| Literature DB >> 27581051 |
Helena I Gomes1, Ashley Jones2, Mike Rogerson3, Ian T Burke4, William M Mayes2.
Abstract
Bauxite residue is an important by-product of the alumina industry, and current management practices do not allow their full valorisation, especially with regard to the recovery of critical metals. This work aims to test the efficiency of ion exchange resins for vanadium (V) removal and recovery from bauxite residue leachates at alkaline pH (11.5 and 13). As an environmental pollutant, removal of V from leachates may be an obligation of bauxite residue disposal areas (BRDA) long-term management requirements. Vanadium removal from the leachate can be coupled with the recovery, and potentially can be used to offset long-term legacy treatment costs in legacy sites. Kinetics studies were performed to understand the adsorption process. The rate kinetics for the V adsorption was consistent with the pseudo-first-order kinetic model, with a higher adsorption rate for pH 11.5 (1.2 min-1). Adsorption isotherm data fitted better to Freundlich equations than to the Langmuir model. The maximum adsorption capacity (Langmuir value q max) was greatest for pH 13 (9.8 mg V g-1 resin). In column tests, breakthrough was reached at 70 bed volumes with the red mud leachate at pH 13, while no breakthrough was achieved with the effluent at pH 11.5. In regeneration, 42 and 76 % of V were eluted from the resin with 2 M NaOH from the red mud leachate at pH 13 and 11.5, respectively. Further optimization will be needed to upscale the treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Alkaline drainage; Anion exchange resin; Metal recovery; Recycling; Red mud; Sorption
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27581051 PMCID: PMC5101287 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7514-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Average composition of the operating and post-closure synthetic bauxite residue leachate and comparison with the concentrations of major and selected trace elements found in Ajka (mg L−1), Hungary (Mayes et al. 2011)
| Synthetic operating BRDA leachate ( | Synthetic post-closure BRDA effluent ( | K1 sample, Ajka (01/12/2010) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 13.1 ± 0.1 | 11.5 ± 0.1 | 13.06 |
| mg L−1 | |||
| Ca | 1.02 ± 0.43 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 1.3 |
| Mg | <0.04 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.001 |
| K | 10.3 ± 6.4 | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 85 |
| Na | >1000 | 186.0 ± 139.0 | 701 |
| Al | 69 ± 14 | 2.0 ± 1.2 | 659 |
| Si | 2.4 ± 3.9 | 5.3 ± 4.6 | 0.7 |
| P | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.02 | – |
| S | 19.9 ± 15.8 | 1.5 ± 1.1 | – |
| As | 1.08 ± 0.41 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 3.6 |
| Ga | 0.1 ± 0.05 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 2.3 |
| Mo | 0.3 ± 0.2 | <0.007 | 4.1 |
| V | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 5.7 |
| W | 0.2 ± 0.04 | <0.007 | 0.5 |
Characteristics of Amberlite® IRA-400 (Mustafa et al. 2010)
| Properties | |
|---|---|
| Polymer matrix | Polystyrene divinylbenzene copolymer |
| Functional group | –N+R3 (quaternary ammonium) |
| Physical form | Pale yellow translucent beads |
| Particle size | 600–750 μm |
| Ionic form | Cl− |
| Exchange capacity | 2.6–3 eq kg −1 (dry mass) |
| Effective size | 0.3–0.9 mm |
