Literature DB >> 27580297

Decline in artificial urinary sphincter survival in modern practice-do we treat a different patient?

Fawzy Farag1,2, Maarten van der Doelen1, Jetske van Breda1, Kathleen D'Hauwers1, John Heesakkers1.   

Abstract

AIM: Over the past few years, we have been doing an increasing number of revisions for artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) at our center. The study aims to investigate reason for this change in our practice.
METHODS: Demographics and surgical outcomes of patients who received AUS in 2003-2014 at our center were retrospectively evaluated, and patients were contacted to check the current status of their AUS. The outcomes of the study were: percentage of revisions and explanation, survival, and the risk factors associated with these events.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (72 years (30-87)) underwent 214 procedures: 99 primary implants, 11 secondary implants, 84 revisions, and 20 explantations-median follow-up was 54 months (5-146). The 5-years and 10-years revision-free survival for AUS were 47% and 23%, respectively. The 5 and 10 years explantation-free survival were 77% and 72%, respectively. The median time to revision for AUS implanted in 2010-2014 was shorter than in AUS implanted in 2003-2009 (6 vs. 13.5 months, P = 0.08). The percentage of AUS that were preceded by urethral surgery for incontinence was significantly higher in AUS implanted in 2010-2014 than in those implanted in 2003-2009 (19% vs. 63%, P = 0.001). The percentage of patients with AUS who received radiotherapy in the past 5 years was higher than in 2003-2009 (53% vs. 30%, P = 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: In modern urological practice, more exposure to RT and previous surgeries for incontinence are associated with increased risk for revision with decline in AUS survival.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial urinary sphincter; complications; urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27580297     DOI: 10.1002/nau.23110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  1 in total

1.  REPLY BY THE AUTHORS: Re: Artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015.

Authors:  Augusto Cesar Soares Dos Santos; Luíza de Oliveira Rodrigues; Daniela Castelo Azevedo; Lélia Maria de Almeida Carvalho; Mariana Ribeiro Fernandes; Sandra de Oliveira Sapori Avelar; Maria Glória Cruvinel Horta; Silvana Márcia Bruschi Kelles
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.