Literature DB >> 27578811

Self-monitoring blood pressure in patients with hypertension: an internet-based survey of UK GPs.

Benjamin R Fletcher1, Lisa Hinton1, Emma P Bray2, Andrew Hayen3, Fd Richard Hobbs1, Jonathan Mant4, John F Potter5, Richard J McManus1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research suggests that most GPs in the UK use self-monitoring of blood pressure (SMBP) to monitor the control of hypertension rather than for diagnosis. This study sought to assess current practice in the use of self-monitoring and any changes in practice following more recent guideline recommendations. AIM: To survey the views and practice of UK GPs in 2015 with regard to SMBP and compare them with a previous survey carried out in 2011. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Web-based survey of a regionally representative sample of 300 UK GPs.
METHOD: GPs completed an online questionnaire concerning the use of SMBP in the management of hypertension. Analyses comprised descriptive statistics, tests for between-group differences (z, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and χ2 tests), and multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Results were available for 300 GPs (94% of those who started the survey). GPs reported using self-monitoring to diagnose hypertension (169/291; 58%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 52 to 64) and to monitor control (245/291; 84%; 95% CI = 80 to 88), the former having significantly increased since 2011 (from 37%; 95% CI = 33 to 41; P<0.001) with no change in monitoring for control. More than half of GPs used higher systolic thresholds for diagnosis (118/169; 70%; 95% CI = 63 to 77) and treatment (168/225; 75%; 95% CI = 69 to 80) than recommended in guidelines, and under half (120/289; 42%; 95% CI = 36 to 47) adjusted the SMBP results to guide treatment decisions.
CONCLUSION: Since new UK national guidance in 2011, GPs are more likely to use SMBP to diagnose hypertension. However, significant proportions of GPs continue to use non-standard diagnostic and monitoring thresholds. The use of out-of-office methods to improve the accuracy of diagnosis is unlikely to be beneficial if suboptimal thresholds are used. © British Journal of General Practice 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure monitoring, self; general practice; hypertension

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27578811      PMCID: PMC5072921          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  21 in total

1.  Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: the Finn-Home study.

Authors:  Teemu J Niiranen; Marjo-Riitta Hänninen; Jouni Johansson; Antti Reunanen; Antti M Jula
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  The 2015 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for blood pressure measurement, diagnosis, assessment of risk, prevention, and treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Stella S Daskalopoulou; Doreen M Rabi; Kelly B Zarnke; Kaberi Dasgupta; Kara Nerenberg; Lyne Cloutier; Mark Gelfer; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche; Alain Milot; Peter Bolli; Donald W McKay; Guy Tremblay; Donna McLean; Sheldon W Tobe; Marcel Ruzicka; Kevin D Burns; Michel Vallée; G V Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Ross D Feldman; Peter Selby; Andrew Pipe; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Philip A McFarlane; Paul Oh; Robert A Hegele; Milan Khara; Thomas W Wilson; S Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Robert J Herman; Simon L Bacon; Simon W Rabkin; Richard E Gilbert; Tavis S Campbell; Steven Grover; George Honos; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts; Gord Gubitz; Norman R C Campbell; Gordon W Moe; Jonathan G Howlett; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Ally Prebtani; Pierre Larochelle; Lawrence A Leiter; Charlotte Jones; Richard I Ogilvie; Vincent Woo; Janusz Kaczorowski; Luc Trudeau; Robert J Petrella; Swapnil Hiremath; James A Stone; Denis Drouin; Kim L Lavoie; Pavel Hamet; George Fodor; Jean C Grégoire; Anne Fournier; Richard Lewanczuk; George K Dresser; Mukul Sharma; Debra Reid; Geneviève Benoit; Janusz Feber; Kevin C Harris; Luc Poirier; Raj S Padwal
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  How and why do patients use home blood pressure monitors?

