Literature DB >> 27578813

Perceived future career prospects in general practice: quantitative results from questionnaire surveys of UK doctors.

Trevor W Lambert1, Fay Smith1, Michael J Goldacre1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are more studies of current job satisfaction among GPs than of their views about their future career prospects, although both are relevant to commitment to careers in general practice. AIM: To report on the views of GPs compared with clinicians in other specialties about their future career prospects. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Questionnaire surveys were sent to UK medical doctors who graduated in selected years between 1974 and 2008.
METHOD: Questionnaires were sent to the doctors at different times after graduation, ranging from 3 to 24 years.
RESULTS: Based on the latest survey of each graduation year of the 20 940 responders, 66.2% of GPs and 74.2% of hospital doctors were positive about their prospects and 9.7% and 8.3%, respectively, were negative. However, with increasing time since graduation and increasing levels of seniority, GPs became less positive about their prospects; by contrast, over time, surgeons became more positive. Three to 5 years after graduation, 86.3% of those training in general practice were positive about their prospects compared with 52.9% of surgical trainees: in surveys conducted 12-24 years after graduation, 60.2% of GPs and 76.6% of surgeons were positive about their prospects.
CONCLUSION: GPs held broadly positive views of their career prospects, as did other doctors. However, there was an increase in negativity with increasing time since graduation that was not seen in hospital doctors. Research into the causes of this negativity and policy measures to ameliorate it would contribute to the continued commitment of GPs and may help to reduce attrition. © British Journal of General Practice 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  career choice; general practice; job satisfaction; primary care; secondary care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27578813      PMCID: PMC5072923          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


INTRODUCTION

GP recruitment in the UK is in crisis.1 Greater patient demand, an ageing population profile, an increasing population coupled with the switching of the management of chronic conditions from secondary to primary care, and an ageing GP workforce, have led to an increased need for more doctors to train in general practice.2 However, many existing training posts have gone unfilled1 and the expansion of training schemes alone is unlikely to have the desired outcome. Other areas of concern include increasing numbers of females in their 30s leaving general practice,1 and high workload.3,4 In a survey of GPs conducted in 2015, 71% said that high workload negatively affected their personal commitment to general practice.3 Previous research among GPs has found that low job satisfaction is associated with higher levels of intentions to leave medicine.5 A study of American physicians found that those who were very dissatisfied with their jobs were twice as likely to retire early as those who were satisfied, and were over three times more likely to reduce their hours to <20 hours per week before retirement.6 Job satisfaction is higher in individuals who perceive their job to have better career prospects.7 The aim of this study was to report the views of GPs regarding their perceived career prospects and to compare GPs’ views with those of other medical practitioners, with doctors who qualified at different times, and with doctors who were at different stages of their careers at the time of survey.

METHOD

The UK Medical Careers Research Group (MCRG) has surveyed all UK medical graduates from nine year-of-graduation cohorts: 1974, 1983, 1988, 1993, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2002, and 2008. Doctors were surveyed at different times after graduation ranging 3–24 years, in surveys which took place between 1996 and 2013. Some cohorts were surveyed more than once. The MCRG used postal and email questionnaires and up to four reminders were sent to non-responders. Further details of the methodology are available elsewhere.8 In each of 19 surveys conducted over a 17-year period, among other questions the MCRG asked doctors to rate their level of positivity about their career prospects. In 12 of the surveys this was done by rating agreement with the following statement: ‘My career prospects are good’ (the statement offered a 5-point scale covering ‘strongly agree’, ‘agree’, ‘neither agree nor disagree’, ‘disagree’, and ‘strongly disagree’, with a ‘no opinion’ option). Occasionally the authors used ‘My future career prospects are good’, and in seven surveys they used the wording ‘I am satisfied with my future career prospects’, with the same response rating options. The responses were analysed on the 5-point scale, and re-analysed on a 3-point scale (with ‘strongly agree’ and ‘agree’ combined, and ‘strongly disagree’ combined with ‘disagree’).

