Literature DB >> 27582562

Effects of support diameter and compliance on common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) gait kinematics.

Jesse W Young1, Bethany M Stricklen2, Brad A Chadwell2.   

Abstract

Locomotion is precarious in an arboreal habitat, where supports can vary in both diameter and level of compliance. Several previous studies have evaluated the influence of substrate diameter on the locomotor performance of arboreal quadrupeds. The influence of substrate compliance, however, has been mostly unexamined. Here, we used a multifactorial experimental design to investigate how perturbations in both diameter and compliance affect the gait kinematics of marmosets (Callithrix jacchus; N=2) moving over simulated arboreal substrates. We used 3D-calibrated video to quantify marmoset locomotion over a horizontal trackway consisting of variably sized poles (5, 2.5 and 1.25 cm in diameter), analyzing a total of 120 strides. The central portion of the trackway was either immobile or mounted on compliant foam blocks, depending on condition. We found that narrowing diameter and increasing compliance were both associated with relatively longer substrate contact durations, though adjustments to diameter were often inconsistent relative to compliance-related adjustments. Marmosets also responded to narrowing diameter by reducing speed, flattening center of mass (CoM) movements and dampening support displacement on the compliant substrate. For the subset of strides on the compliant support, we found that speed, contact duration and CoM amplitude explained >60% of the variation in substrate displacement over a stride, suggesting a direct performance advantage to these kinematic adjustments. Overall, our results show that compliant substrates can exert a significant influence on gait kinematics. Substrate compliance, and not just support diameter, should be considered a critical environmental variable when evaluating locomotor performance in arboreal quadrupeds.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance; Branch stiffness; Fine branch niche; Locomotion; Stability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27582562     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.140939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  5 in total

1.  A platform for semiautomated voluntary training of common marmosets for behavioral neuroscience.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Walker; Friederice Pirschel; Nicholas Gidmark; Jason N MacLean; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Visual Neuroscience Methods for Marmosets: Efficient Receptive Field Mapping and Head-Free Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Patrick Jendritza; Frederike J Klein; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Pascal Fries
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-05-17

3.  Spectral Power in Marmoset Frontal Motor Cortex during Natural Locomotor Behavior.

Authors:  Banty Tia; Mitsuaki Takemi; Akito Kosugi; Elisa Castagnola; Davide Ricci; Junichi Ushiba; Luciano Fadiga; Atsushi Iriki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Oscillatory Activity in Mouse Lemur Primary Motor Cortex During Natural Locomotor Behavior.

Authors:  Banty Tia; Fabien Pifferi
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-18

5.  Learning to move in the real world.

Authors:  Karen E Adolph; Jesse W Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 63.714

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.