| Literature DB >> 27577610 |
Fanming Jiang1,2, Xiaoxu Han1,2, Hui Zhang1,2, Bin Zhao1,2, Minghui An1,2, Junjie Xu1,2, Zhenxing Chu1,2, Tao Dong3, Hong Shang4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to characterize specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses in men who have sex with men (MSM) subjects infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) CRF01_AE subtype during the first year of infection and impacts on viral control and evolution.Entities:
Keywords: CRF01_AE; CTL; Gag; HIV-1; Immunodominant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27577610 PMCID: PMC5006414 DOI: 10.1186/s12865-016-0166-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Immunol ISSN: 1471-2172 Impact factor: 3.615
Subject demographics and clinical data
| PID | Subtypesa | Median CD4 countsb | Set pointc | HLA types | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLA-A | HLA-B | HLA-C | ||||
| Subject 1 | CRF01_AE | 671 | 2.84 | 01,33 | 07,35 | 07,12 |
| Subject 2 | CRF01_AE | 507 | 2.95 | 02,29 | 27,40 | 02,03 |
| Subject 3 | CRF01_AE | 578 | 3.53 | 03,24 | 15,49 | 07,08 |
| Subject 4 | CRF01_AE | 657 | 3.58 | 02,24 | 13,40 | 03,08 |
| Subject 5 | CRF01_AE | 670 | 3.75 | 02,32 | 13,44 | 03,04 |
| Subject 6 | CRF01_AE | 557 | 4.29 | 01,02 | 15,57 | 06,06 |
| Subject 7 | CRF01_AE | 498 | 4.30 | 02,26 | 38,48 | 08,12 |
| Subject 8 | CRF01_AE | 407 | 4.43 | 02,11 | 13,13 | 02,03 |
| Subject 9 | CRF01_AE | 614 | 4.49 | 02,80 | 15,15 | 03,03 |
| Subject 10 | CRF01_AE | 416 | 4.50 | 02,30 | 13,46 | 01,06 |
| Subject 11 | CRF01_AE | 254 | 4.61 | 02,02 | 15,58 | 03,03 |
| Subject 12 | CRF01_AE | 695 | 4.62 | 02,11 | 40,46 | 01,08 |
| Subject 13 | CRF01_AE | 280 | 5.08 | 02,30 | 13,13 | 06,07 |
| Subject 14 | CRF01_AE | 440 | 5.20 | 02,11 | 15,40 | 03,07 |
| Subject 15 | CRF01_AE | 664 | 5.38 | 11,11 | 35,54 | 01,01 |
aSubtypes were all CRF01_AE cluster II
bMedian CD4 counts were calculated from at least 3 time points from 3 months to 1 year post infection
cSet point was the average viral load from 120 days to 1 year post infection (at least 3 time points)
Fig. 1Characteristics of HIV-specific CTL responses at 3 months and 1 year post infection. The magnitude (a) and breadth (b) of Gag-, Pol- and Nef-specific CTL responses at 3 months and 1 year post infection. Adjusted magnitude (c) and adjusted breadth (d) of Gag-, Pol- and Nef-specific CTL responses at 3 months and 1 year post infection. Adjusted magnitude and adjusted breadth were calculated by dividing the amino acids number of the corresponding protein and multiplying by 100. Circles depict Gag-, Pol- and Nef-specific CTL responses and adjusted responses at 3 months post infection; triangles depict Gag-, Pol- and Nef-specific CTL responses and adjusted responses at 1 year post infection. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Fig. 2Association between viral set point and HIV-1-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. (a–c) Spearman correlation between magnitude of HIV-1-specific responses and set point at 3 months post infection; a Gag, b Pol, c Nef. d–f Spearman correlation between the magnitude of HIV-1-specific responses and set point at 1 year post infection; d Gag, e Pol, f Nef. g–i Spearman correlation between relative magnitude of HIV-1-specific responses and set point at 3 months post infection; g Gag, h Pol, i Nef. j–l Spearman correlation between relative magnitude of HIV-1-specific responses and set point at 1 year post infection; j Gag, k Pol, l Nef. Relative magnitude was defined in this study as the proportion of magnitude in a specific protein to the total virus-specific magnitude
Fig. 3HIV-1-specific CTL kinetics in different subjects. a Subject 2, b Subject 1, c Subject 3, d Subject 4, e Subject 5, f Subject 12, g Subject 6, h Subject 9, i Subject 11, j Subject 7, k Subject 10, l Subject 8, m Subject 13, n Subject 14, o Subject 15. HIV-1-specific CD8+ T-cell against 18 mer overlapping peptides and optimal epitopes are shown as solid lines. Viral loads are shown as dotted lines. Epitopes containing OLPs (overlapping peptides) indicates that it was an 18 mer overlapping peptide, and containing HLA type indicates that it was an optimal epitope restricted by a certain HLA type. Position and sequence of the optimal epitopes see Additional file 2: Table S2. Colored lines represent different protein responses in each subject. Red, green and yellow lines represent Gag, Pol and Nef responses, respectively
Longitudinal sequence analysis of Gag immunodominant epitopes at 3 months post infection
a HLA types in parentheses denote the putative restricting HLA. Underlined sections denote putative epitopes
bDominant time indicates that the epitope had an immunodominant response at a specific time point
cAmino acids in the dashed boxes denote mutation sites. 3M = 3 months, 1Y = 1 year
dTo specify the flanking region mutation in the GI11 epitope in subject 5, we only show the N terminal amino acid sequence