Literature DB >> 27578318

Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn't?

Jamie Trapp1.   

Abstract

There are often differences in a publication's citation count, depending on the database accessed. Here, aspects of citation counts for medical physics and biomedical engineering papers are studied using papers published in the journal Australasian physical and engineering sciences in medicine. Comparison is made between the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Papers are categorised into subject matter, and citation trends are examined. It is shown that review papers as a group tend to receive more citations on average; however the highest cited individual papers are more likely to be research papers.

Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Citation; Impact factor; Medical physics; Relative citation impact; h index

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27578318     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-016-0478-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  3 in total

1.  Publications in Integrative and Complementary Medicine: A Ten-Year Bibliometric Survey in the Field of ICM.

Authors:  Zuoqi Ding; Furong Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice.

Authors:  Antonio E Mendes; Fernanda S Tonin; Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2016-12-15

3.  Are they publishing? A descriptive cross-sectional profile and bibliometric analysis of the journal publication productivity of Italian physiotherapists.

Authors:  Stefano Vercelli; Elisa Ravizzotti; Matteo Paci
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2018-01-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.