Literature DB >> 27581168

The fundamental role of ecological feedback mechanisms for the adaptive management of seagrass ecosystems - a review.

Paul S Maxwell1, Johan S Eklöf2, Marieke M van Katwijk3, Katherine R O'Brien1, Maricela de la Torre-Castro4, Christoffer Boström5, Tjeerd J Bouma6, Dorte Krause-Jensen7,8, Richard K F Unsworth9, Brigitta I van Tussenbroek3,10, Tjisse van der Heide11.   

Abstract

Seagrass meadows are vital ecosystems in coastal zones worldwide, but are also under global threat. One of the major hurdles restricting the success of seagrass conservation and restoration is our limited understanding of ecological feedback mechanisms. In these ecosystems, multiple, self-reinforcing feedbacks can undermine conservation efforts by masking environmental impacts until the decline is precipitous, or alternatively they can inhibit seagrass recovery in spite of restoration efforts. However, no clear framework yet exists for identifying or dealing with feedbacks to improve the management of seagrass ecosystems. Here we review the causes and consequences of multiple feedbacks between seagrass and biotic and/or abiotic processes. We demonstrate how feedbacks have the potential to impose or reinforce regimes of either seagrass dominance or unvegetated substrate, and how the strength and importance of these feedbacks vary across environmental gradients. Although a myriad of feedbacks have now been identified, the co-occurrence and likely interaction among feedbacks has largely been overlooked to date due to difficulties in analysis and detection. Here we take a fundamental step forward by modelling the interactions among two distinct above- and belowground feedbacks to demonstrate that interacting feedbacks are likely to be important for ecosystem resilience. On this basis, we propose a five-step adaptive management plan to address feedback dynamics for effective conservation and restoration strategies. The management plan provides guidance to aid in the identification and prioritisation of likely feedbacks in different seagrass ecosystems.
© 2016 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  adaptive management; alternative stable states; conservation; ecosystem engineer; feedbacks; interacting feedbacks; restoration; seagrass; stress gradients

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27581168     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  29 in total

1.  Partitioning resilience of a marine foundation species into resistance and recovery trajectories.

Authors:  Fernando Tuya; Yolanda Fernández-Torquemada; Yoana Del Pilar-Ruso; Fernando Espino; Pablo Manent; Leticia Curbelo; Francisco Otero-Ferrer; Jose A de la Ossa; Laura Royo; Laura Antich; Inés Castejón; Julia Máñez-Crespo; Ángel Mateo-Ramírez; Gabriele Procaccini; Candela Marco-Méndez; Jorge Terrados; Fiona Tomas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Species richness accelerates marine ecosystem restoration in the Coral Triangle.

Authors:  Susan L Williams; Rohani Ambo-Rappe; Christine Sur; Jessica M Abbott; Steven R Limbong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bacterial Communities and Their Predicted Functions Explain the Sediment Nitrogen Changes Along with Submerged Macrophyte Restoration.

Authors:  Chuan Wang; Shuangyuan Liu; Yi Zhang; Biyun Liu; Feng He; Dong Xu; Qiaohong Zhou; Zhenbin Wu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Influence of different types of sessile epibionts on the community structure of mobile invertebrates in an eelgrass bed.

Authors:  Kyosuke Momota; Masahiro Nakaoka
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Meta-Analysis of Reciprocal Linkages between Temperate Seagrasses and Waterfowl with Implications for Conservation.

Authors:  Nicole M Kollars; Amy K Henry; Matthew A Whalen; Katharyn E Boyer; Mathieu Cusson; Johan S Eklöf; Clara M Hereu; Pablo Jorgensen; Stephanie L Kiriakopolos; Pamela L Reynolds; Fiona Tomas; Mo S Turner; Jennifer L Ruesink
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Invasive Macrophytes Control the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen in a Shallow Lake: A Proposed Feedback Mechanism of Macrophyte Loss.

Authors:  Maria P Vilas; Clelia L Marti; Matthew P Adams; Carolyn E Oldham; Matthew R Hipsey
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Rocking the Boat: Damage to Eelgrass by Swinging Boat Moorings.

Authors:  Richard K F Unsworth; Beth Williams; Benjamin L Jones; Leanne C Cullen-Unsworth
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Eelgrass Leaf Surface Microbiomes Are Locally Variable and Highly Correlated with Epibiotic Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Mia M Bengtsson; Anton Bühler; Anne Brauer; Sven Dahlke; Hendrik Schubert; Irmgard Blindow
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Tolerance of Ruppia sinensis Seeds to Desiccation, Low Temperature, and High Salinity With Special Reference to Long-Term Seed Storage.

Authors:  Ruiting Gu; Yi Zhou; Xiaoyue Song; Shaochun Xu; Xiaomei Zhang; Haiying Lin; Shuai Xu; Shidong Yue; Shuyu Zhu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Relationships between aquatic vegetation and water turbidity: A field survey across seasons and spatial scales.

Authors:  Åsa N Austin; Joakim P Hansen; Serena Donadi; Johan S Eklöf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.