| Literature DB >> 27582750 |
Hongxiao Zhang1, Yan Xia2, Chen Chen2, Kai Zhuang2, Yufeng Song2, Zhenguo Shen2.
Abstract
Copper (Cu) is an essential micronutrient for plants, but excess Cu can inactivate and disturb the protein function due to unavoidable binding to proteins at the cellular level. As a redox-active metal, Cu toxicity is mediated by the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Cu-binding structural motifs may alleviate Cu-induced damage by decreasing free Cu(2+) activity in cytoplasm or scavenging ROS. The identification of Cu-binding proteins involved in the response of plants to Cu or ROS toxicity may increase our understanding the mechanisms of metal toxicity and tolerance in plants. This study investigated change of Cu-binding proteins in radicles of germinating rice seeds under excess Cu and oxidative stress using immobilized Cu(2+) affinity chromatography, two-dimensional electrophoresis, and mass spectra analysis. Quantitative image analysis revealed that 26 protein spots showed more than a 1.5-fold difference in abundances under Cu or H2O2 treatment compared to the control. The identified Cu-binding proteins were involved in anti-oxidative defense, stress response and detoxification, protein synthesis, protein modification, and metabolism regulation. The present results revealed that 17 out of 24 identified Cu-binding proteins have a similar response to low concentration Cu (20 μM Cu) and H2O2 stress, and 5 out of 24 were increased under low and high concentration Cu (100 μM Cu) but unaffected under H2O2 stress, which hint Cu ions can regulate Cu-binding proteins accumulation by H2O2 or no H2O2 pathway to cope with excess Cu in cell. The change pattern of these Cu-binding proteins and their function analysis warrant to further study the roles of Cu ions in these Cu-binding proteins of plant cells.Entities:
Keywords: Cu stress; Cu-binding protein; H2O2 stress; germinating rice seed; immobilized metal affinity chromatography
Year: 2016 PMID: 27582750 PMCID: PMC4987373 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Cu-induced changes in H Histochemical detection of H2O2 in rice radicles under different treatments. (B) Histochemical detection of H2O2 in rice radicles under varied Cu treatment times. (C) The concentration of H2O2 in rice radicles under different Cu treatments. Germinating rice seeds were treated with CuSO4 (0, 20, 100, and 200 μM) solution and 1 mM ascorbic acid (Asc) solution for 12 h, or treated with 100 μM CuSO4 solution for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Subsequently radicles from Cu-treated plants were incubated in 1 mg/mL solution of 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB, pH 3.8) for 20 min, or were homogenized and the H2O2 content assayed by spectrophotometry. Bar, 1 mm.
Figure 2Representative 2-DE maps of copper-binding proteins obtained from radicles of germinating rice seeds treated with Cu and H. Germinating rice seeds were treated with control (deionized water without Cu and H2O2), 10 mM H2O2 for 6 h, 20 and 100 μM Cu for 12 h. A 20 mg proteins extracts from radicles of germinating rice seeds was loaded onto the column with IDA-sepharose to removal metal ions in protein samples before onto Cu-IMAC. These Cu-binding proteins eluted from a Cu-IMAC column were subjected to 2-DE separation. One-hundred microgram of total protein were loaded onto IPG dry strips (17 cm, pH 4–7 linear gradient), the second dimension was carried out using 12% SDS-PAGE. The protein spots were visualized by mass spectrometry compatible silver staining.
Figure 3Enlargements of the framed areas (A), (B), (C), and (D) shown in Figure . Arrows indicate the differentially expressed proteins in response to Cu and H2O2 stress. The vertical axis (abundance) mean a summation of the pixel intensities localized within the defined spot area, which obtained by PDQuest (Bio-Rad) image analysis software.