How this fits in

Previous research among GPs has found that low job satisfaction is associated with higher levels of intentions to leave medicine. In this context the authors decided to compare the views of GPs and other doctors about their career prospects, using data from the UK Medical Careers Research Group studies collected over many years. Most GPs were positive about their prospects. However, the level of negativity among GPs about their future career prospects increased with increasing seniority: this was not seen in hospital doctors. To avoid possible confusion with job satisfaction, the authors refer in the analysis to agreement or disagreement that ‘My career prospects are good’. In all, the authors surveyed 37 332 UK doctors from nine different cohorts. The statement about future prospects was included in surveys of the cohorts of 1974, 1983 and 2008 on one occasion, those of 1988, 1999, 2000, and 2002 twice, the cohort of 1996 three times, and the cohort of 1993 five times. The cohorts ranged in size from 2347 graduates in 1974 to 6795 graduates in 2008. The authors investigated the doctors’ level of agreement that their career prospects were good. In particular the authors were interested in whether doctors working in general practice differed from doctors working in other specialties. Doctors’ descriptions of their specialty of working were grouped by the authors into 13 specialty groups comprising: adult hospital medical specialties, paediatrics, emergency medicine, hospital surgical specialties, obstetrics and gynaecology, anaesthetics, radiology, clinical oncology, pathology, psychiatry, general practice, community health, and public health. The authors were also interested in variation in agreement or disagreement about career prospects by time since graduation, by sex, and by year when surveyed. Responses were compared using χ2 tests for two-sample comparisons (reporting Yates’s continuity correction where there was only one degree of freedom). The authors used binary logistic regression to analyse the effect of factors in combination. Regression analyses used only those variables which were significant as single variables. For convenience of analysis, time since graduation was grouped into 3–5 years, 6–11 years, and 12–24 years; survey year was grouped into 1996 to 1999, 2000 to 2005, and 2010 to 2013; and specialty group for some analyses was further aggregated into four specialty groups: (adult) hospital medical specialties, hospital surgical specialties, general practice, and other hospital specialties combined (paediatrics, emergency medicine, obstetrics and gynaecology, anaesthetics, radiology, clinical oncology, pathology, and psychiatry).

RESULTS

Response rates

The aggregated response rate from contactable doctors, over all 19 surveys, was 68.3% (47 274/69 264; Appendix 1). Of the 47 274 survey responses, 8.4% (3956) answered ‘no opinion’ or did not select any of the possible responses to the question about career prospects. For the rest of this study, these were omitted, giving a total of 43 318 responses on the 5-point scale.

Results on career prospects, using the latest data from each graduation year

Combining all responses from the latest survey of each graduation year, comprising nine surveys (20 940 responders), 14.1% of GPs strongly agreed that their future prospects were good, 52.1% agreed, 24.1% neither agreed nor disagreed, 7.7% disagreed, and 2.0% strongly disagreed (Table 1). For convenience, for the rest of the results, percentages are reported on a 3-point scale.
Table 1.

Percentage agreement with future career prospects statement, by specialty grouping and sex, for the latest survey of each graduation year[a,b]

Sex and specialty groupingStatement: My future career prospects are goodc

Strongly agree, %Agree, %Neither agree nor disagree, %Disagree, %Strongly disagree, %Total, n (%)
Males and females
GPs14.152.124.17.72.06939 (100)
Hospital doctors18.056.217.66.51.810 943 (100)

Males
GPs15.648.724.68.22.92995 (100)
Hospital doctors20.556.516.45.21.56097 (100)

Females
GPs13.054.723.77.41.33944 (100)
Hospital doctors14.855.819.08.22.14846 (100)

Includes results from the following surveys; 1974 and 1983 cohorts in 1998; 1996 cohort in 2003; 1988 cohort in 2004; 1993 cohort in 2010; 1999 and 2000 cohorts in 2012; 2002 and 2008 cohorts in 2013.

Excludes doctors who were working in non-medical jobs or were not in paid employment.

See Method for details of wording variation in the statement in some surveys.

Percentage agreement with future career prospects statement, by specialty grouping and sex, for the latest survey of each graduation year[a,b] Includes results from the following surveys; 1974 and 1983 cohorts in 1998; 1996 cohort in 2003; 1988 cohort in 2004; 1993 cohort in 2010; 1999 and 2000 cohorts in 2012; 2002 and 2008 cohorts in 2013. Excludes doctors who were working in non-medical jobs or were not in paid employment. See Method for details of wording variation in the statement in some surveys. The GPs were less positive about their prospects than were the hospital doctors (z = −11.2, P<0.001) and showed 66.2% agreement that prospects were good compared with 74.2% for the hospital doctors. A larger percentage of responses from GPs showed uncertainty about prospects (24.1%) than was the case for the hospital doctors (17.6%). A negative view of prospects was a little higher among GPs (9.7%) than among hospital doctors (8.3%). Female GPs were marginally less positive about their prospects than female hospital doctors (z = −2.6, P = 0.01; 67.7% satisfied compared with 70.6%). Among males the difference was larger: 64.3% of GPs and 77.0% of hospital doctors were positive (z = −11.9, P<0.001). Appendix 2 shows the aggregated results for all surveys. The overall results for each of the 19 surveys are shown in Appendix 3.

