Literature DB >> 27579838

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Approach in Stapes Surgery: Are Operative Times and Learning Curve Important for Making the Choice?

Giannicola Iannella1, Giuseppe Magliulo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the surgical outcomes of endoscopic stapes surgery, comparing the results with a conventional stapes surgery under microscopic approach. Estimate the operation type of each surgical approach and show a learning curve of endoscopic stapes surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty patients who underwent endoscopic stapedotomy for otosclerosis and 20 patients who underwent microscopic stapedotomy for otosclerosis.
INTERVENTIONS: Endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operating time, preoperative and postoperative hearing, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and postoperative pain.
RESULTS: The group of patients who underwent endoscopic stapes surgery showed a mean operative time calculated to be 45.0 min. The group of patients treated by microscopic approach had an estimated mean value of 36.5 min. Statistical difference was evident (p value = 0.01). The average duration of endoscopic surgery varied as the surgeon gained experience. There were no statistical differences between the average surgical times for the endoscopic and microscopic approaches (p >0.05) in the last 4-month period of surgery. Through the endoscopic approach the percentage of ears with a postoperative air-bone gap ≤20 dB was 95%. No difference from the percentage of the microscopic group (90%) (p >0.05) was reported. No difference regarding the incidence of intraoperative findings and postoperative complications between endoscopic and microscopic approaches was found.
CONCLUSION: Audiological outcomes achieved by endoscopic surgery are similar to the results obtained through a microscopic approach. Longer initial operative times and a learning curve are the principal grounds that might discourage most ear-surgeons from commencing endoscopic stapes surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27579838     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  14 in total

1.  A modified method of local infiltration for endoscopic stapes surgery: how I do it.

Authors:  Arnulfo Cornejo-Suarez; Maria Estela Chavez-Delgado; Ramon Perez-Ramirez; Isaac Montoya-Hernandez; Jose Regino Montoya-Valdez; Carlos Silvino Rosales-Orozco; Luis Humberto Govea-Camacho
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Endoscopic transcanal versus conventional microscopic tympanoplasty in treatment of anterior tympanic membrane perforations.

Authors:  Secaattin Gülşen; Mehmet Arıcı
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Endoscopic stapes surgery outcomes and complication rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ricardo Bartel; Juan Jose Sanz; Ignacio Clemente; Gabriela Simonetti; Guillem Viscacillas; Laura Palomino; Isabel Asarta; Xavier Lao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Tympanomeatal flap creation in endoscopic stapedotomy: cautery vs. cold instrumentation.

Authors:  Emine Demir; Metin Çeliker; Gökçe Aydın Balaban; Engin Dursun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Does endoscopic stapedotomy increase hearing restoration rates comparing to microscopic? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tsetsos Nikolaos; Tsentemeidou Aikaterini; Daskalakis Dimitrios; Blioskas Sarantis; Goudakos John; Tzoi Eleana; Markou Konstantinos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Endoscopic transcanal management of incus long process defects: rebridging with bone cement versus incus interposition.

Authors:  Waleed Moneir; Mohammed Abdelbadie Salem; Ahmed Hemdan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Stapedotomy: Our Experience.

Authors:  Hanumant S Giri; Pooja D Nayak; Madhuri Ravindra Giri; Geeta Solanki
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-08-06

8.  Endoscopic stapedotomy: safety and audiological results in 150 patients.

Authors:  Luca Bianconi; Luca Gazzini; Elisa Laura; Stefano De Rossi; Alessandro Conti; Daniele Marchioni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Endoscopic stapedotomy: Merits and demerits.

Authors:  Waleed Moneir; Ahmed Musaad Abd El-Fattah; Eslam Mahmoud; Mohamed Elshaer
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-12-13

10.  Comparison of surgical and audiological outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic approach in stapes surgery.

Authors:  Secaattin Gulsen; Erkan Karatas
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.