Madeline R Carins Murphy1, Gregory J Jordan1, Timothy J Brodribb2. 1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia. 2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia timothyb@utas.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It has been proposed that modification of leaf size, driven by epidermal cell size, balances leaf water supply (determined by veins) with transpirational demand (generated by stomata) during acclimation to local irradiance. We aimed to determine whether this is a general pattern among plant species with contrasting growth habits. METHODS: We compared observed relationships between leaf minor vein density, stomatal density, epidermal cell size and leaf size in four pairs of herbs and woody species from the same families grown under sun and shade conditions with modelled relationships assuming vein and stomatal densities respond passively to epidermal cell expansion. Leaf lignin content was also quantified to assess whether construction costs of herbaceous leaf veins differ from those of woody plants and the leaf mass fraction invested in veins. KEY RESULTS: Modelled relationships accurately described observed relationships, indicating that in all species, co-ordinated changes to the density of minor veins and stomata were mediated by a common relationship between epidermal cell size, vein density and stomatal density, with little or no impact from stomatal index. This co-ordination was independent of changes in leaf size and is likely to be an adaptive process driven by the significant proportion of biomass invested in veins (13·1 % of sun leaf dry weight and 21·7 % of shade leaf dry weight). Relative costs of venation increased in the shade, intensifying selective pressure towards economizing investment in vein density. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of epidermal cell size appears to be a general mechanism among our experimental species to maintain a constant ratio between leaf anatomical traits that control leaf water fluxes independently of habit. We propose that this process may co-ordinate plasticity in hydraulic supply and demand in the majority of eudicot angiosperms.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It has been proposed that modification of leaf size, driven by epidermal cell size, balances leaf water supply (determined by veins) with transpirational demand (generated by stomata) during acclimation to local irradiance. We aimed to determine whether this is a general pattern among plant species with contrasting growth habits. METHODS: We compared observed relationships between leaf minor vein density, stomatal density, epidermal cell size and leaf size in four pairs of herbs and woody species from the same families grown under sun and shade conditions with modelled relationships assuming vein and stomatal densities respond passively to epidermal cell expansion. Leaf lignin content was also quantified to assess whether construction costs of herbaceous leaf veins differ from those of woody plants and the leaf mass fraction invested in veins. KEY RESULTS: Modelled relationships accurately described observed relationships, indicating that in all species, co-ordinated changes to the density of minor veins and stomata were mediated by a common relationship between epidermal cell size, vein density and stomatal density, with little or no impact from stomatal index. This co-ordination was independent of changes in leaf size and is likely to be an adaptive process driven by the significant proportion of biomass invested in veins (13·1 % of sun leaf dry weight and 21·7 % of shade leaf dry weight). Relative costs of venation increased in the shade, intensifying selective pressure towards economizing investment in vein density. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of epidermal cell size appears to be a general mechanism among our experimental species to maintain a constant ratio between leaf anatomical traits that control leaf water fluxes independently of habit. We propose that this process may co-ordinate plasticity in hydraulic supply and demand in the majority of eudicot angiosperms.
Authors: Samuel C V Martins; Jeroni Galmés; Paulo C Cavatte; Lucas F Pereira; Marília C Ventrella; Fábio M Damatta Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: José M Torres-Ruiz; Antoine Kremer; Madeline R Carins Murphy; Tim Brodribb; Laurent J Lamarque; Laura Truffaut; Fabrice Bonne; Alexis Ducousso; Sylvain Delzon Journal: Tree Physiol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Scott A M McAdam; Morgane P Eléouët; Melanie Best; Timothy J Brodribb; Madeline Carins Murphy; Sam D Cook; Marion Dalmais; Theodore Dimitriou; Ariane Gélinas-Marion; Warwick M Gill; Matthew Hegarty; Julie M I Hofer; Mary Maconochie; Erin L McAdam; Peter McGuiness; David S Nichols; John J Ross; Frances C Sussmilch; Shelley Urquhart Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Teresa Faddetta; Loredana Abbate; Giovanni Renzone; Antonio Palumbo Piccionello; Antonella Maggio; Elisabetta Oddo; Andrea Scaloni; Anna Maria Puglia; Giuseppe Gallo; Francesco Carimi; Sergio Fatta Del Bosco; Francesco Mercati Journal: Plant Mol Biol Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.076
Authors: Luigi Formisano; Michele Ciriello; Valerio Cirillo; Antonio Pannico; Christophe El-Nakhel; Francesco Cristofano; Luigi Giuseppe Duri; Maria Giordano; Youssef Rouphael; Stefania De Pascale Journal: Plants (Basel) Date: 2021-06-09