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Lauren W Cohen; Cheryl Madeline Mitchell; Philip D Sloane
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.444

4.  The impact of the day of the week on home blood pressure: the Finn-Home study.

Authors:  Eeva P Juhanoja; Pauli J Puukka; Jouni K Johansson; Teemu J Niiranen; Antti M Jula
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.444

5.  Clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring: meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Tiziana Gazzola; Giorgia Carabelli; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Patients' preference for ambulatory versus home blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  E G Nasothimiou; N Karpettas; M G Dafni; G S Stergiou
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 7.  Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rajiv Agarwal; Jennifer E Bills; Tyler J W Hecht; Robert P Light
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Prevalence of home blood pressure measurement among selected hypertensive patients: results of a multicenter survey from six hospital outpatient hypertension clinics in Italy.

Authors:  Cesare Cuspidi; Stefano Meani; Laura Lonati; Veronica Fusi; Gaia Magnaghi; Guido Garavelli; Gaetana Palumbo; Claudio Pini; Alvaro Vaccarella; Gianfranco Parati; Gastone Leonetti; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Cost estimation of hypertension management based on home blood pressure monitoring alone or combined office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements.

Authors:  Nadia Boubouchairopoulou; Nikos Karpettas; Kostas Athanasakis; Anastasios Kollias; Athanase D Protogerou; Apostolos Achimastos; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2014-07-16

Review 10.  The Effect of Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure on Medication Adherence and Lifestyle Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin R Fletcher; Jaime Hartmann-Boyce; Lisa Hinton; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.689

View more
  19 in total

1.  Trends in the diagnosis and management of hypertension: repeated primary care survey in South West England.

Authors:  Natasha Mejzner; Christopher E Clark; Lindsay Fp Smith; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Acceptability and psychological impact of out-of-office monitoring to diagnose hypertension: an evaluation of survey data from primary care patients.

Authors:  Alice C Tompson; Alison M Ward; Richard J McManus; Rafael Perera; Matthew J Thompson; Carl J Heneghan; David Nunan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Home blood pressure monitoring and adherence in patients with hypertension on primary prevention treatment: a survey of 1026 patients in general medicine in the Auvergne region.

Authors:  Jéromine Trefond; Lucie Hermet; Céline Lambert; Hélène Vaillant-Roussel; Denis Pouchain; Thibault Ménini; Bruno Pereira; Philippe Vorilhon
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Patient experience of home and waiting room blood pressure measurement: a qualitative study of patients with recently diagnosed hypertension.

Authors:  Alice C Tompson; Claire L Schwartz; Susannah Fleming; Alison M Ward; Sheila M Greenfield; Sabrina Grant; Fd Richard Hobbs; Carl J Heneghan; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Blood pressure measurement: a call to arms.

Authors:  Christine A'Court; James Sheppard; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Current practice of usual clinic blood pressure measurement in people with and without diabetes: a survey and prospective 'mystery shopper' study in UK primary care.

Authors:  Sarah L Stevens; Richard J McManus; Richard John Stevens
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Efficacy of self-monitored blood pressure, with or without telemonitoring, for titration of antihypertensive medication (TASMINH4): an unmasked randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard J McManus; Jonathan Mant; Marloes Franssen; Alecia Nickless; Claire Schwartz; James Hodgkinson; Peter Bradburn; Andrew Farmer; Sabrina Grant; Sheila M Greenfield; Carl Heneghan; Susan Jowett; Una Martin; Siobhan Milner; Mark Monahan; Sam Mort; Emma Ogburn; Rafael Perera-Salazar; Syed Ahmar Shah; Ly-Mee Yu; Lionel Tarassenko; F D Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  New Approaches in Hypertension Management: a Review of Current and Developing Technologies and Their Potential Impact on Hypertension Care.

Authors:  Jamie Kitt; Rachael Fox; Katherine L Tucker; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Patient preferences for management of high blood pressure in the UK: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Benjamin Fletcher; Lisa Hinton; Richard McManus; Oliver Rivero-Arias
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Home blood pressure monitoring in France: Device possession rate and associated determinants, the Esteban study.

Authors:  Alexandre Vallée; Amélie Gabet; Clémence Grave; Hélène Lelong; Jacques Blacher; Valérie Olié
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.