Anke Kondla1, Thomas Glaab1, Riccardo Pedersini2, Marek Lommatzsch3. 1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Medical Affairs Respiratory Medicine, Ingelheim, Germany. 2. Kantar Health, Epsom, Surrey, UK; RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain. 3. University of Rostock, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Rostock, Germany. Electronic address: marek.lommatzsch@med.uni-rostock.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence and the characteristics of poor asthma control among adults treated with combinations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) are not completely understood. METHODS: Data from adult patients in Germany with self-reported asthma treated with an ICS-LABA combination in the National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) were analysed. Patients with well-controlled and not well-controlled asthma according to the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score were compared, with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, attitudes, adherence and outcomes. RESULTS: Among the German patients with self-reported asthma (5.2% of the respondents), 16.2% (382 patients) were treated with an ICS-LABA combination and did not report concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis or emphysema. In this subgroup, 55.8% had not well-controlled asthma (ACT < 20). ICS-LABA treated patients with not well-controlled asthma were more likely to report emergency visits (16.4% vs. 8.9%), missed more time from work (absenteeism: 12.9% vs. 4.3%), were more impaired while at work (presenteeism: 29.0% vs. 14.9%) and were more likely to be women (69.0% vs. 57.4%), compared with well-controlled patients. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, smoking, income, education or self-reported adherence between the two groups, but different attitudes regarding the patient-physician relationship. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients treated with ICS and LABA had not well-controlled asthma. These patients did not differ from well-controlled patients in terms of education or self-reported adherence, but in terms of their attitudes regarding the patient-physician relationship.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence and the characteristics of poor asthma control among adults treated with combinations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) are not completely understood. METHODS: Data from adult patients in Germany with self-reported asthma treated with an ICS-LABA combination in the National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) were analysed. Patients with well-controlled and not well-controlled asthma according to the Asthma Control Test (ACT) score were compared, with respect to socio-demographic characteristics, attitudes, adherence and outcomes. RESULTS: Among the German patients with self-reported asthma (5.2% of the respondents), 16.2% (382 patients) were treated with an ICS-LABA combination and did not report concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic bronchitis or emphysema. In this subgroup, 55.8% had not well-controlled asthma (ACT < 20). ICS-LABA treated patients with not well-controlled asthma were more likely to report emergency visits (16.4% vs. 8.9%), missed more time from work (absenteeism: 12.9% vs. 4.3%), were more impaired while at work (presenteeism: 29.0% vs. 14.9%) and were more likely to be women (69.0% vs. 57.4%), compared with well-controlled patients. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, smoking, income, education or self-reported adherence between the two groups, but different attitudes regarding the patient-physician relationship. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients treated with ICS and LABA had not well-controlled asthma. These patients did not differ from well-controlled patients in terms of education or self-reported adherence, but in terms of their attitudes regarding the patient-physician relationship.
Authors: Ian D Pavord; Nicola Mathieson; Anna Scowcroft; Riccardo Pedersini; Gina Isherwood; David Price Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 2.871