Matthew S Davitz1, William E Wu1, Brian J Soher2, James S Babb1, Ivan I Kirov1, Jeffrey Huang1, Girish Fatterpekar1, Oded Gonen3. 1. Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. 3. Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: oded.gonen@med.nyu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the sensitivity of non-localized, whole-head 1H-MRS to an individual's serial changes in total-brain NAA, Glx, Cr and Cho concentrations - metabolite metrics often used as surrogate markers in neurological pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, four back-to-back (single imaging session) and three serial (successive sessions) non-localizing, ~3min 1H-MRS (TE/TR/TI=5/104/940ms) scans were performed on 18 healthy young volunteers: 9 women, 9 men: 29.9±7.6 [mean±standard deviation (SD)] years old. These were analyzed by calculating a within-subject coefficient of variation (CV=SD/mean) to assess intra- and inter-scan repeatability and prediction intervals. This study was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. All subjects gave institutional review board-approved written, informed consent. RESULTS: The intra-scan CVs for the NAA, Glx, Cr and Cho were: 3.9±1.8%, 7.3±4.6%, 4.0±3.4% and 2.5±1.6%, and the corresponding inter-scan (longitudinal) values were: 7.0±3.1%, 10.6±5.6%, 7.6±3.5% and 7.0±3.9%. This method is shown to have 80% power to detect changes of 14%, 27%, 26% and 19% between two serial measurements in a given individual. CONCLUSIONS: Subject to the assumption that in neurological disorders NAA, Glx, Cr and Cho changes represent brain-only pathology and not muscles, bone marrow, adipose tissue or epithelial cells, this approach enables us to quantify them, thereby adding specificity to the assessment of the total disease load. This will facilitate monitoring diffuse pathologies with faster measurement, more extensive (~90% of the brain) spatial coverage and sensitivity than localized 1H-MRS. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess the sensitivity of non-localized, whole-head 1H-MRS to an individual's serial changes in total-brain NAA, Glx, Cr and Cho concentrations - metabolite metrics often used as surrogate markers in neurological pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, four back-to-back (single imaging session) and three serial (successive sessions) non-localizing, ~3min 1H-MRS (TE/TR/TI=5/104/940ms) scans were performed on 18 healthy young volunteers: 9 women, 9 men: 29.9±7.6 [mean±standard deviation (SD)] years old. These were analyzed by calculating a within-subject coefficient of variation (CV=SD/mean) to assess intra- and inter-scan repeatability and prediction intervals. This study was Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. All subjects gave institutional review board-approved written, informed consent. RESULTS: The intra-scan CVs for the NAA, Glx, Cr and Cho were: 3.9±1.8%, 7.3±4.6%, 4.0±3.4% and 2.5±1.6%, and the corresponding inter-scan (longitudinal) values were: 7.0±3.1%, 10.6±5.6%, 7.6±3.5% and 7.0±3.9%. This method is shown to have 80% power to detect changes of 14%, 27%, 26% and 19% between two serial measurements in a given individual. CONCLUSIONS: Subject to the assumption that in neurological disordersNAA, Glx, Cr and Cho changes represent brain-only pathology and not muscles, bone marrow, adipose tissue or epithelial cells, this approach enables us to quantify them, thereby adding specificity to the assessment of the total disease load. This will facilitate monitoring diffuse pathologies with faster measurement, more extensive (~90% of the brain) spatial coverage and sensitivity than localized 1H-MRS. Copyright Â
Authors: Mona A Mohamed; Peter B Barker; Richard L Skolasky; Ola A Selnes; Richard T Moxley; Martin G Pomper; Ned C Sacktor Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Ned Sacktor; Richard L Skolasky; Thomas Ernst; Xiangling Mao; Ola Selnes; Martin G Pomper; Linda Chang; Kai Zhong; Dikoma C Shungu; Karen Marder; Dean Shibata; Giovanni Schifitto; Linda Bobo; Peter B Barker Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: E Goebell; J Fiehler; X-Q Ding; S Paustenbach; S Nietz; O Heese; T Kucinski; C Hagel; M Westphal; H Zeumer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Brian J Soher; William E Wu; Assaf Tal; Pippa Storey; Ke Zhang; James S Babb; Ivan I Kirov; Yvonne W Lui; Oded Gonen Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: E Tarasów; A Wiercińska-Drapało; B Kubas; W Dzienis; A Orzechowska-Bobkiewicz; D Prokopowicz; J Walecki Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 1.701
Authors: Ivan I Kirov; Ruben Kuzniecky; Hoby P Hetherington; Brian J Soher; Matthew S Davitz; James S Babb; Heath R Pardoe; Jullie W Pan; Oded Gonen Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Ivan I Kirov; William E Wu; Brian J Soher; Matthew S Davitz; Jeffrey H Huang; James S Babb; Mariana Lazar; Girish Fatterpekar; Oded Gonen Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 4.044