Ann Kutney-Lee1, Dawn Smith, Joshua Thorpe, Cindy Del Rosario, Said Ibrahim, Mary Ersek. 1. *University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing †Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia ‡Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System; University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh §Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined comprehensively racial/ethnic variations in quality of end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: Examine end-of-life care quality received by Veterans and their families, comparing racial/ethnic minorities to nonminorities. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of chart review and survey data. SUBJECTS: Nearly all deaths in 145 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers nationally (n=94,697) in addition to Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) data (n=51,859) from October 2009 to September 2014. MEASURES: Outcomes included 15 BFS items and 4 indicators of high-quality end-of-life care, including receipt of a palliative care consult, chaplain visit, bereavement contact, and death in hospice/palliative care unit. Veteran race/ethnicity was measured via chart review and defined as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, or other. RESULTS: In adjusted models, no differences were observed by race/ethnicity in receipt of a palliative care consult or death in a hospice unit. Although black Veterans were less likely than white Veterans to receive a chaplain visit, Hispanic Veterans were more likely than white Veterans to receive a chaplain visit and to receive a bereavement contact. Less favorable outcomes for racial/ethnic minorities were noted on several BFS items. In comparison with family members of white Veterans, families of minority Veterans were less likely to report excellent overall care, and this difference was largest for black Veterans (48% vs. 62%). CONCLUSIONS: Bereaved family members of minority Veterans generally rate the quality of end-of-life care less favorably than those of white Veterans. Family perceptions are critical to the evaluation of equity and quality of end-of-life care.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined comprehensively racial/ethnic variations in quality of end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: Examine end-of-life care quality received by Veterans and their families, comparing racial/ethnic minorities to nonminorities. RESEARCH DESIGN: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of chart review and survey data. SUBJECTS: Nearly all deaths in 145 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers nationally (n=94,697) in addition to Bereaved Family Survey (BFS) data (n=51,859) from October 2009 to September 2014. MEASURES: Outcomes included 15 BFS items and 4 indicators of high-quality end-of-life care, including receipt of a palliative care consult, chaplain visit, bereavement contact, and death in hospice/palliative care unit. Veteran race/ethnicity was measured via chart review and defined as non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, or other. RESULTS: In adjusted models, no differences were observed by race/ethnicity in receipt of a palliative care consult or death in a hospice unit. Although black Veterans were less likely than white Veterans to receive a chaplain visit, Hispanic Veterans were more likely than white Veterans to receive a chaplain visit and to receive a bereavement contact. Less favorable outcomes for racial/ethnic minorities were noted on several BFS items. In comparison with family members of white Veterans, families of minority Veterans were less likely to report excellent overall care, and this difference was largest for black Veterans (48% vs. 62%). CONCLUSIONS: Bereaved family members of minority Veterans generally rate the quality of end-of-life care less favorably than those of white Veterans. Family perceptions are critical to the evaluation of equity and quality of end-of-life care.
Authors: Claire A Richards; Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Mary Ersek; Melissa W Wachterman; Lynn F Reinke; Leslie L Taylor; Ann M O'Hare Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Lauren T Starr; Connie M Ulrich; Scott M Appel; Paul Junker; Nina R O'Connor; Salimah H Meghani Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Jackie Szarka; Lynne V McFarland; Elizabeth K Vig; Rebecca L Sudore; Susan Crowley; Lynn F Reinke; Ranak Trivedi; Janelle S Taylor Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Ann Kutney-Lee; Scarlett L Bellamy; Mary Ersek; Elina L Medvedeva; Dawn Smith; Joshua M Thorpe; J Margo Brooks Carthon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Joan G Carpenter; Winifred Josephine Scott; Jennifer Kononowech; Mary Beth Foglia; Leah M Haverhals; Robert Hogikyan; Ann Kolanowski; Zach Landis-Lewis; Cari Levy; Susan C Miller; V J Periyakoil; Ciaran S Phibbs; Lucinda Potter; Anne Sales; Mary Ersek Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Paul R Duberstein; Michael Chen; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Laura M Perry; Sule Yilmaz; Fahad Saeed; Supriya G Mohile; Sally A Norton Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-10-19 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Shelli L Feder; Janet Tate; Mary Ersek; Supriya Krishnan; Sarwat I Chaudhry; Lori A Bastian; Joshua Rolnick; Ann Kutney-Lee; Kathleen M Akgün Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 3.612