Literature DB >> 27582206

Stop ignoring misconduct.

Donald S Kornfeld1, Sandra L Titus2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27582206     DOI： 10.1038/537029a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey.

Authors:  Susan Eastwood; Pamela Derish; Evangeline Leash; Stephen Ordway
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.

Authors:  Donald S Kornfeld
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Mentoring and research misconduct: an analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases.

Authors:  David E Wright; Sandra L Titus; Jered B Cornelison
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Evaluating U.S. medical schools' efforts to educate faculty researchers on research integrity and research misconduct policies and procedures.

Authors:  Sandra Larsen Titus
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Preparing whistleblowers for reporting research misconduct.

Authors:  Arthur J Bonito; Sandra L Titus; Angela M Greene; Jacqueline Amoozegar; Celia Eicheldinger; David E Wright
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; R Grant Steen; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Xiaoqian Wang; Michael D Mumford; Ryan P Brown; Shane Connelly; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A survey on data reproducibility in cancer research provides insights into our limited ability to translate findings from the laboratory to the clinic.

Authors:  Aaron Mobley; Suzanne K Linder; Russell Braeuer; Lee M Ellis; Leonard Zwelling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Aceil Al-Khatib; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Misconduct: Don't let witch hunts taint investigations.

Authors:  Kenneth Pimple
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Conflicts of interest in scientific publishing.

Authors:  Ignacio Amigo; Alberto Pascual-García
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Signaling the trustworthiness of science should not be a substitute for direct action against research misconduct.

Authors:  Donald S Kornfeld; Sandra L Titus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reproducibility and Research Integrity.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Adil E Shamoo
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  MooSciTIC: Training of trainers in West African research and higher education.

Authors:  Ménonvè Atindehou; Kifouli Adéoti; Laura Estelle Yêyinou Loko; Thierry Beulé; Emmanuel Paradis; Gustave Djedatin; Christine Tranchant-Dubreuil; François Sabot; Latifou Lagnika; Estelle Jaligot
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Gwaihir: Jupyter Notebook graphical user interface for Bragg coherent diffraction imaging.

Authors:  David Simonne; Jérôme Carnis; Clément Atlan; Corentin Chatelier; Vincent Favre-Nicolin; Maxime Dupraz; Steven J Leake; Edoardo Zatterin; Andrea Resta; Alessandro Coati; Marie-Ingrid Richard
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.868
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.