| Literature DB >> 27582368 |
Abstract
Approximately 50 % of hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and up to 80 % of patients with infarction-related cardiogenic shock have multivessel coronary artery disease. The optimal revascularization strategy in these patients has still not been defined. Following successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion, immediate PCI of all additional lesions or staged PCI, after invasive or non-invasive proof of ischemia or conservative therapy can be considered. Randomized studies have demonstrated a clinical benefit of immediate or staged multivessel PCI compared to a conservative approach. So far there are no randomized studies available comparing immediate versus staged PCI. The data regarding the optimal strategy in patients with cardiogenic shock show low concordance. The currently running CULPRIT shock study will help to define the optimal strategy in shock patients. This manuscript summarizes the current knowledge and data and provides recommendations for the clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Acute myocardial infarction; Cardiogenic shock; Multivessel disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27582368 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-016-4473-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Herz ISSN: 0340-9937 Impact factor: 1.443