Literature DB >> 27580264

Determination of genotoxic potential by comparison of structurally related azo dyes using DNA repair-deficient DT40 mutant panels.

Masato Ooka1, Koji Kobayashi1, Takuya Abe1, Kazuhiko Akiyama1, Masahiko Hada1, Shunichi Takeda2, Kouji Hirota3.   

Abstract

Azo dyes, including Sudan I, Orange II and Orange G, are industrial dyes that are assumed to have genotoxic potential. However, neither the type of DNA damage induced nor the structural features responsible for toxicity have been determined. We used a panel of DNA-repair-pathway-deficient mutants generated from chicken DT40 cells to evaluate the ability of these azo dyes to induce DNA damage and to identify the type of DNA damage induced. We compared the structurally related azo dyes Sudan I, Orange II and Orange G to identify the structural features responsible for genotoxicity. Compared with wild type cells, the double-strand break repair defective RAD54-/-/KU70-/- cells were significantly more sensitive to Sudan I, but not to Orange II or Orange G. The quantum-chemical calculations revealed that Sudan I, but not Orange II or Orange G, has a complete planar aromatic ring structure. These suggest that the planar feature of Sudan I is critical to the inducing of double-strand breaks. In summary, we used a DNA-repair mutant panel in combination with quantum-chemical calculations to provide a clue to the chemical structure responsible for genotoxicity.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; Genotoxicity; SAR; Structure-activity relationship; Sudan I

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27580264     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  4 in total

1.  Molecular Modeling Study of the Genotoxicity of the Sudan I and Sudan II Azo Dyes and Their Metabolites.

Authors:  Rachelle J Bienstock; Lalith Perera; Melissa A Pasquinelli
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.545

2.  Chromatin remodeler ALC1 prevents replication-fork collapse by slowing fork progression.

Authors:  Masato Ooka; Takuya Abe; Kosai Cho; Kaoru Koike; Shunichi Takeda; Kouji Hirota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  XRCC1 counteracts poly(ADP ribose)polymerase (PARP) poisons, olaparib and talazoparib, and a clinical alkylating agent, temozolomide, by promoting the removal of trapped PARP1 from broken DNA.

Authors:  Kouji Hirota; Masato Ooka; Naoto Shimizu; Kousei Yamada; Masataka Tsuda; Mahmoud Abdelghany Ibrahim; Shintaro Yamada; Hiroyuki Sasanuma; Mitsuko Masutani; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  Genes Cells       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Application of In Vitro Metabolism Activation in High-Throughput Screening.

Authors:  Masato Ooka; Caitlin Lynch; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.