Statistical analysis of 15 surveys

Balance

In further analysis, the authors wanted to use more of the available 19 surveys, while ensuring that the most frequently surveyed cohorts, those of 1993 and 1996, did not contribute disproportionately to the analysis. The authors omitted four surveys of the 19 undertaken; see Appendix 4 for details. This enabled a balance to be achieved when considering results by year of survey and by years since graduation, whereby the 1996 to 1999 year of survey group featured the graduates of 1974, 1983, 1988, 1993, and 1996 once each, the 2000 to 2005 group featured the graduates of 1988, 1996, 1999, 2000, 2002, and 1993 once each, and the 2010 to 2013 group featured the graduates of 1993, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2008 once each. When considered by years since graduation, the 15 surveys comprised at 3–5 years after graduation the graduates of 1996, 2000, 2002, 2008 once each; at 6–11 years the graduates of 1988, 1993, 1996, 1999, and 2002 once each; and at 12–24 years the graduates of 1974, 1983, 1988, 1993, 1999, and 2000 once each.

Subgroups

Within the 15 surveys considered here, there were statistically significant differences in the percentages of those who were positive about their future prospects (that is, those who strongly agreed or agreed that their prospects were good) when comparing groups by each of specialty group, survey year, number of years since graduation, and sex: see the univariable analysis results in Table 2. However, the percentage differences between the subgroups were modest. When all factors were entered into a logistic regression model simultaneously (Table 2; Multivariable analysis) each factor remained significant. GPs showed a slightly higher level of agreement that their prospects were good, compared with surgeons and those in the hospital medical specialties (Table 2). There was no evident trend across the three periods of survey year or years since graduation. Re-analysis with ‘disagreement’ as the criterion (Appendix 5) gave very similar results.
Table 2.

Agreement that future prospects were good: UK medical graduates by years after graduation, sex, survey year, and specialty

PredictorGroupAgreement that prospects were goodUnivariate analysisaMultivariate analysis



%n/Ndfχ2P-valueWaldP-value
SpecialtyGeneral practice70.57233/10 259
Hospital medical specialties69.83818/5467388.9<0.001104.6<0.001
Surgery68.12755/4048
Other hospital74.68252/11 057

SexMales72.310 853/15 00917.6<0.0148.3<0.001
Females70.811 205/15 822

Years after graduation3–570.26022/85792234.3<0.001268.4<0.001
6–1176.88068/10 502
12–2467.87968/11 750

Survey year1996 to 199965.16881/10 5662381.2<0.001437.6<0.001
2000 to 200577.18323/10 799
2010 to 201372.46854/9266

‘Univariable’ denotes single factor χ2 test for each predictor. ‘Multivariable’ denotes binomial logistic regression result for each predictor with all other predictors in the model. Cases are excluded where one or more predictors were missing, which reduced the sample size from 37 229 to 30 541.

The univariable analysis here refers to the prospects variable with three levels: agree, neither, disagree. df = degrees of freedom.

Agreement that future prospects were good: UK medical graduates by years after graduation, sex, survey year, and specialty ‘Univariable’ denotes single factor χ2 test for each predictor. ‘Multivariable’ denotes binomial logistic regression result for each predictor with all other predictors in the model. Cases are excluded where one or more predictors were missing, which reduced the sample size from 37 229 to 30 541. The univariable analysis here refers to the prospects variable with three levels: agree, neither, disagree. df = degrees of freedom.

Sex differences

There were modest differences in the views about career prospects between the sexes. However, female GPs were more positive about their career prospects than male GPs, with 72.2% of females and 68.1% of males holding a positive view (χ21 = 19.9, P<0.001). In the other specialty groups males were more positive than females (Table 3: χ21 = 12.6, 14.6, 39.3 for surgery, medical specialties, and other hospital specialties respectively; all P<0.001).
Table 3.

