administration of anti-D or not. Women value individual tailored information rather than a 'one-size-fits-all' approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anaphylaxis; anti-D; pregnancy

Year:  2009        PMID: 27582806      PMCID: PMC4989781          DOI: 10.1258/om.2008.080039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Med        ISSN: 1753-495X


  4 in total

Review 1.  Oliver memorial lecture. Towards the conquest of Rh haemolytic disease: Britain's contribution and the role of serendipity.

Authors:  L A Tovey
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.019

2.  Serum sickness due to Rh(anti-D) immunoglobulin.

Authors:  B F Jones; P R Trevillian; R S Nanra
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.100

3.  The incidence of large fetomaternal hemorrhage and the Kleihauer-Betke test.

Authors:  Raed Salim; Izhar Ben-Shlomo; Zohar Nachum; Rivka Mader; Eliezer Shalev
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Patient empowerment through education.

Authors:  F Brown
Journal:  Prof Nurse       Date:  1997-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.