Literature DB >> 27581395

Protein interactions with layers of TiO2 nanotube and nanopore arrays: Morphology and surface charge influence.

Mukta Kulkarni1, Anca Mazare2, Jung Park3, Ekaterina Gongadze4, Manuela Sonja Killian2, Slavko Kralj5, Klaus von der Mark6, Aleš Iglič4, Patrik Schmuki7.   

Abstract

In the present work we investigate the key factors involved in the interaction of small-sized charged proteins with TiO2 nanostructures, i.e. albumin (negatively charged), histone (positively charged). We examine anodic nanotubes with specific morphology (simultaneous control over diameter and length, e.g. diameter - 15, 50 or 100nm, length - 250nm up to 10μm) and nanopores. The nanostructures surface area has a direct influence on the amount of bound protein, nonetheless the protein physical properties as electric charge and size (in relation to nanotopography and biomaterial's electric charge) are crucial too. The highest quantity of adsorbed protein is registered for histone, for 100nm diameter nanotubes (10μm length) while higher values are registered for 15nm diameter nanotubes when normalizing protein adsorption to nanostructures' surface unit area (evaluated from dye desorption measurements) - consistent with theoretical considerations. The proteins presence on the nanostructures is evaluated by XPS and ToF-SIMS; additionally, we qualitatively assess their presence along the nanostructures length by ToF-SIMS depth profiles, with decreasing concentration towards the bottom. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Surface nanostructuring of titanium biomedical devices with TiO2 nanotubes was shown to significantly influence the adhesion, proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (and other cells too). A high level of control over the nanoscale topography and over the surface area of such 1D nanostructures enables a direct influence on protein adhesion. Herein, we investigate and show how the nanostructure morphology (nanotube diameter and length) influences the interactions with small-sized charged proteins, using as model proteins bovine serum albumin (negatively charged) and histone (positively charged). We show that the protein charge strongly influences their adhesion to the TiO2 nanostructures. Protein adhesion is quantified by ELISA measurements and determination of the nanostructures' total surface area. We use a quantitative surface charge model to describe charge interactions and obtain an increased magnitude of the surface charge density at the top edges of the nanotubes. In addition, we track the proteins presence on and inside the nanostructures. We believe that these aspects are crucial for applications where the incorporation of active molecules such as proteins, drugs, growth factors, etc., into nanotubes is desired.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albumin; Distribution of protein binding; ELISA; Histone; TiO(2) nanotube/nanopore

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27581395     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.08.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  13 in total

1.  Electrically polarized TiO2 nanotubes on Ti implants to enhance early-stage osseointegration.

Authors:  Amit Bandyopadhyay; Anish Shivaram; Indranath Mitra; Susmita Bose
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Porous Electrospun Fibers with Self-Sealing Functionality: An Enabling Strategy for Trapping Biomacromolecules.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Ting Zheng; Emine Alarçin; Batzaya Byambaa; Xiaofei Guan; Jianxun Ding; Yu Shrike Zhang; Zhongming Li
Journal:  Small       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 13.281

3.  Hydrothermally treated titanium surfaces for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of adipose derived stem cells.

Authors:  Vignesh K Manivasagam; Ketul C Popat
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2021-07-14

Review 4.  Antimicrobial and Osseointegration Properties of Nanostructured Titanium Orthopaedic Implants.

Authors:  Marcus Jäger; Herbert P Jennissen; Florian Dittrich; Alfons Fischer; Hedda Luise Köhling
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Ti-GO-Ag nanocomposite: the effect of content level on the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Jianfeng Jin; Li Zhang; Mengqi Shi; Yumei Zhang; Qintao Wang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-06-07

6.  Effects of hydrogenated TiO2 nanotube arrays on protein adsorption and compatibility with osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Ran Lu; Caiyun Wang; Xin Wang; Yuji Wang; Na Wang; Joshua Chou; Tao Li; Zhenting Zhang; Yunhan Ling; Su Chen
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-04-04

7.  Antibacterial and osteogenesis performances of LL37-loaded titania nanopores in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xinkun Shen; Mohammed A Al-Baadani; Hongli He; Lina Cai; Zuosu Wu; Litao Yao; Xinghai Wu; Shuyi Wu; Mengyu Chen; Hualin Zhang; Jinsong Liu
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-04-30

Review 8.  Surface Texture-Based Surface Treatments on Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloys for Tribological and Biological Applications: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Naiming Lin; Dali Li; Jiaojuan Zou; Ruizhen Xie; Zhihua Wang; Bin Tang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Electrochemical Evaluation of the Compact and Nanotubular Oxide Layer Destruction under Ex Vivo Ti6Al4V ELI Transpedicular Screw Implantation.

Authors:  Katarzyna Arkusz; Marta Nycz; And Ewa Paradowska
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Titanium and Protein Adsorption: An Overview of Mechanisms and Effects of Surface Features.

Authors:  Jacopo Barberi; Silvia Spriano
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.