Percentage agreement with future career prospects statement, by sex and specialty

Sex and specialtyAgreement, %Neither, %Disagreement, %Total, n (%)
Females
  GP72.220.47.46078 (100)
  Surgery63.617.119.31041 (100)
  Medical specialties67.418.713.92721 (100)
  Other hospital specialties72.216.511.35982 (100)

Males
  GP68.121.910.04181 (100)
  Surgery69.616.613.83007 (100)
  Medical specialties72.217.510.32746 (100)
  Other hospital specialties77.514.87.75075 (100)
Percentage agreement with future career prospects statement, by sex and specialty

Time since graduation

Much larger differences in views about prospects were found when comparing ‘time from graduation’ in different specialties. GPs became less positive about their career prospects the longer they had worked since graduation, while for surgeons the reverse was true (Figure 1). Among doctors surveyed 3–5 years after graduation, GPs held more positive views than doctors in other specialty groups about their future career prospects (χ26 = 514.2, P<0.001; Figure 1): for example, 86.3% of GPs were positive about their future career prospects compared with 52.9% of surgeons.
Figure 1.

Comparing doctors surveyed 12–24 years after graduation, however, GPs were less likely than doctors working in other specialties to be positive about their future career prospects (χ26 = 227.6, P<0.001): for example, 60.2% of GPs and 76.6% of surgeons were positive about their prospects.

Year of survey

For each of the four specialty groups, the level of agreement that career prospects were good, was compared across the three ‘year of survey’ periods (Figure 2). For GPs, those in the hospital medical specialties, those in surgery, and those in other hospital specialties, the year groups differed in their levels of agreement (χ24 = 464.8, 132.7, 96.3 and 32.5 respectively; all P<0.001). GPs who were surveyed between 2000 and 2005 (82.1%) rated their prospects higher than GPs who were surveyed between 1996 and 1999 (59.3%) and those surveyed between 2010 and 2013 (72.1%). There was a similar peak between 2000 and 2005 for doctors in other hospital specialties (Figure 2).
Figure 2.

Comparison of perceived career prospects, comparing prospects at years 1 and 5 years after graduation

Doctors graduating in years 1999, 2000, and 2002 stated their views of their prospects in years 1 and year 5 and their responses were matched (Appendix 6). Classifying responders by specialty based on their posts held in year 5, only 6.2% of GPs became more positive about their prospects by year 5, compared with 31.6% of surgeons, and 23.4% of GPs became more negative about their prospects by year 5, compared with 14.0% of surgeons (both Wilcoxon and marginal homogeneity tests gave P<0.001 in each case). This corresponds to the earlier findings of increasing positivity among surgeons and decreasing positivity among GPs, with increasing time since graduation (Figure 1).

DISCUSSION

Summary

Overall, most GPs were positive about their future career prospects, as were most doctors in hospital-based specialties. Compared with GPs, surgeons showed slightly lower levels of positivity and doctors working in hospital specialties other than medical specialties or surgery showed slightly higher levels. One-fifth of GPs were undecided about their prospects. Dissatisfaction with prospects was marginally higher among male GPs compared with male hospital doctors: for females the reverse was true. GPs’ satisfaction with their prospects was lower among doctors surveyed later in their careers: for surgeons, the reverse was true. One possibility with some of the hospital specialties (perhaps notably with the surgical specialties) is that, in the early years, the doctors are concerned that they may not progress to senior posts within the specialty. Compared with the GPs at a similar stage, the specialists are still competing for career progression in terms of increasing seniority. As time progresses, and the individuals in the hospital specialties are successful, this in itself may increase their confidence about their future prospects. Females working in hospital specialties were less likely than males in hospital specialties to be positive about their future career prospects. By contrast, female GPs were more positive about their future career prospects than male GPs. Female GPs, like females working in the ‘other’ hospital specialties, were more positive about their future prospects than females working in hospital medical specialties and surgery. Males working in other hospital specialties were more likely than doctors working in the other specialties to agree that they were positive about their future career prospects.

Strengths and limitations

The study was national and included all UK medical schools. It covered many graduation years from 1974 to 2008 and data were collected between 1996 and 2013. The response rates for each survey were good. The authors are an independent research group and they believe they receive honest answers from doctors. Due to the nature of survey research methodology there is the possibility of responder bias. Some graduation cohorts were surveyed more often than others. To prevent any disproportionate contribution to the analysis from these cohorts, the authors used a balanced design, which means that in some of the analyses not all of the survey data were used.

