Literature DB >> 27578390

Plerixafor as preemptive strategy results in high success rates in autologous stem cell mobilization failure.

Nina Worel1, Gerhard Fritsch2, Hermine Agis3, Alexandra Böhm4, Georg Engelich5, Gerda C Leitner1, Klaus Geissler6, Karoline Gleixner7, Peter Kalhs8, Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch4, Felix Keil9, Gerhard Kopetzky10, Viktor Mayr11, Werner Rabitsch8, Regina Reisner9, Konrad Rosskopf12, Reinhard Ruckser13, Claudia Zoghlami6, Niklas Zojer14, Hildegard T Greinix15.   

Abstract

Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is approved for autologous stem cell mobilization in poor mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma or malignant lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of plerixafor in an immediate rescue approach, administrated subsequently to G-CSF alone or chemotherapy and G-CSF in patients at risk for mobilization failure. Eighty-five patients mobilized with G-CSF alone or chemotherapy were included. Primary endpoint was the efficacy of the immediate rescue approach of plerixafor to achieve ≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for a single or ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for a double transplantation and potential differences between G-CSF and chemotherapy-based mobilization. Secondary objectives included comparison of stem cell graft composition including CD34+ cell and lymphocyte subsets with regard to the mobilization regimen applied. No significant adverse events were recorded. A median 3.9-fold increase in CD34+ cells following plerixafor was observed, resulting in 97% patients achieving at least ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Significantly more differentiated granulocyte and monocyte forming myeloid progenitors were collected after chemomobilization whereas more CD19+ and natural killer cells were collected after G-CSF. Fifty-two patients underwent transplantation showing rapid and durable engraftment, irrespectively of the stem cell mobilization regimen used. The addition of plerixafor in an immediate rescue model is efficient and safe after both, G-CSF and chemomobilization and results in extremely high success rates. Whether the differences in graft composition have a clinical impact on engraftment kinetics, immunologic recovery, and graft durability have to be analysed in larger prospective studies.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding inhibitor; poor stem cell mobilization; preemptive approach

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27578390     DOI: 10.1002/jca.21496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Apher        ISSN: 0733-2459            Impact factor:   2.821


  4 in total

1.  Addition of plerixafor to G-CSF is useful to achieve efficient collection even in very poor mobilizers: hope for patients with diminished hematopoietic function.

Authors:  M Mohty; P Drillat; J-M Grouin; F Bijou; N Milpied; C Chabannon
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Use of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization in the Setting of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantations: An Update.

Authors:  Yavuz M Bilgin
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2021-06-02

3.  Chemical Stability of Plerixafor after Opening of Single-Use Vial.

Authors:  Jack T Seki; Andrea Bozovic; Roy Lee; Rita Kwong; Eshetu G Atenafu; Anna Xu; Jin-Hyeun Huh
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-08-31

4.  Five Days Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment Increases Bone Formation and Reduces Gap Size of a Rat Segmental Bone Defect: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marietta Herrmann; Stephan Zeiter; Ursula Eberli; Maria Hildebrand; Karin Camenisch; Ursula Menzel; Mauro Alini; Sophie Verrier; Vincent A Stadelmann
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.