Literature DB >> 27579939

Biosimilars: Opportunities to Promote Optimization Through Payer and Provider Collaboration.

Chronis H Manolis1, Kiran Rajasenan2, William Harwin3, Scott McClelland4, Maria Lopes5, Carolyn Farnum5.   

Abstract

A panel was convened that consisted of 1 medical director, 2 pharmacy directors, and 2 oncologists, who represented the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health Plan, an integrated delivery network, and Florida Blue, a progressive regional health plan. This panel met in order to share ideas, discuss challenges, and develop practical solutions to promote optimal utilization in order to encourage collaboration between payers and providers to help ensure the success of biosimilar entrants into the marketplace. Live meetings were conducted in Orlando, Florida, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and were followed by virtual meetings to solidify ideas and concepts for this supplement. It is important for biosimilar manufacturers to identify potential payer, provider, and patient obstacles in order to develop strategic and tactical plans to preemptively address these potential obstacles. Gathering payer and provider insights will shed light on various issues such as access and reimbursement. Biosimilar manufacturers must be proactive in the education of payers, providers, and patients to ensure access to biosimilars. A strong factor emphasized among this group was that the assumption surrounding biosimilar development and use is the potential for health care cost savings. According to the panel, payers and providers must carefully consider economic implications and potential cost-effectiveness in order to increase the acceptance or understanding of biosimilars in clinical practice. The group identified 3 major challenges surrounding biosimilar adoption: (1) provider confidence in biosimilar education and clinical value, (2) provider confidence in reimbursement for new biosimilars, and (3) creating shared payer and provider cost-savings. After identification of the 3 challenges, the group posed potential solutions to help with biosimilar adoption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27579939     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.9-a.s3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Spec Pharm


  6 in total

1.  Biosimilars in the USA: Will New Efforts to Spur Approvals and Access Spur Uptake and Cost Savings?

Authors:  Stanton R Mehr; Richard A Brook
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-02

Review 2.  The role of biosimilars in value-based oncology care.

Authors:  Kashyap B Patel; Luiz H Arantes; Wing Yu Tang; Selwyn Fung
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians.

Authors:  Jingyan Yang; Kelly Blinzler; Joshua Lankin; Sapna Vijayakumar; Martine C Maculaitis; Ahmed Shelbaya
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 4.  Practical Strategies for Advanced Practitioners Streamlining the Integration of Oncology Biosimilar Therapies Into Practice.

Authors:  Kelley D Mayden; John M Kelton; Joanne C Ryan; Ali McBride
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2022-06-21

5.  Policy Options for Infliximab Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Given Emerging Evidence for Switching.

Authors:  Don Husereau; Brian Feagan; Carl Selya-Hammer
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 6.  The Challenges of Switching Therapies in an Evolving Multiple Biosimilars Landscape: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Brian G Feagan; Mona Marabani; Jashin J Wu; Freddy Faccin; Claire Spronk; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.845

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.