Literature DB >> 27581217

The contemporary spectrum of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis: A multicenter study.

Andrew J Solomon1, Dennis N Bourdette2, Anne H Cross2, Angela Applebee2, Philip M Skidd2, Diantha B Howard2, Rebecca I Spain2, Michelle H Cameron2, Edward Kim2, Michele K Mass2, Vijayshree Yadav2, Ruth H Whitham2, Erin E Longbrake2, Robert T Naismith2, Gregory F Wu2, Becky J Parks2, Dean M Wingerchuk2, Brian L Rabin2, Michel Toledano2, W Oliver Tobin2, Orhun H Kantarci2, Jonathan L Carter2, B Mark Keegan2, Brian G Weinshenker2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).
METHODS: Neurologists at 4 academic MS centers submitted data on patients determined to have been misdiagnosed with MS.
RESULTS: Of 110 misdiagnosed patients, 51 (46%) were classified as "definite" and 59 (54%) "probable" misdiagnoses according to study definitions. Alternate diagnoses included migraine alone or in combination with other diagnoses 24 (22%), fibromyalgia 16 (15%), nonspecific or nonlocalizing neurologic symptoms with abnormal MRI 13 (12%), conversion or psychogenic disorders 12 (11%), and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder 7 (6%). Duration of misdiagnosis was 10 years or longer in 36 (33%) and an earlier opportunity to make a correct diagnosis was identified for 79 patients (72%). Seventy-seven (70%) received disease-modifying therapy and 34 (31%) experienced unnecessary morbidity because of misdiagnosis. Four (4%) participated in a research study of an MS therapy. Leading factors contributing to misdiagnosis were consideration of symptoms atypical for demyelinating disease, lack of corroborative objective evidence of a CNS lesion as satisfying criteria for MS attacks, and overreliance on MRI abnormalities in patients with nonspecific neurologic symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Misdiagnosis of MS leads to unnecessary and potentially harmful risks to patients. Misinterpretation and misapplication of MS clinical and radiographic diagnostic criteria are important contemporary contributors to misdiagnosis.
© 2016 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27581217      PMCID: PMC5047038          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  25 in total

1.  Problems with diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C M Poser; V V Brinar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-11-24       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Multiple sclerosis or multiple possibilities: the continuing problem of misdiagnosis.

Authors:  Richard A Rudick; Aaron E Miller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Disclosing a misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: do no harm?

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Eran Klein
Journal:  Continuum (Minneap Minn)       Date:  2013-08

4.  Diagnostic criteria in multiple sclerosis: headed in the right direction but still a ways to go.

Authors:  Richard A Rudick
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  A clinico-pathoanatomical study of multiple sclerosis diagnosis.

Authors:  T Engell
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.209

6.  Characteristics of patients found not to have multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  T J Murray; S J Murray
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Penny Whiting; Roger Harbord; Caroline Main; Jonathan J Deeks; Graziella Filippini; Matthias Egger; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-24

Review 8.  A Clinical Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Michel Toledano; Brian G Weinshenker; Andrew J Solomon
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.030

9.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.

Authors:  Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  55 in total

1.  Headache in the course of multiple sclerosis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marcel Gebhardt; Peter Kropp; Frank Hoffmann; Uwe K Zettl
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Dark Rims: Novel Sequence Enhances Diagnostic Specificity in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  J-M Tillema; S D Weigand; M Dayan; Y Shu; O H Kantarci; C F Lucchinetti; J D Port
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  [Neuroimmunology and rheumatology: overlap and differential diagnoses].

Authors:  C Trebst; T Kümpfel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.214

4.  Automated Integration of Multimodal MRI for the Probabilistic Detection of the Central Vein Sign in White Matter Lesions.

Authors:  J D Dworkin; P Sati; A Solomon; D L Pham; R Watts; M L Martin; D Ontaneda; M K Schindler; D S Reich; R T Shinohara
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  [Milestone or missed opportunity? : Commentary on the revision of the McDonald criteria 2017].

Authors:  Katrin Pape; Frauke Zipp
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  The tension between early diagnosis and misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; John R Corboy
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 7.  MRI in the assessment and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an update on best practice.

Authors:  Ulrike W Kaunzner; Susan A Gauthier
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 8.  Misdiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: Impact of the 2017 McDonald criteria on clinical practice.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Robert T Naismith; Anne H Cross
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Amit Bar-Or; Fredrik Piehl; Paolo Preziosa; Alessandra Solari; Sandra Vukusic; Maria A Rocca
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Diagnostic performance of central vein sign for multiple sclerosis with a simplified three-lesion algorithm.

Authors:  Andrew J Solomon; Richard Watts; Daniel Ontaneda; Martina Absinta; Pascal Sati; Daniel S Reich
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.