Comparison with existing literature

Most GPs were positive about their future career prospects. This tallies with other indicators of career motivation observed recently: 47% of GPs would recommend general practice as a career choice;3 87% of GPs were satisfied with work and training, and 72% were satisfied with work–life balance.9 Female GPs were more positive about their future career prospects than male GPs; also, female GPs were more positive about their future prospects than females working in hospital medical specialties and surgery. Compatibility of general practice with family life is a factor.10 Female and male GPs may compare their situations to their peers in other specialties favourably, (in the case of some female GPs or unfavourably, (in the case of some male GPs). Nearly one-quarter of GPs became more negative about their prospects by their fifth year after graduation. This could be due to a gradual realisation of the many challenges faced by GPs currently in terms of an ageing workforce, increasing workload, and increased patient demand.2,3 The latest data reported in this study were collected in 2013: in 2016, increasing pressures on service delivery suggest that this negative trend may continue.

Implications for research and practice

Although the profile of views about career prospects was broadly positive for GPs, as it was for other doctors, there were some concerns. Specifically, the authors noted among GPs an increase in negative views of career prospects with increasing length of time since graduation, which is not seen in hospital doctors, and these changes were more noticeable among male GPs than among female GPs. Research into the causes of this negativity, and the introduction of policy measures to ameliorate its causes, would contribute to the continued commitment of GPs and may help to reduce attrition of senior GPs from the profession.
Year of surveyCohortYears after graduationCohort, nContactable,anResponse n(%)Answered question, nDid not answer/‘no opinion‘, n
199619933366735172777 (79.0)2482295
1998197424234721381716 (80.3)163383
198315384536512879 (78.9)2621258
1999198811373735702726 (76.4)2503223
19936366735602731 (76.7)2590141
19963386837772721 (72.0)2593128
200119965386836742521 (68.6)2287234
200219939366734512437 (70.6)240631
200319967386836822410 (65.5)237733
2004198816373734932521 (72.2)245269
199311366734902310 (66.2)2197113
200519996421339882660 (66.7)2417243
20005442841202703 (65.6)2485218
20023443242392748 (64.8)2297451
2010199317366734702505 (72.2)2389116
2012199913421340302255 (56.0)12071048b
200012442842002229 (53.1)214782
2013200211443231962056 (64.3)196096
20085679540182369 (59.0)227594

Total76 54669 26447 274 (68.3)43 3183956

Excludes those with no address, deceased, not registered, or refusing to take part.

Owing to a printing error, one mailing excluded the statement about career prospects.

SpecialtyMy career prospects are good

Strongly agree, %Agree, %Neither agree nor disagree, %Disagree, %Strongly Disagree, %Total

n%
All
  GP16.654.520.86.71.512 509100
  Hospital medical specialties15.854.518.58.92.37150100
  Surgery17.750.617.210.63.85234100
  Other hospital17.557.715.67.31.914 315100
  Non-hospital medical20.145.819.010.84.41280100
  Total17.054.818.08.02.140 488100

Males
  GP17.451.721.57.42.15039100
  Hospital medical specialties17.355.417.97.61.73633100
  Surgery18.650.817.29.83.73905100
  Other hospital20.257.814.75.61.66570100
  Non-hospital medical27.344.516.88.62.7512100
  Total18.854.117.67.42.219 659100

Females
  GP16.056.420.36.21.17470100
  Hospital medical specialties14.353.519.110.22.93517100
  Surgery15.150.117.213.24.41329100
  Other hospital15.357.616.38.82.17745100
  Non-hospital medical15.246.620.412.25.5768100
  Total15.455.618.48.52.120 829100

Note that this table excludes 2830 doctors who were working in non-medical jobs or were not in paid employment.

CohortMy career prospects are good

Survey yearStrongly Agree, %Agree, %Neither, %Disagree, %Strongly disagree, %Total, n
1974199820.035.727.411.85.11633
1983199820.041.924.210.23.72621
1988199923.545.819.88.32.72503
200417.254.420.66.11.82452
199319968.960.323.36.51.02482
199913.659.317.57.02.72590
200215.955.318.28.62.02406
200418.860.715.44.01.12197
2010a0.068.026.15.90.02389
199619999.449.717.518.44.92593
200118.155.914.09.52.52287
200319.963.011.64.8.72377
1999200526.155.710.66.21.42417
201219.752.118.87.61.71207
2000200526.351.113.76.82.12485
201220.953.018.66.11.52147
2002200510.057.313.114.15.42297
201319.552.919.16.52.01960
2008201314.359.515.68.02.62275

Total16.854.618.08.32.443 318

This table excludes doctors who did not reply to the question or who selected ‘no opinion’.

