Literature DB >> 27580760

Effect of correlation on covariate selection in linear and nonlinear mixed effect models.

Peter L Bonate1.   

Abstract

The effect of correlation among covariates on covariate selection was examined with linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. Demographic covariates were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III database. Concentration-time profiles were Monte Carlo simulated where only one covariate affected apparent oral clearance (CL/F). A series of univariate covariate population pharmacokinetic models was fit to the data and compared with the reduced model without covariate. The "best" covariate was identified using either the likelihood ratio test statistic or AIC. Weight and body surface area (calculated using Gehan and George equation, 1970) were highly correlated (r = 0.98). Body surface area was often selected as a better covariate than weight, sometimes as high as 1 in 5 times, when weight was the covariate used in the data generating mechanism. In a second simulation, parent drug concentration and three metabolites were simulated from a thorough QT study and used as covariates in a series of univariate linear mixed effects models of ddQTc interval prolongation. The covariate with the largest significant LRT statistic was deemed the "best" predictor. When the metabolite was formation-rate limited and only parent concentrations affected ddQTc intervals the metabolite was chosen as a better predictor as often as 1 in 5 times depending on the slope of the relationship between parent concentrations and ddQTc intervals. A correlated covariate can be chosen as being a better predictor than another covariate in a linear or nonlinear population analysis by sheer correlation These results explain why for the same drug different covariates may be identified in different analyses.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monte Carlo; collinearity; model development; population modeling; type I error

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27580760     DOI: 10.1002/pst.1776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Stat        ISSN: 1539-1604            Impact factor:   1.894


  2 in total

1.  Early fatigue in cancer patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: an insight from clinical practice.

Authors:  Alessio Cortellini; Maria G Vitale; Federica De Galitiis; Francesca R Di Pietro; Rossana Berardi; Mariangela Torniai; Michele De Tursi; Antonino Grassadonia; Pietro Di Marino; Daniele Santini; Tea Zeppola; Cecilia Anesi; Alain Gelibter; Mario Alberto Occhipinti; Andrea Botticelli; Paolo Marchetti; Francesca Rastelli; Federica Pergolesi; Marianna Tudini; Rosa Rita Silva; Domenico Mallardo; Vito Vanella; Corrado Ficorella; Giampiero Porzio; Paolo A Ascierto
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.531

2.  Comparison of covariate selection methods with correlated covariates: prior information versus data information, or a mixture of both?

Authors:  Estelle Chasseloup; Gunnar Yngman; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.745

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.