| Operating temperature | 80 °C (maximum) |
| pH range | 0–14 |
Experimental parameters of the column experiments
| Parameters | Test 1 | Test 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Feed solution | Operating BRDA leachate | Post-closure BRDA effluent |
| Feed grade target ion—vanadium (mg L−1) | 3 | 5 |
| Flow rate (mL min−1) | 6 | 6 |
| Flow direction | Downstream | Downstream |
| Resin volume (mL) | 5 | 5 |
| Bed volume—BV (L) | 0.051 | 0.051 |
| Bed depth (cm) | 2 | 2 |
| Flow rate (BV h−1) | 72 | 72 |
| Flow velocity (cm−1 s−1) | 0.033 | 0.033 |
| Duration (h) | 5 | 5 |
Fig. 1Removal of vanadium in the ion exchange resin in time with operating and post-closure bauxite residue leachate (pH 13 and 11.5) and the pseudo-first-order kinetics curves (Lagergren)
Pseudo-first-order rate constants and coefficient of determination (r 2) for V removal
| Feed solution | Initial pH | Final pH | Initial [V] (mg L−1) | Pseudo-first-order kinetics (Lagergren) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Post-closure effluent | 11.5 | 11.6 | 5.3 | 1.181 | 0.997 |
| Operating BRDA leachate | 13.3 | 13.2 | 4.7 | 0.545 | 0.985 |
Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm constants and coefficient of determination (R 2) for adsorption of V in the bauxite residue leachates
| pH | Langmuir isotherm | Freundlich isotherm | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Post-closure effluent | 11.5 | 1.135 | 3.218 | 0.859 | 0.547 | 2.383 | 0.999 |
| Operating BRDA leachate | 13.3 | 9.759 | 0.060 | 0.919 | 0.285 | 1.050 | 0.993 |
Fig. 2Isotherm curves and experimental data for the operating BDRA neat residue leachate (pH 13) and the post-closure effluent and runoff (pH 11.5)
Fig. 3Removal percentages of other elements in the batch tests with a operating BDRA neat residue leachate (pH 13) and b post-closure effluent and runoff (pH 11.5)
Fig. 4Breakthrough of vanadium with the operating BRDA neat residue leachate (test 1) and the post-closure effluent (test 2)
Fig. 5Elution curves of V from the column with 2.0 M NaOH in test 1 and test 2, with pH 13 and 11.5, respectively
Fig. 6Elution curves of competing elements from the column with 2.0 M NaOH in a test 1 with operating BDRA neat residue leachate (pH 13) and b test 2 with post-closure effluent (pH 11.5)
Dominant ionic species, concentrations (inside brackets, mg L−1) in the bauxite residue leachate at pH 11.5 and 13 modelled in PHREEQC using the MINTEQ database with the average concentrations (Table 1)
| Element | Operating BRDA neat residue leachate (pH 13) | Post-closure effluent and runoff (pH 11.5) |
|---|---|---|
| Total V = 4.6 mg L−1 | Total V = 5.3 mg L−1 | |
| V | HVO4 2− (7.3) | HVO4 2− (12.0) |
| VO4 3− (3.1) | VO4 3− (0.03) | |
| V2O7 4− (6.7) | H2VO4 − (0.01) | |
| As | AsO4 3− (2.0) | AsO4 3− (0.03) |
| HAsO4 2− (0.007) | HAsO4 2− (0.02) | |
| H2AsO4 − (1.7 × 10−9) | H2AsO4 − (4.8 × 10−7) | |
| P | CaPO4 − (0.7) | HPO4 2− (1.1) |
| PO4 3− (0.4) | CaPO4 − (1.2) | |
| HPO4 2− (0.02) | PO4 3− (0.2) | |
| S | SO4 2− (18.3) | SO4 2− (1.5) |
| NaSO4 − (1.9) | NaSO4 − (0.1) | |
| KSO4 − (0.02) | KSO4 − (8.9× 10−4) | |
| Si | H2SiO4 2− (2.3) | H3SiO4 − (7.9) |
| H3SiO4 − (1.5) | H2SiO4 2− (0.2) | |
| H4SiO4 (0.001) | H4SiO4 (0.2) | |
| Al | Al(OH)4 − (243.2) | Al(OH)4 − (7.0) |
| Al(OH)3 (9.7 × 10−6) | Al(OH)3 (1.3× 10−5) | |
| Al(OH)2 +(3.8 × 10−12) | Al(OH)2 + (1.8 × 10−10) |