Literature DB >> 27582628

Efficacy of safety catheter devices in the prevention of occupational needlestick injuries: applied research in the Liguria Region (Italy).

D Sossai1, M Di Guardo1, R Foscoli1, R Pezzi2, A Polimeni1, L Ruzza1, M Miele3, L Ottaggio3, V Fontana2, F Copello4, P Dellacà4, M Doria4, A Onesti4, G Montecucco4, F Risso4, M Nelli4, I Benvenuti4, M Santacroce4, L Giribaldi4, G Picelli4, S Simonini4, P Venturini4.   

Abstract

Healthcare workers who use or may be exposed to needles are at risk of needlestick injuries, which can lead to serious infections by bloodborne pathogens. These injuries can be avoided by eliminating the unnecessary use of needles and using safety devices. The present study was aimed at evaluating the impact of a safety-engineered device, with passive fully automatic needlestick protection, on the rate of needlestick injuries among healthcare workers. The setting of the study was a network of five public healthcare institutions situated in a Northern Italian Region. Data on the type of device, the number of employees and the number of catheter devices used per year were collected through regular meetings with healthcare workers over a period of five years. The most notable result of this study was the huge risk reduction associated with safety devices. Indeed, the risk of needlestick injuries due to conventional devices was found to be 25-fold higher than that observed for safety devices. However, it is noteworthy that a considerable part of this excess can be explained by the different background number of devices used. Moreover, descriptive analysis suggested that individuals with a poor/moderate training level had a lower risk than those with good/high training, though the difference was not statistically significant. In conclusion, there is convincing evidence of a causal connection between the introduction of safety devices and the reduction in needlestick injuries. This consideration should prompt the introduction of safety devices into daily clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare workers; Needlestick injuries; Safety catheter device

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27582628      PMCID: PMC4996039     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg        ISSN: 1121-2233


  16 in total

1.  Nursing2011 survey results: Blood exposure risk during peripheral I.V. catheter insertion and removal.

Authors:  Janine Jagger; Jane Perry; Ginger Parker; Elayne Kornblatt Phillips
Journal:  Nursing       Date:  2011-12

2.  Impact of safety needle devices on occupationally acquired needlestick injuries: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  D Adams; T S J Elliott
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Using an intravenous catheter system to prevent needlestick injury.

Authors:  Dimitri Sossai; Vincenzo Puro; Luca Chiappatoli; Giulio Dagnino; Bernardo Odone; Annamaria Polimeri; Laila Ruzza; Paola Palombo; Marian Stella Fuscoe; Paola Scognamiglio
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2010 Mar 24-30

Review 4.  European recommendations for the management of healthcare workers occupationally exposed to hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus.

Authors:  V Puro; G De Carli; S Cicalini; F Soldani; U Balslev; J Begovac; L Boaventura; M Campins Martí; M J Hernández Navarrete; R Kammerlander; C Larsen; F Lot; S Lunding; U Marcus; L Payne; A A Pereira; T Thomas; G Ippolito
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2005-10

5.  A prospective randomized trial of two safety peripheral intravenous catheters.

Authors:  Bertrand Prunet; Eric Meaudre; Ambroise Montcriol; Yves Asencio; Julien Bordes; Guillaume Lacroix; Eric Kaiser
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Needlestick injuries in a major teaching hospital: the worthwhile effect of hospital-wide replacement of conventional hollow-bore needles.

Authors:  Michael Whitby; Mary-Louise McLaws; Karen Slater
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.

Authors:  H Fukuda; N Yamanaka
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Factors associated with needlestick and sharp injuries among hospital nurses: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Eunhee Cho; Hyeonkyeong Lee; Miyoung Choi; Su Ho Park; Il Young Yoo; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.837

9.  Reduction of needlestick injuries in healthcare personnel at a university hospital using safety devices.

Authors:  Cornelia Hoffmann; Lutz Buchholz; Paul Schnitzler
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.646

Review 10.  The importance of implementing safe sharps practices in the laboratory setting in Europe.

Authors:  Gabriella De Carli; Dominique Abiteboul; Vincenzo Puro
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.

Authors:  Viraj K Reddy; Marie-Claude Lavoie; Jos H Verbeek; Manisha Pahwa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-14

2.  Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Ottino; Andrea Argentero; Pier Angelo Argentero; Giacomo Garzaro; Carla Maria Zotti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.