Literature DB >> 27580742

An Evaluation of the Middle East Research Training Initiative Tool in Assessing Effective Functioning of Research Ethics Committees.

Walter Jaoko1, Elizabeth Bukusi2, Arlene M Davis3.   

Abstract

The effective functioning of a research ethics committee (REC) can be evaluated using self-assessment tools. The Middle East Research Ethics Training Initiative (MERETI) tool can be used by one member, typically the Chair, to score an REC. The consistency of these scores across several members of an REC has never been evaluated. This study examined whether results would be consistent irrespective of who conducts the assessment. One REC's effective functioning was assessed by several members ( n = 13). The Chair's scores were compared with scores of other members in relation to their duration of REC membership, research ethics training, gender, and employer's institutional affiliation to the REC. The Chair's overall score was higher than the other members' scores by 11%. No significant differences in scores were obtained in relation to duration of REC membership ( p = .72), interval since last research ethics training ( p = .94), and gender ( p = .27). The MERETI tool is thus consistent irrespective of who performs the assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment tool; effective functioning; evaluation; performance; research ethics committee

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27580742      PMCID: PMC8014513          DOI: 10.1177/1556264616665952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  12 in total

1.  International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) adopts Consolidated Guideline on Good Clinical Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials on Medicinal Products for Human Use.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Dig Health Legis       Date:  1997

2.  A pilot seminar on ethical issues in clinical trials for cancer researchers in Vietnam.

Authors:  Richard R Love; Norman Fost
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec

3.  Looking into the institutional review board: observations from both sides of the table.

Authors:  Georgine S Burke
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Biomedical Research Ethics Committees in sub-Saharan Africa: a collective review of their structure, functioning, and outcomes.

Authors:  Blessing Silaigwana; Douglas Wassenaar
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Henry Silverman; Hany Sleem; Keymanthri Moodley; Nandini Kumar; Sudeshni Naidoo; Thilakavathi Subramanian; Rola Jaafar; Malini Moni
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Research ethics capacity building in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of NIH Fogarty-funded programs 2000–2012.

Authors:  Paul Ndebele; Douglas Wassenaar; Solomon Benatar; Theodore Fleischer; Mariana Kruger; Clement Adebamowo; Nancy Kass; Adnan A Hyder; Eric M Meslin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: what we know and what we still need to learn.

Authors:  Lura Abbott; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research.

Authors:  Leslie E Wolf; Mary Croughan; Bernard Lo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Improving protection for research subjects in France: analysis of regional ethics committees.

Authors:  I Fauriel; G Moutel; N Duchange; I Callies; I François; C Huriet; C Hervé
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.

Authors:  Carl H Coleman; Marie-Charlotte Bouësseau
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  3 in total

1.  Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.

Authors:  Mila Petrova; Stephen Barclay
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  Capacity Development of Research Ethics Administrators: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mutshidzi A Mulondo; Joyce M Tsoka-Gwegweni; Puleng LenkaBula; Perpetual Chikobvu
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers' experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Ying Wu; Min Yang; Yang Li; Kaveh Khoshnood; Esther Luo; Lun Li; Xiaomin Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.834

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.