Elham Ehrampoush1, Peyman Arasteh2, Reza Homayounfar3, Makan Cheraghpour4, Meysam Alipour4, Mohammad Mehdi Naghizadeh5, Maryam Hadibarhaghtalab5, Sayed Hosein Davoodi6, Alireza Askari7, Jalaledin Mirzay Razaz6. 1. Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran; Health Policy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. 2. Department of MPH, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: peyman.arasteh@yahoo.com. 3. Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran; Health Policy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Electronic address: r_homayounfar@yahoo.com. 4. Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 5. Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran. 6. National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 7. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The percent and distribution of body fat are important factors in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases. Our aim was to investigate common anthropometric indices in their relationship with body fat content. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study 1360 healthy individuals (580 men and 780 women) in a cluster sampling, from Ahvaz, Iran, body fat content (using bioelectrical impedance) and anthropometric measurements [weight, waist circumference, a body shape index, abdominal volume index, body adiposity index, conicity, body mass index, hip circumference, waist to hip ratio and waist to height ratio] was obtained. The ROC curve analysis was used to compare each index with body fat percent. RESULTS: Significant difference was found between men and women in all anthropometric parameters (p < 0.001). Women displayed higher percentages in the overweight and obese categories (33.6% vs. 32.9% and 26.4% vs. 22.1%, respectively). In both men and women, the strongest correlations were seen between body fat percent and BMI, AVI and WHtR (r>7.9 and p<0.001). BMI, WHtR and AVI in men and BAI, BMI and WHtR in women showed the most accuracy for estimating body fat percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: All anthropometric parameters could predict body fat percent with relatively good power, however BMI, WHtR and AVI are more powerful predictors. Based on our findings, we suggest using the AVI and WHtR instead of other indexes, as they are better able to assess the accumulation of fat in the abdominal area and are able to more accurately assess body fat percent, which are indicators of chronic disease.
BACKGROUND: The percent and distribution of body fat are important factors in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases. Our aim was to investigate common anthropometric indices in their relationship with body fat content. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study 1360 healthy individuals (580 men and 780 women) in a cluster sampling, from Ahvaz, Iran, body fat content (using bioelectrical impedance) and anthropometric measurements [weight, waist circumference, a body shape index, abdominal volume index, body adiposity index, conicity, body mass index, hip circumference, waist to hip ratio and waist to height ratio] was obtained. The ROC curve analysis was used to compare each index with body fat percent. RESULTS: Significant difference was found between men and women in all anthropometric parameters (p < 0.001). Women displayed higher percentages in the overweight and obese categories (33.6% vs. 32.9% and 26.4% vs. 22.1%, respectively). In both men and women, the strongest correlations were seen between body fat percent and BMI, AVI and WHtR (r>7.9 and p<0.001). BMI, WHtR and AVI in men and BAI, BMI and WHtR in women showed the most accuracy for estimating body fat percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: All anthropometric parameters could predict body fat percent with relatively good power, however BMI, WHtR and AVI are more powerful predictors. Based on our findings, we suggest using the AVI and WHtR instead of other indexes, as they are better able to assess the accumulation of fat in the abdominal area and are able to more accurately assess body fat percent, which are indicators of chronic disease.
Authors: Hee Seon Choi; Young Hye Cho; Sang Yeoup Lee; Eun Ju Park; Yun Jin Kim; Jeong Gyu Lee; Yu Hyeon Yi; Young Jin Tak; Hye Rim Hwang; Seung Hun Lee Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Date: 2019-09-03 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Rafael Molina-Luque; Manuel Romero-Saldaña; Carlos Álvarez-Fernández; Miquel Bennasar-Veny; Álvaro Álvarez-López; Guillermo Molina-Recio Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Parichehr Amiri; Ahmad Zare Javid; Leila Moradi; Neda Haghighat; Rahim Moradi; Hossein Bavi Behbahani; Milad Zarrin; Hadi Bazyar Journal: J Vasc Bras Date: 2021-09-20