Literature DB >> 27576065

Biospecimen User Fees: Global Feedback on a Calculator Tool.

Lise A M Matzke1, Sindy Babinszky2, Alex Slotty1, Anna Meredith1, Tania Castillo-Pelayo2, Marianne K Henderson3, Daniel Simeon-Dubach4, Brent Schacter5, Peter H Watson1,2,5.   

Abstract

The notion of attributing user fees to researchers for biospecimens provided by biobanks has been discussed frequently in the literature. However, the considerations around how to attribute the cost for these biospecimens and data have, until recently, not been well described. Common across most biobank disciplines are similar factors that influence user fees such as capital and operating costs, internal and external demand, and market competition. A biospecimen user fee calculator tool developed by CTRNet, a tumor biobank network, was published in 2014 and is accessible online at www.biobanking.org . The next year a survey was launched that tested the applicability of this user fee tool among a global health research biobank user base, including both cancer and noncancer biobanking. Participants were first asked to estimate user fee pricing for three hypothetical user scenarios based on their biobanking experience (estimated pricing) and then to calculate fees for the same scenarios using the calculator tool (calculated pricing). Results demonstrated variation in estimated pricing that was reduced by calculated pricing. These results are similar to those found in a similar previous study restricted to a group of Canadian tumor biobanks. We conclude that the use of a biospecimen user fee calculator contributes to reduced variation of user fees and for biobank groups (e.g., biobank networks), could become an important part of a harmonization strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27576065      PMCID: PMC5335806          DOI: 10.1089/bio.2016.0027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  15 in total

1.  Sustainability in Biobanking: Model of Biobank Graz.

Authors:  Karine Sargsyan; Tanja Macheiner; Petra Story; Manuela Strahlhofer-Augsten; Katharina Plattner; Skaiste Riegler; Gabriele Granitz; Michaela Bayer; Berthold Huppertz
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Brave New World.

Authors:  Martin Yuille
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability.

Authors:  Hana Odeh; Lisa Miranda; Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Howard Greenman; Jeffrey McLean; Daniel Reed; Sarfraz Memon; Benjamin Fombonne; Ping Guan; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Biobanking 3.0: evidence based and customer focused biobanking.

Authors:  Daniel Simeon-Dubach; Peter Watson
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.281

5.  Biobanking sustainability--experiences of the Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB).

Authors:  Jane E Carpenter; Christine L Clarke
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Biobank bootstrapping: is biobank sustainability possible through cost recovery?

Authors:  Monique Albert; John Bartlett; Randal N Johnston; Brent Schacter; Peter Watson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  The importance of biobanking in cancer research.

Authors:  Tania Castillo-Pelayo; Sindy Babinszky; Jodi LeBlanc; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Biobankonomics: developing a sustainable business model approach for the formation of a human tissue biobank.

Authors:  Jimmie Vaught; Joyce Rogers; Todd Carolin; Carolyn Compton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2011

9.  A practical tool for modeling biospecimen user fees.

Authors:  Lise Matzke; Simon Dee; John Bartlett; Sambasivarao Damaraju; Kathryn Graham; Randal Johnston; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson; Leigh Murphy; Lois Shepherd; Brent Schacter; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  A proposed schema for classifying human research biobanks.

Authors:  Peter H Watson; Rebecca O Barnes
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.300

View more
  1 in total

1.  Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of Egyptian physicians towards biobanking issues.

Authors:  Ahmed Samir Abdelhafiz; Eman A Sultan; Hany H Ziady; Douaa M Sayed; Walaa A Khairy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.