Literature DB >> 27576068

Assessing Groundwater Depletion and Dynamics Using GRACE and InSAR: Potential and Limitations.

Pascal Castellazzi, Richard Martel1, Devin L Galloway2, Laurent Longuevergne3, Alfonso Rivera4.   

Abstract

In the last decade, remote sensing of the temporal variation of ground level and gravity has improved our understanding of groundwater dynamics and storage. Mass changes are measured by GRACE (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment) satellites, whereas ground deformation is measured by processing synthetic aperture radar satellites data using the InSAR (Interferometry of Synthetic Aperture Radar) techniques. Both methods are complementary and offer different sensitivities to aquifer system processes. GRACE is sensitive to mass changes over large spatial scales (more than 100,000 km2 ). As such, it fails in providing groundwater storage change estimates at local or regional scales relevant to most aquifer systems, and at which most groundwater management schemes are applied. However, InSAR measures ground displacement due to aquifer response to fluid-pressure changes. InSAR applications to groundwater depletion assessments are limited to aquifer systems susceptible to measurable deformation. Furthermore, the inversion of InSAR-derived displacement maps into volume of depleted groundwater storage (both reversible and largely irreversible) is confounded by vertical and horizontal variability of sediment compressibility. During the last decade, both techniques have shown increasing interest in the scientific community to complement available in situ observations where they are insufficient. In this review, we present the theoretical and conceptual bases of each method, and present idealized scenarios to highlight the potential benefits and challenges of combining these techniques to remotely assess groundwater storage changes and other aspects of the dynamics of aquifer systems.
© 2016, National Ground Water Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27576068     DOI: 10.1111/gwat.12453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  3 in total

1.  Characterization of Groundwater Recharge and Flow in California's San Joaquin Valley From InSAR-Observed Surface Deformation.

Authors:  Wesley R Neely; Adrian A Borsa; Jennifer A Burney; Morgan C Levy; Francesca Silverii; Michelle Sneed
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.240

2.  Using Sentinel-1 and GRACE satellite data to monitor the hydrological variations within the Tulare Basin, California.

Authors:  Donald W Vasco; Kyra H Kim; Tom G Farr; J T Reager; David Bekaert; Simran S Sangha; Jonny Rutqvist; Hiroko K Beaudoing
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Monitoring ground water storage at mesoscale using seismic noise: 30 years of continuous observation and thermo-elastic and hydrological modeling.

Authors:  Thomas Lecocq; Laurent Longuevergne; Helle Anette Pedersen; Florent Brenguier; Klaus Stammler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.