Literature DB >> 27576696

[Consensus statement: Management of oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation].

Thomas Maria Helms1, Sigmund Silber2, Andreas Schäfer3, Florian Masuhr4, Frederick Palm5, Harald Darius6, Karsten Schrör7, Dietmar Bänsch8, Peter Bramlage9, Johannes Hankowitz9, Christoph A Karle10, Tom Stargardt11, Joachim Weil12, Johann Christoph Geller13.   

Abstract

With the introduction of edoxaban last year in Germany, four nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are now available for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. These novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) represent an attractive new option compared to vitamin K antagonists (e.g., warfarin or phenprocoumon) due to simple use and fewer interactions with other drugs or food. Therefore, no INR monitoring and dosage adjustments are required for NOAC. The compelling clinical advantage of NOAC is the dramatic risk reduction of hemorhagic stroke and intracranial bleeding compared to current standard. In addition, total mortality is significantly reduced by 10 %. These effects are demonstrated for all four NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban). Therefore, current national and international guidelines recommend NOAC as the preferred option or at least as an attractive alternative compared to the former standard of vitamin K antagonists. The economic impact and reimbursement by Statutory Health Insurance (GKV) is of major importance for treatment in an outpatient setting. For apixaban and edoxaban, an additional benefit was granted by the institution of G‑BA and IQWiG in this clinical setting, whereas dabigatran and rivaroxaban were not assessed due to market entrance prior to 2011 before the AMNOG procedure was initiated. The members of this consensus paper recommend NOAC as the preferred option for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are currently not treated with anticoagulant drugs in spite of clear indication for anticoagulation. For new patients with nonvalvular fibrillation, it should be decided on an individual basis which treatment option is adequate for the patient with their respective comorbidities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMNOG procedure; Atrial fibrillation; New oral anticoagulants; Reimbursement; Vitamin K antagonist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27576696     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-016-0447-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  25 in total

1.  Rates, management, and outcome of rivaroxaban bleeding in daily care: results from the Dresden NOAC registry.

Authors:  Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Kati Förster; Sven Pannach; Franziska Ebertz; Vera Gelbricht; Christoph Thieme; Franziska Michalski; Christina Köhler; Sebastian Werth; Kurtulus Sahin; Luise Tittl; Ulrike Hänsel; Norbert Weiss
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation--developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Authors:  A John Camm; Gregory Y H Lip; Raffaele De Caterina; Irene Savelieva; Dan Atar; Stefan H Hohnloser; Gerhard Hindricks; Paulus Kirchhof
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 5.214

Review 3.  What is 'valvular' atrial fibrillation? A reappraisal.

Authors:  Raffaele De Caterina; A John Camm
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Choosing the right drug to fit the patient when selecting oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  A M Shields; G Y H Lip
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Edoxaban: a new oral direct factor xa inhibitor.

Authors:  A John Camm; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  James D Douketis; Alex C Spyropoulos; Scott Kaatz; Richard C Becker; Joseph A Caprini; Andrew S Dunn; David A Garcia; Alan Jacobson; Amir K Jaffer; David F Kong; Sam Schulman; Alexander G G Turpie; Vic Hasselblad; Thomas L Ortel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Stroke due to atrial fibrillation in a population-based stroke registry (Ludwigshafen Stroke Study) CHADS(2) , CHA(2) DS(2) -VASc score, underuse of oral anticoagulation, and implications for preventive measures.

Authors:  F Palm; T Kleemann; M Dos Santos; C Urbanek; F Buggle; A Safer; M G Hennerici; H Becher; R Zahn; A J Grau
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.089

8.  Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert G Hart; Lesly A Pearce; Maria I Aguilar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Potentially preventable strokes in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who are not adequately anticoagulated.

Authors:  David J Gladstone; Esther Bui; Jiming Fang; Andreas Laupacis; M Patrice Lindsay; Jack V Tu; Frank L Silver; Moira K Kapral
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert P Giugliano; Christian T Ruff; Eugene Braunwald; Sabina A Murphy; Stephen D Wiviott; Jonathan L Halperin; Albert L Waldo; Michael D Ezekowitz; Jeffrey I Weitz; Jindřich Špinar; Witold Ruzyllo; Mikhail Ruda; Yukihiro Koretsune; Joshua Betcher; Minggao Shi; Laura T Grip; Shirali P Patel; Indravadan Patel; James J Hanyok; Michele Mercuri; Elliott M Antman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.