Differentially accumulated Cu-binding proteins of rice radicles identified by MS/MS.
| 6 | Glutathione S-transferase 2 | – | 5.1↑ | 4.1↑ | 24.7/5.50 | 24.3/5.77 | 3(2) | 14 | 106 | |
| 8 | L-ascorbate peroxidase | 3.0↓ | 3.8↓ | 1.6↓ | 24.9/5.72 | 27.2/5.31 | 2(1) | 11 | 66 | |
| 13 | Putative quinone- oxidoreductase QR2 | 3.0↑ | 2.3↑ | 1.7↑ | 23.0/6.27 | 21.6/6.08 | 2(2) | 15 | 120 | |
| 14 | Glutathione S-transferase GSTF2 | 2.9↓ | – | 4.5↑ | 26.1/6.28 | 24.3/5.77 | 5(4) | 27 | 307 | |
| 15 | Peroxiredoxin | 4.5↑ | 8.3↑ | 23.3↑ | 23.8/6.51 | 24.2/5.97 | 7(5) | 35 | 309 | |
| 16 | Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase | 5.3↑ | 2.3↑ | ↓ | 17.7/6.27 | 15.3/5.71 | 2(2) | 15 | 175 | |
| 1 | Pathogenesis-related protein PR-10a | 5.9↓ | – | 3.7↑ | 14.2/4.81 | 16.9/4.95 | 4(4) | 34 | 235 | |
| 2 | Pathogenesis-related protein Bet v I family protein | 2.2↓ | 2.6↓ | – | 16.7/5.02 | 17.2/4.96 | 4(3) | 36 | 150 | |
| 17 | Cytochrome P450-like protein | 1.7↑ | 1.9↑ | 10.3↓ | 36.0/5.63 | 58.1/6.28 | 3(2) | 10 | 79 | |
| 23 | Salt stress-induced protein | 1.8↑ | 2.5↑ | 1.8↑ | 33.1/5.01 | 15.2/5.00 | 6(6) | 66 | 656 | |
| 3 | Susceptibility homeodomain transcription factor | 9.4↑ | 2.9↑ | – | 18.2/5.31 | 18.4/5.30 | 3(3) | 26 | 263 | |
| 9 | Putative eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 | 1.6↓ | 6.8↓ | 5.0↓ | 17.6/5.91 | 17.8/5.6 | 5(5) | 45 | 364 | |
| 10 | Putative eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 | 2.0↓ | 5.3↓ | 2.8↓ | 17.0/6.02 | 17.9/5.87 | 6(4) | 40 | 270 | |
| 11 | Translation initiation factor 5A | 1.3↓ | 6.8↓ | 3.9↓ | 16.8/6.18 | 17.7/5.77 | 6(6) | 35 | 479 | |
| 21 | Elongation factor 2 | 30.0↑ | 11.4↑ | 6.1↑ | 32.0/6.52 | 95.0/5.85 | 5(1) | 4 | 173 | |
| 25 | Protein disulfide isomerase | – | 5.8↑ | 8.6↑ | 62.2/4.89 | 57.0/4.95 | 8(5) | 16 | 355 | |
| 26 | Protein disulfide isomerase | – | 12.9↑ | 12.8↑ | 63.3/4.80 | 57.0/4.95 | 8(7) | 18 | 466 | |
| 18 | Putative legumin | 2.0↑ | 1.5↑ | ↓ | 35.9/5.80 | 38.5/5.81 | 5(3) | 15 | 233 | |
| 19 | Putative legumin | 2.2↑ | 1.3↑ | 1.3↑ | 36.7/6.08 | 38.5/5.81 | 6(5) | 15 | 345 | |
| 24 | Cathepsin B-like cysteine protease | – | 1.5↑ | 2.2↑ | 31.7/5.22 | 40.4/6.25 | 8(8) | 23 | 550 | |
| 7 | Triosephosphate isomerase | – | 2.0↑ | 2.6↑ | 25.1/5.58 | 27.8/6.60 | 3(1) | 14 | 81 | |
| 12 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | 7.0↓ | 4.7↓ | ↓ | 19.0/6.53 | 28.5/8.62 | 7(4) | 20 | 302 | |
| 20 | Putative NADPH-dependent mannose 6-phosphate reductase | 1.7↑ | 1.7↑ | 2.3↑ | 35.9/6.28 | 37.5/5.88 | 6(6) | 21 | 382 | |
| 22 | Cytidine/deoxycytidine deaminase-like | – | 1.5↑ | 2.2↑ | 32.9/5.20 | 32.2/5.13 | 6(4) | 22 | 295 | |
| 4 | Arginine decarboxylase 2 | 2.2↑ | 2.3↑ | 6.3↓ | 21.8/5.32 | 67.7/6.45 | 5(5) | 11 | 382 | |
| 5 | Chalcone-flavonone isomerase | 2.1↓ | 3.5↓ | 2.4↓ | 25.9/5.20 | 23.9/5.15 | 4(4) | 31 | 398 | |
Spot abundance is accumulated as the ratio of intensities of proteins between stress and control. Fold changes indicate a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between treated samples and control samples by Duncan's test; ↑, up-regulated; ↓, down-regulated (alone↓, disappearance of spot); –, no change. H.