The 1993 in 2010 survey only offered three responses: Agree, Neither agree nor disagree, and Disagree.

Survey yearYears after graduation

3–56–1112–24



1996–19992000–20052010–20131996–19992000–20052010–20131996–19992000–20052010–2013
Surveys included1993 in 19962002 in 20052008 in 20131993 in 19991999 in 20052002 in 20121983 in 19981988 in 20042000 in 2012
1996 in 19991996 in 20011988 in 19991996 in 20031974 in 19981999 in 2012
2000 in 20051993 in 20021993 in 2010
1993 in 2004

The surveys shown in shaded cells were not included in statistical analysis (see ’Balance’ section of Results).

PredictorGroupDisagreement that prospects were goodUnivariate analysisaMultivariate analysis



%n/Ndfχ2P-valueWaldP-value
SpecialtyGeneral practice8.5869/10 259
Hospital medical specialties12.1659/54673161.8<0.001150.3<0.001
Surgery15.2617/4048
Other hospital9.71069/11 057

SexMale10.11510/15 00913.8<0.0526.2<0.001
Female10.81704/15 822

Years after graduation3–514.91279/85792266.9<0.001266.4<0.001
6–117.9828/10 502
12–249.41107/11 750

Survey year1996–199913.91470/10 5662219.3<0.001304.7<0.001
2000–20059.2993/10 799
2010–20137.9751/9466

‘Univariable’ denotes single factor χ2 test for each predictor. ‘Multivariable’ denotes binomial logistic regression result for each predictor with all other predictors in the model. Cases were excluded where one or more predictors were missing, which reduced the sample size from 37 229 to 30 541.

The univariable analysis here refers to the prospects variable with two levels: agree versus neither and disagree combined. df = degrees of freedom.

Prospects at 1 yearProspects at 5 years

AgreeNeitherDisagreeTotal
GPs
  Agree54615332731
  Neither3713454
  Disagree76821
  Total59017244806

Hospital medical specialists
  Agree45311729599
  Neither993010139
  Disagree622918109
  Total61417657847

Surgeons
  Agree2825230364
  Neither77308115
  Disagree963037163
  Total45511275642

Other hospital specialists
  Agree924166721162
  Neither1034219164
  Disagree783029137
  Total11052381201463

Notes: Wilcoxon (W) and marginal homogeneity (MH) test results were as follows. W: GPs P<0.001; hospital medical specialists P = 0.004; surgeons P<0.001; other hospital P = 0.29. MH: GPs P<0.001; hospital medical specialists P = 0.007; surgeons P<0.001; other hospital P = 0.19.

  5 in total

1.  Leaving medicine: the consequences of physician dissatisfaction.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon; James D Reschovsky; Hoangmai H Pham; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Motivation for career choice and job satisfaction of GP trainees and newly qualified GPs across Europe: a seven countries cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Marco Roos; Jessica Watson; Michel Wensing; Frank Peters-Klimm
Journal:  Educ Prim Care       Date:  2014-07

3.  Motivation and satisfaction in GP training: a UK cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Jessica Watson; Alison Humphrey; Frank Peters-Klimm; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Participation in medicine by graduates of medical schools in the United Kingdom up to 25 years post graduation: national cohort surveys.

Authors:  Michael J Goldacre; Trevor W Lambert
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007-14.

Authors:  F D Richard Hobbs; Clare Bankhead; Toqir Mukhtar; Sarah Stevens; Rafael Perera-Salazar; Tim Holt; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Employment as HIV Prevention: An Employment Support Intervention for Adolescent Men Who Have Sex With Men and Adolescent Transgender Women of Color.

Authors:  Brandon J Hill; Darnell N Motley; Kris Rosentel; Alicia VandeVusse; Charlie Fuller; Shannon M E Bowers; Meghan Williams; Michele Kipke; Lisa Kuhns; Nicole Pashka; Sari Reisner; Justin B DeMonte; Rachel W Goolsby; Betty M Rupp; Nicole Slye; Lisa C Strader; John A Schneider; Lisa Razzano; Robert Garofalo
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.771

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.