Literature DB >> 27577180

Value of neonicotinoid seed treatments to US soybean farmers.

Terrance Hurley1, Paul Mitchell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The benefits of neonicotinoid seed treatment to soybean farmers have received increased scrutiny. Rather than use data from small-plot experiments, this research uses survey data from 500 US farmers to estimate the benefit of neonicotinoid seed treatments to them. As seed treatment users, farmers are familiar with their benefits in the field and have economic incentives to only use them if they provide value.
RESULTS: Of the surveyed farmers, 51% used insecticide seed treatments, averaging 87% of their soybean area. Farmers indicated that human and environmental safety is an important consideration affecting their pest management decisions and reported aphids as the most managed and important soybean pest. Asking farmers who used seed treatments to state how much value they provided gives an estimate of $US 28.04 ha-1 treated in 2013, net of seed treatment costs. Farmer-reported average yields provided an estimated average yield gain of 128.0 kg ha-1 treated in 2013, or about $US 42.20 ha-1 treated, net of seed treatment costs.
CONCLUSION: These estimates using different data and methods are consistent and suggest the value of insecticide seed treatments to the US soybean farmers who used them in 2013 was around $US 28-42 ha-1 treated, net of seed treatment costs.
© 2016 Society of Chemical Industry. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  insecticide; soybean aphid; survey data

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27577180     DOI: 10.1002/ps.4424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  6 in total

1.  Exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides in the U.S. general population: Data from the 2015-2016 national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Maria Ospina; Lee-Yang Wong; Samuel E Baker; Amanda Bishop Serafim; Pilar Morales-Agudelo; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 2.  Challenges for Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM): the Soybean Example.

Authors:  A F Bueno; A R Panizzi; T E Hunt; P M Dourado; R M Pitta; J Gonçalves
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.434

3.  Change-point analysis of lambda-cyhalothrin efficacy against soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura): identifying practical resistance from field efficacy trials.

Authors:  James P Menger; Arthur V Ribeiro; Bruce D Potter; Robert L Koch
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.462

4.  Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers' Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective.

Authors:  Mingyue Li; Jingjing Wang; Kai Chen; Lianbei Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The Source of Rag5-Mediated Resistance to Soybean Aphids Is Located in the Stem.

Authors:  Kumud Joshi; Joshua L Baumgardner; Madison MacPhail; Shailesh R Acharya; Elizabeth Blotevogel; Franck E Dayan; Punya Nachappa; Vamsi J Nalam
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  IPM reduces insecticide applications by 95% while maintaining or enhancing crop yields through wild pollinator conservation.

Authors:  Jacob R Pecenka; Laura L Ingwell; Rick E Foster; Christian H Krupke; Ian Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.