Literature DB >> 27582356

Cultural differences in survey responding: Issues and insights in the study of response biases.

Markus Kemmelmeier1.   

Abstract

This paper introduces the special section "Cultural differences in questionnaire responding" and discusses central topics in the research on response biases in cross-cultural survey research. Based on current conceptions of acquiescent, extreme, and socially desirable responding, the author considers current data on the correlated nature of response biases and the conditions under which different response styles they emerge. Based on evidence relating different response styles to the cultural dimension of individualism-collectivism, the paper explores how research presented as part of this special section might help resolves some tensions in this literature. The paper concludes by arguing that response styles should not be treated merely as measurement error, but as cultural behaviors in themselves.
© 2016 International Union of Psychological Science.

Keywords:  Cross-cultural psychology; Individualism-Collectivism; Response styles; Social Desirability; Survey Research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27582356     DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychol        ISSN: 0020-7594


  8 in total

1.  Implicit and Explicit Attitudes of Employers Toward Hiring People Who Have Experienced Depression.

Authors:  Yvon Florence; Corbière Marc
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-22

2.  Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21).

Authors:  Nahathai Wongpakaran; Tinakon Wongpakaran; Zsuzsanna Kövi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-07

3.  Grit and successful aging in older adults.

Authors:  Emma Rhodes; Tania Giovannetti
Journal:  Aging Ment Health       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.514

4.  Cultural adaptation and harmonization of four Nordic translations of the revised Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP-R).

Authors:  Emma Olsson; Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson; Sigríður María Atladóttir; Anna Axelin; Marsha Campbell-Yeo; Mats Eriksson; Guðrún Kristjánsdóttir; Emilia Peltonen; Bonnie Stevens; Bente Vederhus; Randi Dovland Andersen
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.125

5.  Theory Content, Question-Behavior Effects, or Form of Delivery Effects for Intention to Become an Organ Donor? Two Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Frank Doyle; Karen Morgan; Mary Mathew; Princy Palatty; Prashanti Kamat; Sally Doherty; Jody Quigley; Josh Henderson; Ronan O'Carroll
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Socioeconomic Status and Individual Personal Responsibility Beliefs Towards Food Access.

Authors:  Robert A Coleman; Mark D Fulford
Journal:  Food Ethics       Date:  2021-10-25

7.  Graduating nurse students' interest in older people nursing-A cross-sectional survey in six European countries.

Authors:  Sanna Koskinen; Eimear Burke; Natalja Fatkulina; Pilar Fuster; Eliisa Löyttyniemi; Leena Salminen; Juliane Stubner; Hrund Scheving Thorsteinsson; Helena Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  Int J Older People Nurs       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.471

8.  Cognitive fusion and personality traits in the context of mindfulness: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarah Pux; Eric Hahn; Niklas Bergmann; Inge Hahne; Luca Pauly; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Gerdina H M Pijenborg; Kerem Böge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.