| Literature DB >> 27579926 |
Bárbara Sgarbi Morgan Fernandes1, Ilka Afonso Reis2, Heloisa de Carvalho Torres3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effectiveness of the telephone intervention for promoting self-care related to physical activity and following a diet plan in users with diabetes, compared to conventional monitoring of users over a six-month period.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27579926 PMCID: PMC5016047 DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.0632.2719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ISSN: 0104-1169
Figure 2Graphical representation of the monitoring and/or intervention performed for the control and experimental groups. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2012
Figure 1Telephone interventions performed according to their goals. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2012
Figure 3Consort Diagram. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2012
Distribution of the sample at the initial moment (T0) of the study, regarding the sociodemographic and economic variables of users with diabetes. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2012
| Variable | Control group (n=106) | Experimental group (n=104) | P value | |
| Gender %* | 0.213 | |||
| Male | 38 (35.9) | 28 (26.9) | ||
| Female | 68 (64.1) | 76 (73.1) | ||
| Education %* | 0.010† | |||
| Illiterate | 6 (5.7) | 19 (18.3%) | ||
| Elementary (complete or not) | 75 (70.8) | 71 (68.2%) | ||
| High School (complete or not) | 20 (18.8) | 13 (12.5%) | ||
| Higher (complete or not) | 5 (4.7) | 1 (1.0%) | ||
| Work situation %* | 1.000 | |||
| Active | 21 (19.8) | 21 (20.2%) | ||
| Inactive | 85 (80.2) | 83 (79.8%) | ||
| Marital status %* | 0.592 | |||
| With partner | 65 (61.3) | 59 (56.7%) | ||
| Without partner | 41 (38.7) | 45 (43.3%) | ||
| Mean age, in years (SD)‡ | 62.9±10.3 | 62.9±10.2 | 1.000 | |
| Mean income in MW§ (SD)‡ | 1.8±1.8 | 1.8±1.4 | 1.000 | |
| Glycohemoglobin in % (SD)‡ | 8.12±2.18 | 8.02±2.07 | 0.734 | |
| BMI, in kg/m2 (SD)‡ | 28.43±5.01 | 29.11±5.59 | 0.355 | |
* Percent; †Fisher's exact test; ‡standard deviation; §minimum wage=R$ 622.00 (US$=304.90)
Means of ESM scores in the evaluations at T0, T3 and T6 and comparison of the effect on the mean score of self-care (T6-T0) in the Experimental and Control Groups. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil, 2012
| Self-care | Experimental group Mean±SD* | Control group Mean±SD† | 95% CI† for the effect T6-T0 |
| T0 | 3.52±0.71 | 3.55±0.76 | |
| T3 | 5.20±0.94 | 4.34±1.10 | |
| T6 | 5.53±0.80 | 4.10±1.18 | |
| Effect T6-T0 | 1.97±0.96 | 0.57±1.53 | 1.03; 1.78 |
*Standard deviation; †Confidence Interval