PM, number of peptides matched.
SC, sequence coverage by MS/MS.
Potential Cu-binding motifs of identified proteins.
| 1 | Pathogenesis-related protein PR-10a | – | MX7H |
| 2 | Pathogenesis-related protein Bet v I family protein | MX7H | |
| 3 | Susceptibility homeodomain transcription factor | HX2H | MX7H |
| 4 | Arginine decarboxylase 2 | HH; HXH; HX3H; HX5H | HX5H; HX7H; HX12H; HX3C; MX7H |
| 5 | Chalcone-flavonone isomerase | HXH | – |
| 6 | Glutathione S-transferase 2 | – | HX4H; CX3C |
| 7 | Triosephosphate isomerase | HH; HXH; HX2H; HX3H; HX4H | HX4H |
| 8 | L-ascorbate peroxidase | HX5H | HX5H; MX7H |
| 9 | Putative eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 | HH; HXH; HX3H; HX5H | HX5H |
| 10 | Putative eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 | HH; HXH; HX3H; HX5H | HX5H |
| 11 | Translation initiation factor 5A | HH; HXH; HX3H; HX5H | HX5H |
| 12 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | HH; HX4H; HX5H; CX3C | HX5H |
| 13 | Putative quinone- oxidoreductase QR2 | HH | – |
| 14 | Glutathione S-transferase GSTF2 | HX4H; CX3C | |
| 15 | Peroxiredoxin | HX5H | HX5H; HX12H |
| 16 | Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase | HXH; HX2H; HX4H | HX7H |
| 17 | Cytochrome P450-like protein | HX2H; HX3H; HX4H | HX7H; HX6M |
| 18,19 | Putative legumin | – | – |
| 20 | Putative NADPH-dependent mannose 6-phosphate reductase | HXH; CX4C | – |
| 21 | Elongation factor 2 | CX4C | MX7H |
| 22 | Cytidine/deoxycytidine deaminase-like | HX5H | HX5H; HX7H; HX3C |
| 23 | Salt stress-induced protein | – | HX7H |
| 24 | Cathepsin B-like cysteine protease | CX2C; CX4C | HX7H; HX12H; HX3C |
| 25,26 | Protein disulfide isomerase | HX5H; CX2C | HX5H |
Motifs that were reported by Smith et al. (.
Motifs that were reported by Sookoian et al. (.
Figure 4Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analyses the gene expression of the identified proteins. The mRNA levels of CuZn-SOD (AAA33917), APX (AAP13093), Prx (AAQ01200), GST2 (ADM86864) were analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. The germinating seeds treated with 0, 20, and 100 μM Cu for 12 h or with 10 mM H2O2 for 6 h.
Figure 5A putative model of Cu-binding proteins in rice radicles to Cu and H. Red blocks show proteins accumulated only under Cu treatment; Blue blocks show proteins accumulated under treatment with low concentration Cu and H2O2 in the same way. The proteins with accumulation increase are marked by “↑” and those with decrease marked by “↓”.