Chiung-Ju Liu1, Deana Marie2, Aaron Fredrick2, Jessica Bertram2, Kristen Utley2, Elaine Ewing Fess2. 1. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University, 1140 West Michigan Street, CF 311, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-5199, USA. liu41@iu.edu. 2. Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Indiana University, 1140 West Michigan Street, CF 311, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-5199, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand function is critical for independence in activities of daily living for older adults. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine how grip strength, arm curl strength, and manual dexterous coordination contributed to time-based versus self-report assessment of hand function in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: Adults aged ≥60 years without low vision or neurological disorders were recruited. Purdue Pegboard Test, Jamar hand dynamometer, 30-second arm curl test, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument were administered to assess manual dexterous coordination, grip strength, arm curl strength, time-based hand function, and self-report of hand function, respectively. RESULTS: Eighty-four adults (mean age = 72 years) completed the study. Hierarchical multiple regressions show that older adults with better arm curl strength (β = -.25, p < .01) and manual dexterous coordination (β = -.52, p < .01) performed better on the time-based hand function test. In comparison, older adults with better grip strength (β = .40, p < .01), arm curl strength (β = .23, p < .05), and manual dexterous coordination (β = .23, p < .05) were associated with better self-report of upper extremity function. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between grip strength and hand function may be test-specific. Grip strength becomes a significant factor when the test requires grip strength to successfully complete the test tasks. Arm curl strength independently contributed to hand function in both time-based and self-report assessments, indicating that strength of extrinsic muscles of the hand are essential for hand function.
BACKGROUND: Hand function is critical for independence in activities of daily living for older adults. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine how grip strength, arm curl strength, and manual dexterous coordination contributed to time-based versus self-report assessment of hand function in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: Adults aged ≥60 years without low vision or neurological disorders were recruited. Purdue Pegboard Test, Jamar hand dynamometer, 30-second arm curl test, Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument were administered to assess manual dexterous coordination, grip strength, arm curl strength, time-based hand function, and self-report of hand function, respectively. RESULTS: Eighty-four adults (mean age = 72 years) completed the study. Hierarchical multiple regressions show that older adults with better arm curl strength (β = -.25, p < .01) and manual dexterous coordination (β = -.52, p < .01) performed better on the time-based hand function test. In comparison, older adults with better grip strength (β = .40, p < .01), arm curl strength (β = .23, p < .05), and manual dexterous coordination (β = .23, p < .05) were associated with better self-report of upper extremity function. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between grip strength and hand function may be test-specific. Grip strength becomes a significant factor when the test requires grip strength to successfully complete the test tasks. Arm curl strength independently contributed to hand function in both time-based and self-report assessments, indicating that strength of extrinsic muscles of the hand are essential for hand function.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aging; Arm strength; Fine motor coordination; Grip strength; Hand function
Authors: Daniel H Craighead; Sean W Shank; Jinger S Gottschall; Dennis H Passe; Bob Murray; Lacy M Alexander; W Larry Kenney Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Simone Ciaccioni; Caterina Pesce; Roberta Forte; Valentina Presta; Angela Di Baldassarre; Laura Capranica; Giancarlo Condello Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Ana Fernández-Araque; Andrea Giaquinta-Aranda; Jose Andrés Rodríguez-Díez; Silvia Carretero-Molinero; Jorge López-López; Zoraida Verde Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Zoraida Verde; Laura García de Diego; Luis M Chicharro; Fernando Bandrés; Verónica Velasco; Teresa Mingo; Ana Fernández-Araque Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Giovanni Fiorilli; Federico Quinzi; Andrea Buonsenso; Giusy Casazza; Luigi Manni; Attilio Parisi; Alfonso Di Costanzo; Giuseppe Calcagno; Marzia Soligo; Alessandra di Cagno Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-20 Impact factor: 3.390