Literature DB >> 27580478

Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Decompression Adjacent to Instrumented Segments.

Peter Grunert1, Phillip M Reyes, Anna G U S Newcomb, Sara B Towne, Brian P Kelly, Nicholas Theodore, Roger Härtl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multilevel lumbar stenosis, in which 1 level requires stabilization due to spondylolisthesis, is routinely treated with multilevel open laminectomy and fusion. We hypothesized that a minimally invasive (MI) decompression is biomechanically superior to open laminectomy and may allow decompression of the level adjacent the spondylolisthesis without additional fusion.
OBJECTIVE: To study the mechanical effect of various decompression procedures adjacent to instrumented segments in cadaver lumbar spines.
METHODS: Conditions tested were (1) L4-L5 instrumentation, (2) L3-L4 MI decompression, (3) addition of partial facetectomy at L3-L4, and (4) addition of laminectomy at L3-L4. Flexibility tests were performed for range of motion (ROM) analysis by applying nonconstraining, pure moment loading during flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Compression flexion tests were performed for motion distribution analysis.
RESULTS: After instrumentation, MI decompression increased flexion-extension ROM at L3-L4 by 13% (P = .03) and axial rotation by 23% (P = .003). Partial facetectomy further increased axial rotation by 15% (P = .03). After laminectomy, flexion-extension ROM further increased by 12% (P = .05), a 38% increase from baseline, and axial rotation by 17% (P = .02), a 58% increase from baseline. MI decompression yielded no significant increase in segmental contribution of motion at L3-L4, in contrast to partial facetectomy and laminectomy (<.05).
CONCLUSION: MI tubular decompression is biomechanically superior to open laminectomy adjacent to instrumented segments. These results lend support to the concept that in patients in whom a multilevel MI decompression is performed, the fusion might be limited to the segments with actual instability. ABBREVIATION: MI, minimally invasive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27580478     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

Review 1.  "One and a half" minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with adjacent segment unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for spondylolisthesis with bisegmental stenosis.

Authors:  Christoph Wipplinger; Carolin Melcher; R Nick Hernandez; Sara Lener; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Sertac Kirnaz; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Eliana Kim; Roger Härtl
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Contralateral facet-sparing sublaminar endoscopic foraminotomy for the treatment of lumbar lateral recess stenosis: technical note.

Authors:  Guntram Krzok; Albert E Telfeian; Ralf Wagner; Christoph P Hofstetter; Menno Iprenburg
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

3.  Interlaminar endoscopic lateral recess decompression-surgical technique and early clinical results.

Authors:  Zeinab Birjandian; Samuel Emerson; Albert E Telfeian; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

4.  Co-contraction characteristics of lumbar muscles in patients with lumbar disc herniation during different types of movement.

Authors:  Wenjing Du; Huihui Li; Olatunji Mumini Omisore; Lei Wang; Wenmin Chen; Xiangjun Sun
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Tandem Microscopic Slalom Technique: The Use of 2 Microscopes Simultaneously Performing Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Multilevel Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Christoph Wipplinger; Eliana Kim; Sara Lener; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Sertac Kirnaz; R Nick Hernandez; Carolin Melcher; Michelle Paolicelli; Farah Maryam; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.